Reminder that the Jesusy “He Gets Us” campaign now playing on the Super Bowl has far-right donors. Don’t be drawn in by social justice dressing.

The foundation behind it has been labeled a hate group.

Please, please spread the word. "He Gets Us" is akin to the "pregnancy centers" that throw women seeking abortions into prison.

The Far Right Is Funding Evangelical Super Bowl Sunday Ads

Upcoming Christian Super Bowl ads are framed as diverse and inclusive. But the money behind them comes from a rabidly antiabortion and antigay organization.

‘He Gets Us’ Super Bowl Ad Aims to Increase Relevance of Jesus

The campaign aims to increase the relevance of Jesus in American culture, according to the agency behind the ads. David Green, the founder of Hobby Lobby, has said he is a donor.

The New York Times
@virginiaheffernan I thought that headline read “revenue of Jesus” and, maybe it could.
@virginiaheffernan
They seemed to have missed the hate group part...
@virginiaheffernan A more accurate name for the org would be "Alliance Defending Mass-Incarceration." It seems as if it were little more than a front for police unions to ensure full employment. #DEFUND #abolish

@virginiaheffernan I'll spread the word, but it was obvious from the "Jesus" bullshit. If it's pitching "Jesus", then it's lying to you to manipulate you.

That simple.

@notroot @virginiaheffernan it really isn't, but I understand the frustration. Can elaborate if needed
@virginiaheffernan evangelical are biggest hate group in the world
@virginiaheffernan they never fed a hungry person ever
@virginiaheffernan how many people could they have fed
@virginiaheffernan maybe they should watch their own ads instead of being hypocrites. I hear Jesus didn't like hypocrites.
@virginiaheffernan Southern Poverty Law holding up Justice all by her lonesome once again. I guess Chris Wray sleeps well at night.  
@virginiaheffernan Absolutely……That is why it is critical to understand who is behind the words….. In this day and age it is too easy to twist the good to cover the bad and nasty….

@virginiaheffernan Now, this is a more compelling argument. Are you stating this is a contributor or are they administration behind the messaging? The latter being obviously more problematic than the former.

BTW, there is a line here. Everyone has a Constitutional right to their beliefs and to does them. They just don’t have a right to violate others. Labeling folks as hate groups based on religious belief is dodgy at best.

1 of 2

@virginiaheffernan Fundies have a Constitutional right to believe abortion is murder and that homosexuality is an abomination under God’s Word. We don’t have to agree with it. We can be vehemently opposed. That doesn’t remove the slippery slope on your beliefs being restricted when we start violating the First Amendment rights of others we disagree with.

2 of 2

@PaulH I am making no law to abridge nothing, obviously. They can advertise all they want. Viewers should simply know the advertising is deceptive.

@virginiaheffernan

Correction: Everyone has a Constitutional right to their beliefs and to speak them.

@virginiaheffernan I still say that by putting a social justice spin on it that they're going to help the UCC while hurting their core issues.
@virginiaheffernan Was flabbergasted to read this earlier today. They want to unite the US as a Christian nation. As my people say, oy vey is mir!
Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 7:15-20 - New International Version

True and False Prophets - “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.

Bible Gateway

@virginiaheffernan They have a section on their website that’s supposed to address this by making it sound very altruistic of the donors, who wish to remain anonymous because it “isn’t about them.”

The whole website manages to use a lot of words without saying anything of substance.

@virginiaheffernan It’s vibe is very much “we should all just get along.” They go out of their way not to call attention to anything controversial or offensive to anyone on any side of any issue. It’s a very perfect lukewarm, straddling of the proverbial fence.
The Far Right Is Funding Evangelical Super Bowl Sunday Ads

Upcoming Christian Super Bowl ads are framed as diverse and inclusive. But the money behind them comes from a rabidly antiabortion and antigay organization.

@virginiaheffernan GQP have always been the groomers
@virginiaheffernan O M G, why am I not surprised ? Today's Republican Jesus is nowhere close to Jesus in the Bible. He is much closer to the deceitful Jesus Santos or Jesus Zabrovsky or Jesus Ravache IMHO... What would Jesus do? It depends on which Jesus you're talking about...

@virginiaheffernan
F*ck JeSUS if he supports any of this.

Haha yes SUS.

But in all seriousness, we HAVE to off these hate groups; if they can be on television nazifying the masses, then we have an issue in that sector.

@virginiaheffernan
Thanks for the heads up. Nobody who works with or gives money to the ADF is worth my time or money.
@virginiaheffernan
When Jesus is nothing more than a product that has to be marketed...
@virginiaheffernan Funny how they make a commercial presenting Jesus as SJW/woke but how much they hate BLM and antifa. 😕
@virginiaheffernan I just assumed that. Christo-fascists are so obvious they’re easy to spot.
@virginiaheffernan Given that the Christian playbook has included the Inquisition, witch trials, Manifest Destiny and other colonialist apologism, “Kill them all and let God sort them out”, control of reproductive rights, burning crosses on people’s lawns, and so on, I’m surprised that anyone is still taken in by “Baby Jesus, meek and mild”.
@virginiaheffernan As someone who has in the past been enmeshed in both right wing and for-real left wing progressive Christianity, it's always been clear to me that this was the former pretending to be the latter. I'm glad many people are understanding this
@virginiaheffernan It was nauseating. I can't believe our society is so intellectually crippled as to accept that nonsense as anything but Earth's longest con.
@virginiaheffernan
the lemmings are so easily manipulated --
to the cliffs friends, to the cliffs
✌️☕
@virginiaheffernan if jesusy has enough money to buy a $7million spot, he’s got enough to pay taxes

@virginiaheffernan

I often wonder how a nigtmarish dystopia such as the Handmaid's Tale could ever come true, and then I see those ads...

@virginiaheffernan fox made up liberal grooming because they have been grooming Nazis for decades
@virginiaheffernan If a religious organization can afford a SuperBowl ad they can afford to pay their taxes

@LindaCollins11 @virginiaheffernan @Flux in Canada, taxing religious entities would amount to a tax only on their non-charitable activities.

The "promotion of religion" is currently considered a charitable activity in Canada, and churches don't have to split it out from actual charitable activity, nor publish their charitable efficiency.

A big point for me is that no organization should get a tax subsidy and use that to settle their abuse cases.

@virginiaheffernan Rebecca Watson did a video on this almost two weeks ago (!):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1idNZnX0F8
Who's Behind Those Jesus Ads You're Gonna See During the Big Game

YouTube
@virginiaheffernan I’m pretty sure Jesus would approve of spending $20 million on advertising rather than the sick and homeless. #supplysidejesus
@virginiaheffernan @eunger
This is so weird. I just glanced at their website.
@dalfen @virginiaheffernan exactly how many can you order at one time?
@dalfen @virginiaheffernan only one of each?! Supply side Jesus does not approve.

@eunger @virginiaheffernan

I wonder if it's one of those things where they'll get it free (or can donate what they want too)-- but then they'll get a sales catalogue in the mail when the items are shipped to them.

(And of course the big thing is their info is in the org's database*)

@dalfen @virginiaheffernan winding up on their list is the only thing stopping me from ordering and distributing to the homeless.
@virginiaheffernan Ok, but isn’t it more important who is running it and for what reasons than who’s contributed? Sometimes the message is the thing. If it’s good, does it matter that an entity we don’t see eye-to-eye with has contributed to it? Do we throw the baby out with the bath water every time an entity opposed to our ideology winds on on the same page we’re on? That seems both counterproductive and counterintuitive to me.