violets are blue
to exit vim
:wq
I think that I shall never see
An end as cool as CTRL-X CTRL-C
Just could not let Emacs be bested...
But there are some important differences.
For one, on USENET messages had a Subject line. Users were presented with a menu of sender:subject, from which they could select the messages to read. In Mastodon the menu has the whole messages, which means most messages go unseen, not just unread.
#Mastodon #Usenet #UserInterface https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/22835
Proposal Related to #20117 and #20185 but more radical. Rename the CW field "Summary". Make that field mandatory on every toot. Limit its length to something small, like 140 characters. O...
Another big difference is that the Usenet was partitioned into a rather stable set of "bboards", each with curators who tried to weed out trash, spam, and out-of-topic content. Mastodon uses hashtags instead, but users can invent these freely, and no one is curating their "content".
@JorgeStolfi @ghorwood Actually newsgroups were mostly not moderated and the names were basically tags and were completely uncontrolled out of the big seven.
Source: I used to be one of those guys in news.groups who ran votes and stuff.
@ghorwood @JorgeStolfi Not as high as you may think. There were meowers and other kinds of spoilers, one group kept posting roadkill recipes between rec.food and alt.pets groups. Even big names engaged in newsgroup raids, like Rob Pike's attack on net.suicide under the guise of Elizabeth Bimmler. I watched one guy 'splaining C to Dennis Ritchie on comp.lang.c.
Then we got September 1983.