BIG NEWS: #TyreNichols’ murder reminds us that #police traffic stops can turn deadly. 400 unarmed drivers killed in 5 years.

I'm introducing the "Safer Traffic Stops Act". It would pay local governments to transfer traffic enforcement from armed police officers to cameras or civilians.

@RitchieTorres That won't help, because armed drug dealers will still be found by civilians - and may still turn deadly.

@alpha1beta But why would armed drug dealers kill anyone over a traffic ticket?

The reason traffic stops turn deadly is because we use them as a pretext for cops to catch more serious criminals. But if it was just a ticket and not a warrant check, roadside search, and other investigations; nobody would care.

As usual, the solutions we’ve been doing cause the biggest problems we face; including how The War on Drugs makes every problem associated with drugs far worse.

@biobrain Because folks who are armed and dangerous and they're forced to ID themselves.

For anyone with anything illegal it'll set off fight/flight.

And to any decent cop, you're going to look much closer if they have a record.

These folks are criminal masterminds, they're drugs are typically in plain sight. The second they see flashing lights they know they're going to ail, and they have seconds to decide what to do

@alpha1beta Everything you're describing is caused by the current system and the scenario you gave would get an armed cop killed the same as a civilian since guns can't stop bullets.

Imagine if criminals knew that cops wouldn't check their record or arrest them even if drugs were in plain site? Why would they risk life in prison or execution over a $100 speeding ticket or expired tags?

Again, our solutions are causing the biggest problems; including the War on Drugs itself.

@biobrain You're also making the assumption that its just minor little tickets and not reckless driving or actions that critically endanger people's lives or that a cop doesn't pull someone over because they see something while they're say returning from another call. What are they supposed to do, call a civilian while a drunk driver continues on?

I get your point. One of my favorite cities in the world (Ithaca, NY) has been trying to do something similar. But it's not that simple.

@biobrain This article has a write up on how Ithaca is proposing to divide duties, missing one that I know was previously mentioned - car accidents would be civilian + EMS as needed. Traffic generally could be handled by both.

https://ithacavoice.com/2022/03/city-introduces-long-awaited-plans-for-department-of-community-safety-in-sweeping-recommendations-report/

City introduces long-awaited plans for Department of Community Safety in sweeping recommendations report

Ithaca Voice reporter Jimmy Jordan contributed reporting to this article. ITHACA, N.Y.—More than a year after the Reimagining Public Safety process was jumpstarted with much fanfare, the city can finally lay its eyes on concrete ideas for the future of policing in Ithaca. The City of Ithaca published its final recommendations report on implementing the […]

The Ithaca Voice
@alpha1beta That sounds good. So why are you opposing such a system on a national level?

@biobrain I'm not generally opposed to it, but there's no way to implement it without causing more harm in the short term.

This plan wouldn't meet your needs, really, cops are still going to be the primary for traffic - their only planning to hire 5 civilians. Honestly, you'd probably be better off telling the cops to put their gun in the trunk instead of their belt.

@alpha1beta @biobrain Michael - you seem to be trying to stop drug dealers with traffic stops. I think this bill is about separating the two issues. I would guess most people speeding or running a stop sign are not drug dealers. This bill proposes that be automated by cameras. Police can still find drug dealers - possibly at their place of work. I'd argue that they'd find more drug dealers at the drug deal.

@the_ray_archie @alpha1beta @biobrain great response. Without getting into motives, the police community insists on the traffic stops to prevent all other sorts of crime, when in reality it’s the equivalent of finding a needle in a stack of other needles.

If law enforcement stops 100 cars, and 1 of them had drugs, is that a win for the community? Will we pretend that there aren’t other ways to find 1 drug dealer? Will we pretend that stopping 99 innocent people doesn’t have its own cost?

@mannsworld @alpha1beta @biobrain Exactly. I reported a "drug store" recently and was pleasantly surprised to see an increased police presence which resulted in a 2 month shut down (and no shots fired)

Accuracy, diligence, accountability... we can do better and improve the system.

@the_ray_archie That's a awesome story. You must have provided a great tip for them to be able to act on it.

@alpha1beta lol. When I go fishing, I don't troll. I look for the birds, read my radar, and read the water. "Fish where the fish are" is the saying. =)

As for my tip... I like safe neighborhoods and we all do our part.

@the_ray_archie I wasn't trying to be sarcastic or anything - that's a really good story and tip. Truly impressive both that you were able to give them actionable info and that they did something about it.
I've called in the occasional tip (my office pre-pandemic looked out on a liquor store that has a ton of drug deals) and I don't think I ever saw a reaction other than send a bike cop that way for an hour.
@mannsworld There needs to be a distinction between a minor violation such as a tail like out, and a felony stop because someone is clearly under the influence or extremely reckless. Will a tail light stop result in a drug arrest? Rarely, really just pure odds. Most of what I see in my area is people who can't maintain a lane getting stopped and finding all kinds of "goodies" - removing a dangerous person and finding out there's more. A camera or civilian aren't doing to fix those.

@the_ray_archie I'm not suggesting that's the only solution. So this bill's full text is not yet available, but from his post, it says traffic violates to civilians and cameras. I know some places, Ithaca, NY for one (https://ithacavoice.com/2022/03/city-introduces-long-awaited-plans-for-department-of-community-safety-in-sweeping-recommendations-report/ is a good read) are considering handing some traffic stops to civilians.

And there's many problems with that that don't do much to actually solve any of the issues at hand.

City introduces long-awaited plans for Department of Community Safety in sweeping recommendations report

Ithaca Voice reporter Jimmy Jordan contributed reporting to this article. ITHACA, N.Y.—More than a year after the Reimagining Public Safety process was jumpstarted with much fanfare, the city can finally lay its eyes on concrete ideas for the future of policing in Ithaca. The City of Ithaca published its final recommendations report on implementing the […]

The Ithaca Voice
@alpha1beta Agreed. I like the automated camera solution better than civilians. I will admit that I ignored the civilian half of this solution. I think it's dumb.

@the_ray_archie

The cameras are a mixed bag IMO. in my state, red light cameras are unconstitutional and were found to be ineffective - running red lights didn't decrease.

Automated cameras could become a racket to raise money and hurt those, especially those that may not be able to afford it, and they run the risk of abuse (storing records for too long, using it for pattern analysis etc)

And they're expensive to deploy with money leaving your local community.

@the_ray_archie They may be more useful for some things than others, like speeding especially over longer distances (clocking someone multiple times), or reckless driving, failure to maintain a lane etc, but the risk is that it would automate tickets to people avoiding a pothole or trash in the road - and make it impossible to fight: pay the fine and be done, or fight it in court, taking time off and risking points and court costs if you're found guilty.
@alpha1beta You make a great point. Is it possible to separate drug traffic policing from traffic cop duties? Strangely police presence in schools seems to create negative outcomes - that's not to say we don't need security there but... education and reform isn't the main tenant of policing. This discussion is highlighting similar challenges. Not every traffic stop is a drug stop. To lower the fatality rate, we need to rethink the current 'solution'

@the_ray_archie So with a brother who's a cop, he'll tell you 100%, no its not. Everything happens too fast - if someone's visible drunk, you have to act right away.

In NJ, we can call a number to report texting while driving and a letter will get mailed to them warning them, could cops do similar with taillights or other minor vehicle maintenance? Probably - the only thing there is can you speed up that process enough that sending a letter over an immediate stop doesn't risk others.

@alpha1beta Random story... I got pulled over speeding outside of Houston. I was dressed in a Tux, had an acoustic bass in the back, and was late for a concert. I totally got let off. I'm not sure if it's true, but I've always felt I'd be treated differently if I had a hoodie and a dj system. How do we legislate to address that discrepancy (if it existed)? And how do we address my underlying fear?
@the_ray_archie I'm white and I'm still scared to shit when I get pulled over and I know I didn't do anything that's going to cause anything more than an inconvenience. I don't think you can remove the fear, but there's a lot you can do - from cops not being dicks about something like a tail light! I lived alone for years, I always had this irrational fear of getting a ticket for a light out because I'd never know if it was.
@the_ray_archie The thing I think that made the most difference to me, personally was learning the best practices for being pulled over. It was never in driver's ed, but with many of these shootings, I heard what people were saying - turn off the car, hands on the wheel, light on, window down, etc. I also get two copies of my registration so I have everything in my wallet, not wallet + glovebox/center console. And that did more than anything for me - knowing both of our expectations are the same

@alpha1beta In Berkeley and Oakland, they suspended 'nuisance' reasons for pulling people over. Police can't pull people over for taillights and minor cosmetic stuff. I think that's an interesting thing to consider beyond just the city level.

In NYC, the meter maid crew will worry about registration and tag stuff. An officer in a car would never pull you over for that (they are too busy)

Which brings us back to real traffic violations and drunk driving....

@alpha1beta As a phase 1, maybe the federal law can help to adopt some of the NY/CA approach to limit 'nuisance' stops. THEN as a second iteration, think about further refinement with technology and training (the bigger challenge)

@the_ray_archie The first part certainly seems reasonable and workable - it could be as simple as an automated letter or phone call, at least to a certain point.

With both, you also have find ways to encourage proper use. I've heard horror stories about small highway towns in places like TX that make the entire town's budget from traffic stops. You'd have to get those type of places on board.

@the_ray_archie With the tech, there's the enforcement side, the driver side and then the oversight and data privacy (How long is data kept how else it can be used) and not becoming a bigger revenue machine. Then there's always the debate about could better public transit play a role. I'd fear the tech being used either to create a surveillance state and some other alternatives like driveless rental cars as a way to punish drivers who want to drive, and take away ownership of one more thing.