@shoq I think that because of people and organizations being able to curate their own local instances this will be a lot more common.
I can't wait to see if any momentum comes of the suggestion to allow people to follow another server's entire local timeline. I'd love to be able to follow *@nasa.social for instance.
@ShredderFeeder @shoq @skastodon
I'd love to be able to follow @skastodon.com but I don't really want to change to that instance.
No worries! For how, you can just follow the hashtag #ska, and go through our directory to find some good people to follow.
Also, see if your admin wants to set up a relay to Skastodon.
No worries! For how, you can just follow the hashtag #ska, and go through our directory to find some good people to follow.
Also, see if your admin wants to set up a relay to Skastodon.
+1 to Jeff. It’s about having the freedom of choice. As @elk - the latest Mastodon Web Client in town - replied to me in another thread, “It’s great to be able to choose.”
https://mastindia.co/@[email protected]/posts/ARJH4mRatKDbjdwJrU
Why is anyone using an app to access a #freesoftware project like #Mastodon that's free and doesn't track users or violate #privacy?
Wouldn't it make more sense to focus that effort on #mobileweb and let everyone use the same interface regardless of platform? The way the web intended.
@ParanoidFactoid @shoq The individual web UIs of the Mastodon servers will probably never be able to fix the cross-server follow/boost/like usability barriers that exist now, because of cross-server web/JavaScript security barriers.
Native third-party apps don't have these restrictions.
Though, as a compromise maybe third-party web apps like Pinafore or Elk, can also solve these problems.
Wait. I'm on Mastodon.social. if I load the url:
Https://Fosston.org/joeldebruijn
I will not be logged in at Fosston.org and will be unable to follow. Correct?
But if I load:
Https://mastodon.social/@joeld[email protected]
I will get your profile and I can follow from my home server.
What's the problem?
@ParanoidFactoid @joeldebruijn @shoq Well, probably not actually the Kerberos protocol, as it requires a trusted third party, i.e. a centralized server, which of something you cannot have in a decentralized system like Mastodon.
But maybe you could build something on top of the OAuth or OpenID protocols.
@ParanoidFactoid @shoq Both mobile and desktop browsers have the same restrictions. In general they store data for each web site separately in a way that makes it hard to write browser-only apps that seamlessly talk to multiple web sites.
Because each Mastodon server's built-in web UI is at a different web site, it is hard to create frictionless user flows that span across different Mastodon servers.
@shoq A lot of people (myself included) don't want a new network, we want a Twitter replacement. Imo Twitter lasted so long because the formula was so good. Short messages, broadcast to everyone, allowing replies that are equal to posts (in terms of replying, retweeting, etc.).
I don't care about the future of social networking, I've only ever extensively used Twitter because it's better for me.
@shoq I don't disagree, but that means some kind of "alternative" to the "Alternative to twitter" use case needs to start being broadcast. Something pithy that folks can grasp (read: tech journalism can't casually malign due to status quo relationships and more general audiences can wrap their heads around with a de minimus of effort).
Not impossible, but I'd argue still not facile.
@shoq IMO, we're in an unusual situation with the fediverse because software is so far ahead of user practice. Normally, users hack new uses then software follows. Here, we have the tools to integrate short-blogging, long-blogging, photo feeds, music playlists, video... but adoption and integration by practice lags.
I haven't yet seen someone promote their podcast on Castopod or music album on Funkwhale or photo essay on PixelFed or video short on PeerTube or...
@shoq Agreed. But I also think that decentralization in general, and its implications for the fragmentation of social/power structures, is a topic many average users are not interested into. Not now, at least.
The internet/web was decentralized by design but the centralization of web2 made things a lot easier for (relatively) less tech people. We should not underestimate this.
But yes, the evolutions of platforms like Mastodon is a big chance not to be missed.