@alan @pmeyfroidt @JacquelynGill @davidho so when this approach also does not work (and why would it), will terrorism become acceptable?
The problem is by no means that people don't know about the climate crisis or the protests (FFF anyone?). The problem is that they don't care enough to vote for politicians that care enough. Alienating them further brings the risk of even more short-sighted decisions.
And just to be abundantly clear: I don't advocate for terrorism. I don't want terrorism to be the end of this. I'm not saying any of the current activist groups will become terrorist organizations, as much as the media has already attempted to frame them this way. But by deliberately eliminating all peaceful options without solving the problem we're creating an environment that naturally lends itself to violent actions.
The contradiction between the urgency of the problem and the refusal of the powers that be to even acknowledge the level of action necessary to address it will resolve somehow. And with all peaceful options proven useless, someone will turn to violence.
@alan well, going into politics is THE peaceful option, and the only one that works. That's what the Greens are doing (with admittedly limited success, but definitely some success). Mass protests will help to support the right point of view - what FFF does.
Everything else is childish at best, dangerous at worst. No matter how exactly the alienation happens, once the activists are alienated enough ("public opinion shaped"), they'll be suppressed. Real jail time will cool most heads.
@alan to put it shorter and clearer, "peaceful options are exhausted" is bullshit. We're not in Russia. There is a whole spectrum between "complain on mastodon" and "conduct provocative acts bordering with terrorism" (assuming the latter is even a working option, which is false).
Have I missed mass protests demanding resignation of Wissing? Where are the grassroots movements to make sure the Greens get all voices on all elections? Why are you bashing the only people who can change anything?
@alan so you're saying nothing can solve that? Fair enough.
My only objection is to everyone's fascination with people who glue themselves to streets. They haven't achieved even as much as the Greens or FFF. They have achieved nothing at all, except for hurting the image of all climate conscious people. And they even dare bashing those who've done at least something, if not enough.
@GwladysPendlebury
Ja. Was waiting for someone in this conver to make that exact point:
the people in the cars are the ones who need to loudly demand change. So activists targeting them while The People are not loudly demanding change but quietly going about their fossil biz as usual, is precisely the right way.
Don't forget: the activist groups do not have billions of dollars to rent permanent billboards across the whole country for getting climate context across to the willingly-ignorant and willingly-quiet people.
There is no other way anymore. The People need to be shaken awake, out of their normalcy bias ( good explainer what normalcy bias is: https://jessicawildfire.substack.com/p/its-not-cool-to-overreact-how-normalcy)
"
GET OUT! NOW!
"
And their momentary anger is a good emotional prop to anchor a climate context in their mind.
They need to take to the streets on a weekly basis, like in GDR from May to November 1989. Only then we get a chance for required change to happen.
So join the activists and do road blocks!!
@GwladysPendlebury
scholar-google is my best friend, too.
In the blog post on normalcy bias above, the author gives the example of the woman in one of the twin towers on 9/11.
I picture her, how she, after the planes have hit, still potters around the big office, maybe starts copying something for her boss... because what has just happened and what she therefore must do now is SO outside her usual reality that she can't compute an adequate reaction.
Until someone YELLS at her:
Out !! NOW !!!!
Very powerful picture to illustrate normalcy bias, isn't it.
I never quite got the meme with the dog drinking coffee while the room around him is in flames. Until I read the blog on normalcy bias.
@JacquelynGill @davidho
@GwladysPendlebury @anlomedad @davidho We have fantastic data on public awareness of climate change in the US at a highly granular level. A strong majority of Americans are now Alarmed or Concerned about climate change. What they need are 1) pathways to act, and 2) action from leadership.
I've been a climate scientists and an activist for a long time. Normalcy bias isn't the problem, and blocking traffic for 90 min. isn't the solution, in my opinion.
@GwladysPendlebury @anlomedad @davidho In my experience, and this is also supported by research, targeting corporations and decision-makers is far more effective. Giving the public a clear understanding of who the villains are, and how they can help, grows awareness. Creating solidarity with other groups grows movements.
I'm personally interested in growing effective movements more than catharsis.
Thanks for the thoughtful conversation.
@GwladysPendlebury @JacquelynGill @davidho
If you want "more" activism targetting sociopathic villains, then you need to rouse "more" citizens. But most citizens r still in slumber or they'd be on tge street every Monday like GDR from May to .November 1989.
Maybe they claim being concerned, but they still don't act adequately for giving change a chance to happen.
At AGU conference, not a single climate scientist in the room let go of their normalcy bias to join Peter Kalmus' protest on stage.
Scientist Rebellion, who carry out very intellectual actions, are 1000 people, mistly not climate scuentists,
and what's worse: their actions never go viral, never make the frint page, and the rebels never sit in talkshows.
Your well thought-through activism won't reach enough people. Unless you can first rouse MORE people to becoming activists.
99.999% still quietly think and hope that somebody else will do the job. But that's not how the wall came down.
It requires more citizens doing their job. Back then, it was a regular <= 10% of the population every Monday night.
For people to realize that it is their personal job to bring about change, they need a constant trigger, a constant reminder that there IS a job they're currently not doing.
Road blocks is a simple, cheap, effective way to remind citizens that they're neglecting their responsibilitues.
@GwladysPendlebury
Don't forget how the civil rights movement in the 60s "blocked" diner bars and seats in buses.
Those activists targeted the general population with disruptive action.
In Jacquelyn's opinion they should not have done that, and instead, only protested in front of government buildings or similar.
The citizens in the general population need such triggers to get the problem to the forefront in their minds, and eventually, to some percentage, maybe <= 10% like 1989, really increase the pressure on decision makers.
Like the whites in 1960s USA, citizens today do not feel affected by the problem. Hence, they delegate the problem to someone else, and maybe give advice to activists how to better make use of sparse resources and time.
Sitting at the bar in a diner, or in the forbidden bus seat, or in the blocked road makes the topic less ignor-able. That's the only way to eventually increase the number of activists.
Again: only 1000 international scientists rebels... imagine that... the crème de la crème of international intelligentsia, and only 1000 have made climate change their own personal problem and only 1000 see it as their personal job to increase the pressure on decision makers.
And not a single scientist at AGU conference identified the job Peter Kalmus was doing on stage as their own personal job.
They didn't even protest when Kalmus' research was culled from the conference.
Lol.
They're all drinking coffee in the burning lounge and are all delegating the problem to someone else...
That's normalcy bias.
The gif is hypnotic.
The heavy rain forced Fort Lauderdale's airport to close and Broward County Public Schools to cancel classes for Thursday. Water was up to wheel wells or nearly to hoods of vehicles.
@AlwaysAutumn @davidho it was flash flooding in Fort Lauderdale, Florida casued by too much rain.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/heavy-rain-major-flooding-south-florida-fort-lauderdale/
The heavy rain forced Fort Lauderdale's airport to close and Broward County Public Schools to cancel classes for Thursday. Water was up to wheel wells or nearly to hoods of vehicles.
@carbontwelve woah
Climate activist throw mashed potatoes at works of art and now they flodded streets, disgusting, absolutely disgusting!
😱🤡