floating point representation
Posit: A Potential Replacement for IEEE 754

Motivation Number systems and computer arithmetics are essential for designing efficient hardware and software architecture. In particular, real-valued computation constitutes a crucial component i…

SIGARCH
@nathanstocks AFAIK nobody (or almost nobody) uses posits, I only write about things that are very commonly used :)
@b0rk Well, dang. Posits are super awesome, and we're only not using them due to inertia. 😢
@nathanstocks that could be true! it's just not what I do here -- I explain how computers work today, not theorize about potential futures :)
@nathanstocks @b0rk that is a pretty strong exaggeration. We don’t use posits partially because of inertia, but also because they aren’t really any better than IEEE floats, and they’re also worse in some important ways.
@steve @b0rk Oh! I didn't know that. I should read up some more, then. All that I've read to date was glowing recommendations for it.
@nathanstocks @steve there's a subthread here talking about some criticisms (if you scroll down) https://social.jvns.ca/@kelpana@mastodon.ie/109835299704305047
Alanna (@[email protected])

@[email protected] The "Posits": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unum_(number_format)

mastodon.ie
@b0rk @steve Cool, thank you! Such a recent thread, too. I wish I had caught it in the first place. Sorry for the noise!

@nathanstocks @steve @b0rk also worth noting that over the last 8 years there have been 3 different versions:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unum_(number_format)

so if you had moved to type II posits (say) you'd have to migrate again. i would stay away unless you're interesting in doing your own evaluation and implementation.

Unum (number format) - Wikipedia

@nathanstocks @b0rk Posits are a scam. I've never read papers more disingenuous in my entire life.
@mbr @b0rk I’ve learned a lot from these sub threads! This paper someone linked to seems to be a pretty thorough look at the pros and cons. Posits are definitely not as advantageous as I was led to believe. Rather there are a bunch of trade offs, like many things in life. https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~demmel/ma221_Fall20/Dinechin_etal_2019.pdf
@nathanstocks @b0rk Posits don't live up to the hype, and the posit interval arithmetic proposal was downright broken. The primary thing posits are good at is marketing.