So, as @chancerydaily points out, legacy blue checks who don't want the blue checks are currently stuck with the blue checks and Musk is implying they may be paying.
And the only way to hide the blue check is if you actually do pay, where you will soon get an option to hide the fact that you pay.
This truly is the dumbest timeline.
@mmasnick
I'm not a lawyer, so I wonder about the legality of falsely claiming endorsements from public figures, and if this text lying about popular figures paying for Blue would fall into such a category.
Or maybe you're all in the top whatever percent of users that may be given Blue for free. Whether you want it or not.
@mmasnick
Or you could just, you know, hear me out here, not give a duck and leave the stupid hell site.
But that's the thing. Too many people crave the attention. I haven't been on Twitter in five months and am thrilled.
Edited to add...
This was NOT meant to imply that Mike is craving the attention (but poorly phrased). It's meant to say that so many people still spend so much time over there and it seems just not giving a duck about Twitter would be better...
@mmasnick
Not sure I'm "scolding"
I just think that less attention to Twitter would be better.
Elmo found out that all these people wouldn't pay, so he created yet another way to get paid.
The fake tweet from his mother about him being a disappointment doesn't seem harsh enough now does it?
@mmasnick @chancerydaily It's surprisingly brilliant. Sure, Musk is devaluing the blue check and killing the verification which attracted both creators and readers alike.
But now he's protecting his subscribers from being blocked en masse, and effectively extorting actual notables into paying to remove the mark of chumps.
@donw @mmasnick @chancerydaily Blind squirrel, acorn etc.
What's funny is that Musk intended to sell prestige (the blue check), but this move is a recognition that all he's done is devalue it so much it now has a stigma attached to it.
Gotta admit, it seems effective at extorting nearly everybody but it seems lots of work vs. just changing it to subscription and calling it a day.
But that method would be far less enshittifying so perhaps that's the draw.
@mmasnick @chancerydaily so basically the one real service Twitter Blue offers to owners of formerly verified accounts is the ability to hide that checkmark?
Absolute genious.
So it gets even more interesting: I have not updated my app since Musk took over. As of this weekend, I no longer see paid verified badges at all. I only see real legacy ones.
A Musk reply-guy who shows up as "verified" on the web, has no check on my app. He must be paid.
Meanwhile, real verified folks like you do have a check and are listed as “This account is verified because it's notable in government, news, entertainment, or another designated category.”
So the question for @Popehat : if this situation persists past their self-imposed deadline, is this defamation by implication? Since it implies you were dumb enough to pay and you can’t get rid of it?
@mmasnick @chancerydaily So, if I have a blue check and don't want a blue check, I'm stuck with a blue check that shows I want it.
Doc: *Yeah*.
And If I want to get rid of the check, to show I don't want it, I have to buy the check. Then once I have the check, I can get rid of the check.
Doc: *You got it*.
<long whistle>
Yosarian: Thats some check, that Check-Twenty-Blue
Doc: *Its the best there is!*
@Jayslacks I kinda need it for work.
What is it with so many people on Mastodon who feel they should tell other people what they should or should not do?
Its a very enthusiastic community 🤷♂️
But you are correct, heard similar explanations from other journalists. Its still a bigger platform with many more users. If you need this platform for communication you have to be active on this platform. No one to blame for that
Similar reason why people have to use Windows even if there are enough alternatives like Linux. If you need a certain program and its only available on Windows there is almost nothing you can do about it.
@crary @mmasnick
this makes me suspect the lack of follow through is sometimes intentional. It works in their favor this time because it implies that all sorts of people are quietly paying for Twitter Blue... and maybe you should just give in and pay up too.
That everyone knows they've been having difficulty executing turns into plausible deniability.
I'm guessing that you can't hide your checkmark as a legacy verified account unless you also pay for Twitter Blue.
What a hustle.
He will probably bill you 1000$ going forward to remove this symbol of social media shame
I see two possible explanations:
1) he might intentionally muddy the water, guessing that not many people will subscribe. By keeping the legacy checkmarks he inflates the visible subscription indicators. More people might pay because you don’t look like a paying sheep and account xyz also has a blue checkmark and might pay.
2) The backlash on revoking the “legacy verification” was too big.
I think it’s option 1.