@cstross
2 questions immediately spring to mind:
Is the "AI" placement/branding a retrofit to cash in on #AIHype?
Or is there an actual application for generative video "in the field" - & if so, WHO'S THE MARKET?!
[if I turn off my capitalist-apocalypes brain for a moment I think of it as an animation-studio-in-a-box, but that still leaves open the 'who?!']
I used to work for Quantel back when they existed. They were working on something like this about 8 or 9 years ago.
Well when I say "working on" I mean "someone with an impressive job title wandered into a lab and reappeared months later with the basics of something like this and it was then forgotten about". That's how they operated.
@robcornelius @jwildeboer I used to work for the engineer who designed the PLUTO card and the graphics engine in the Quantel Paintbox. Set up his own company. In 1990 they were selling an ISA-bus graphics card with four i860 cores and 16Mb of VRAM for a cool £16,000. (Call it £25,000 in today's money.) Matrox and Nvidia caught up with the performance in the consumer under-£500 sector about 8 years later ...
It cost more than its weight in silver.
I probably worked with people who worked with him then.
They were a truly terrible company to work for. I should have walked out on Day 1 when the manager who hired me said "We were so glad to see a white guy apply". No shit. An IT company of ~400 people in the UK and not one black or brown face.
In their day they had a licence to print money but blew it suing Adobe. Eventually they got taken over, then that company was bought out. Its all gone now. Good riddance.
@cstross
Notice how they wisely tell you neither the price nor the power consumption. Either one will prevent the vast majority from even considering this ridiculous thing.
Not that it will prevent some of our users from asking for one...
@lispi314 @cstross
1.8-3KW faceplate power draw depending on things such as how much memory and what GPU - 6TB memory would draw up to 1.8KW by itself.
That lower figure is already more than domestic power outlets can deliver where I live (15A/100V per circuit, but 12A per plug max).
Even if you have the power, you're now sitting in front of a 1.8KW space heater noisily blasting hot air into the room you're sitting in.
@lispi314 @cstross
Note that you probably have a higher power limit than me (it's notably low where I live).
And you can of course spec this lower than the max - a single smaller GPU and just a few hundred GB of RAM will use less power - but why consider this thing unless you want a high spec?
The threadripper variant on that page makes at least a bit more sense than this server CPU one.
@lispi314 @cstross
Honestly, this is why I don't really get the "portable" part of it. If you have to have something like this, don't get a "portable" one.
You're going to basically permanently keep it plugged into a single site. Most homes and offices won't be able to accommodate it - for noise and heat if nothing else - so instead get something you can rack mount out of sight in an adjacent closet or instrument rack.
Cheaper, better cooling, less noise for the humans.
@jannem @cstross This is more mobile in the sense of mobile command center than really portable, since you basically have to bring your own infrastructure with you.
That being said, I'd still want a (brief|pelican)case computer as they're very useful in a lot of ways (even just building one supporting proper #ECC memory unlike most laptops), just one more conservatively spec'd.
Back around ~2012, my thesis advisor wanted a laptop with a discrete GPU for mobile CUDA (general-purpose computing on GPU) development. He bought a monster. I think it had an NVidia Quadro. The fans were very loud, so he couldn't use it in meetings because it would drown out our voices.
He bought a Macbook Air just to have something quiet to take notes on in meetings. When he added the Air to his bag with the giant laptop, the difference in weight was negligible.
@gsuberland @cstross
Dual Epyc 9654 CPUs would mean 192 cores - but clocked relatively slowly (boost clock is 3.55Ghz).
They're great CPUs for HPC or running lots of VMs in a data center. I'm not sure this is the configuration of choice for any kind of media, though; fewer but faster cores with more memory bandwidth per core should be a much better fit?
Ok, it has some problems, but if one appeared on your doorstep, you'd probably have some fun with it.
@cstross Oh goodness, it's commercially available.
I want it.