Roses are red.
Roses are blue.
Depending on their velocity
relative to you.
@dgar I've seen this one
@martinvermeer
๐Ÿ––๐Ÿ˜ผโ˜๏ธ
@dgar Apparently this little ditty was via my paternal grandmother, whom I never knew:
Roses are red.
Violets are blueish.
If it wasn't for Jesus
We'd all be Jewish.

@peemee @dgar
One I remember:

Roses are red.
Violets are blue.
Orchids are expensive:
Will dandelions do?

@dgar Hubble joke. Well done.
@dgar Hi, there. I was following you, but had to unfollow. You boost so many posts, that my timeline is almost entirely filled with your interests instead of mine. Sorry, It's too much.
@carfreesince93
No problem! I totally understand!! Thanks for letting me know.
I have so many followers now that itโ€™s hard to keep up. I think Iโ€™m beginning to understand why people with a large following donโ€™t interact so much with the community, but Iโ€™m still trying to connect with everybody. Maybe I should dial it downโ€ฆ.
๐Ÿ˜Š
@carfreesince93 hi, just a quick note: there's a "hide boosts" option hidden on the user page after you follow them, that will show you only direct posts from someone. Hope that's helpful.
@dgar

@Tattie @carfreesince93 @dgar

I actually unfollowed someone because I wanted it the other way around.

@dgar ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ

@dgar Indeed, I've decided to nerd out a bit here...

Assuming "red" is 420 THz and "blue" is 650 THz, with the receiver standing still while *in the vacuum of space*.

The rose will be travelling to the viewer at... 106,080,408 m/s
or...
at 35.38% the speed of light!!!

Now that's a fast rose headed RIGHT at you xD

@TrebleSketch ๐Ÿง๐Ÿค“๐Ÿ‘
Relativistic Baseball

@hugo Indeed x3

I remember reading this when it was first released, loved it!

Thanks for reminding me about this again :D

@TrebleSketch @dgar

Quick back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests it would have about 7 Hiroshima bombs of energy, too...

@dgar Reminds me of this oldie...
@dgar Alternative ending:
The type of variety
Dictates the hue.
@dgar How does their color depend on their velocity? And how does their color depend on the velocity of the source of light?
Redshift - Wikipedia

@dgar Thanks. Yes, I understand the general idea about the redshift and the Doppler effect. I'm asking about how the velocity of the source of light (e.g. sun), and the velocity of the reflecting surface (e.g. roses) contribute to this effect. Are both of them important?
@ereliuer_eteer
The velocity of light is light speed. The velocity of the rose, as other commenters have suggested, needs to be very high indeed to appear blue.
@dgar No, I didn't mean the speed of light. I mean the relative velocity of the source of light (e.g. sun) to the rose and to the observer. I assume the color of the lighting is also important, not only the color of the reflective surface.
@ereliuer_eteer
โ€ฆwait. Youโ€™re a theoretical physicist? Why are you asking me??! ๐Ÿ˜‚
@dgar Yes, I was 21 years ago. I asked because I always thought about the red/blueshift as depending on the relative velocity of the source of light and the observer. But you introduced a reflective surface (roses), and it created a new perspective on this phenomenon, that I never thought about before, so I invited you to a discussion about it. ๐Ÿ™‚
@ereliuer_eteer
Ah. Iโ€™m a high school dropout. I need Brian Cox or Neil DeGrasse to explain it! โ˜๏ธ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ‘
@ereliuer_eteer
@TrebleSketch any ideas if being a reflective surface makes a difference?
@dgar
Roses are pink
Roses are white
You can't survive on roses on a cold wintry night.
@dgar and violets are violet. Dammit
@dgar Reminds me of Carl Sagan's Cosmos series, in the 80s, where he demonstrated that in a hypothetical universe wherein the speed of light was 80 km/h, motorcycles would be seen bluish or red depending on where the observer was.