@chrismessina @caseynewton
Casey's credibility is based on his reputation. His reputation is based on the past veracity of his reporting and his demonstration of journalistic ethics - such as not revealing his sources. Jeopardizing his sources would make me trust the story *less*.
On the other hand Musk has had to settle fraud charges on the basis of his tweets before. I see no reason to trust this "rebuttal" more than Tesla Autopilot being ready in 2018.
@ian @caseynewton fair. Perhaps I'm more interested in whether 1) the source was already planning to leave Twitter (presuming that is true) 2) whether Casey knew that when he talked to this source.
Also, I actually kind of don't care because the net-net of it is that Elon wants more views and took actions to get more views, meanwhile my views have gone down so regardless of the source, Elon is ruining Twitter. 😬
@colleen @caseynewton especially if Twitter was so close to bankruptcy… why are you bleeding money on PTO if you can’t afford it and the guy was fired anyway?
he’s clearly lying and the fact that some people don’t see that is concerning :/
Exactly...
“@thecryptojourno @platformer The “source” of the bogus Platformer article is a disgruntled employee who had been on paid time off for months, had already accepted a job at Google and felt the need to poison the well on the way out. Twitter will be taking legal action against him.”
The guy has lied about his dead child for likes, so I am guessing "all of it".
@mikkergp @caseynewton @chancerydaily
I mean nowhere in his comment is he saying any of the allegations are false.
This screams like he is just taking petty revenge on someone who dared to speak the truth about him.
That he is deliberately sending his cult after them by seeding enough breadcrumbs to Doxx the person while maintaining deniability.