A gentle reminder that if I don't know you, your choice of first contact with me (or, really, anyone) probably shouldn't be sarcasm or "playful" aggressiveness. Online communication often lacks nuance and context, and I will just assume you're a jerk and block you. Remember: The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole.'

This toot brought to you by more than one to-me-rather-obnoxious response here, followed by immediate blockage.

@scalzi yeah, it's frustrating to try to figure out if someone is sincerely trying to be a jerk or just being "playful" and I agree, it's very rarely worth trying
@AbandonedAmerica @scalzi If I ever even ask myself the question, I just go ahead and insta-block. I mean, I don't know the person. I only have a single data point, and it's "asshole." I have nothing to lose (and a slightly more pleasant social media experience to gain) from permanently silencing them.
@AbandonedAmerica @scalzi “We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.”
― Kurt Vonnegut, Mother Night
@scalzi thanks for the phrase "the failure mode of clever is asshole".

@scalzi I'm sure it's more common for you than for those of us who aren't in the public eye, but that's my policy too. I don't bother trying to figure out if they're really assholes. I don't engage. I just insta-block.

And it's done wonders for my mental health. Online assholes used to bother me a little bit. My insta-block policy has realigned my perception such that THEY SIMPLY DON'T MATTER. I didn't know they existed 30 seconds ago, and I can pretend they don't exist for the rest of my life.

@scalzi
There is a glibness that I never cared for on the birdsite - I see it here less, thankfully.
@scalzi I read one of your books it was very good also I like you as a person very handsome
@scalzi Thank you so much for directing my future interactions with you. I will strive to remember them and apply them.

@scalzi Back on Twitter when you’d say something like this, or post a screenshot of some oaf being a jerk I would often go search for the original to chortle (in my head only) at them and then (probably) preemptively block them (in the all-too-common case where their timeline otherwise indicated that blocking was the right course).

Perhaps good for my mental health/happier wasting of time that I can’t really do that on Mastodon.

@mrawdon @scalzi I’ll second that. I think that the lack of an algorithm pushing content into followers’ timelines helps to minimize the splash-effect of people being jerks. Doesn’t help the target themselves, unfortunately, but it may provide a somewhat less stressful environment overall. My .02$ and I am not an expert on how stuff propagates around here.
@scalzi point taken. Genuinely. Always good to be as explicit as possible
@scalzi "Geez Jack, I was just wondering what your thoughts were about animal husbandry..."
@scalzi @AbandonedAmerica I couldn’t agree with you more. It’s rare for me to block people here, but that sort of terrible first impression is one of the things that can encourage me to do it.🤷🏻‍♀️
@scalzi I'm sorry that you're dealing with that here. I see mostly coherent and kind posts on my tiny account, so it's actually a little surprising to hear about japery.
@scalzi @AbandonedAmerica And I’m sorry that happened to you. I hope you meet nothing but the nicest folks here in the future.
@scalzi Have you managed to talk Gail Simone into opening an account on a fediverse instance? Also, since listening to your Kaiju book, I tend to hear your posts in Wil Wheaten’s voice. Is this common?
@scalzi my first contact with you was in-line at a book signing where we talked about guitars. There was still no nuance, because Guitars!!
@scalzi I have been trying to figure out for a while now the best way to get this concept across to a nine year old. Any suggestions?
@scalzi I am guilty of this. I try to err on the side of using extra emojis and exclamations to hopefully come across as silly as I'm trying to be.

@scalzi

I'll have to remember this, it's often my default for in person communication where it works far better 🙂

@scalzi I have quoted you saying “The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole.' ” a whole lot. It’s some of the best advice I’ve seen on them Internets.
@scalzi Is playful self-deprecation cool? If not, I have some serious reinvention to do.
@scalzi
Sarcasm is already a cheap form of comedy requiring little nuance or cleverness. Sarcasm REALLY doesn’t work in plaintext communications. I really wish people would just learn this lesson that sarcasm, in general, just doesn’t work in social media communications.
@scalzi That does explain why online communication can be so wearing; as we're trying to discern nuance and context from something that has very little of either.
@scalzi I made that mistake once, but it was years ago and you let me slide (thanks!) :-)
@scalzi (spends minutes calibrating response) Hello.

@scalzi So true, it's just frustrating and uncomfortable when total strangers you never interacted with approach you with overfamiliarity and/or playful passive-aggressiveness expecting you to decipher their tone as if you've been buddies for years. Sorry you had to deal with that.

Also thank you for the phrase "the failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole.' "

@scalzi
Hi Scalzi, Don't know you but respect your screening protocol. Am a writer in Asheville, NC, serious environmentalist, gardener, cat person, etc. Oh, musician and painter too.

@scalzi

Remember: The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole.'

Love this statement, going to add it to my email sig now...

@scalzi

I first heard this quote, "The failure mode of 'clever' is 'asshole," in one of Wil Wheaton's books. He credited you.

I've now used it as well and think about it a lot. It's a good mantra for the internet and life.

@scalzi Some sincerity to balance out the goobers: I've said this to you before, but it never hurts to reiterate that your books have many a time been a light in the darkness and a piece of joy when everything else was Just Too Hard, and I'm immensely grateful for your wit and sense of fun. I'm always looking forward to the next one, but you're one of my favorite authors to re-read because your books are just so damn clever. Cheers!

@scalzi A while back, on Twitter, I spent more than a year* wondering if you had muted me due to a misconstrueable comment I’d made to you. I was inordinately relieved when you quote-tweeted me later in an unrelated discussion.

*Not non-stop. I also did other things during that year.

@scalzi I get this sometimes too. And it's often people who both mean well but who also don't understand that people with a larger audience (women esp!) often get a LOT of this kind of nyuk nyuk j/k j/k interaction. James Acaster devoted an entire podcast talking about how it drove him off of social media, everyone trying to kind of josh with him and basically just being kind of jerkish.
@scalzi I'm really glad you're on here.
@scalzi my block finger is strong, and quick
@scalzi I guess it is that authors spend too much time understanding the meaning behind their words that they don’t have the spoons to put that effort in their off time. Neil has a similar issue, “If you are flirting with me, tell me you’re flirting with me.”

@scalzi I get exactly what you are saying. I think everyone has delt with the same issue. People don't understand that the person reading a comment can't hear the tone in the authors head.

BTW, I am an asshole. Though I try not to be one online.

@scalzi wrong to assume new contacts are seeking new friends. Half of them are just showing off how clever or self regarding they are and are looking for people to be awed.

@scalzi Very true. It's a good policy not to tease anyone till you're SURE you're actually friends.

I don't remember everyone I've chatted with on social media. I could easily end up blocking someone for a jerkish "first contact," when we've spoken a few times and their name hasn't stuck.

I'd say teasing becomes appropriate when you've been chatting a while, and are actively seeking out each other's posts. Not after a casual chat or two, and not by way of hello.

@scalzi Perhaps there should be a more comprehensive set of warnings given during an extended onboarding process.

A lot of people are only used to conversing with a fairly narrow group of people from the same narrow location. They have never met people who are experts in any field, they have no experience of critical thinking.

And that is how we get a person who works as a Walmart greeter telling someone who worked in the MIT AI lab what they wrote about ChatGPT is stupid.

On sarcasm, I find a lot of people make a sarcastic post and then berate other people for being so stupid to believe anyone could believe what the Republican candidate for Arizona Governor (for instance) said to an adoring crowd of 5,000 to rapturous applause.

I have not flipped the bird yet, I am still on Twitter to see what I can learn from the stress testing. But it is getting mighty difficult to use with my feed being full of people who first respond to one of my posts saying I am obviously stupid and unqualified and then when I respond pointing out I have a degree from the nuclear physics department, Oxford, they start attacking me for waving my credentials around after they just demanded them.

[*] The degree isn't in nuclear physics but actually rather more relevant to discussing the feasibility of new nuclear designs.

@scalzi Coming from an Italian family where the default of "I love you" is a not always gentle ribbing, and having a less than NT understanding of the universe, it took a long time to really grasp that last part and integrate it.

"Why do people hate me when I'm just telling them I like them?" Because it sounds like you're being a jerk. It can feel insincere to just be cordial and professional with people, but it's always a good starting point.

@scalzi Just finished "The Last Colony." Your characters in "Old Man's War" series are so good. I wish I could have Perry's insight into other people.
@scalzi It's nice to see you here!!