Happy New Year.
Remember: There is nothing natural or inevitable about extreme inequality; it’s the result of an economic system that values wealth and power over human dignity and justice.
It doesn't have to be this way.
Happy New Year.
Remember: There is nothing natural or inevitable about extreme inequality; it’s the result of an economic system that values wealth and power over human dignity and justice.
It doesn't have to be this way.
@c0dec0dec0de @rbreich
+Assuming "Natural" = "Good" is not a good framework. We do a lot of things that aren't "natural". Living as a society as opposed to small tribal groups is "unnatural", agriculture is "unnatural", medicine is "unnatural".
This doesn't have to be a bad thing.
Nature can be as unjust as it wants to be, but if that is so, defying it in the name of justice and common good is the right thing to do.
@rbreich
Its thevresult of decades of bribes, its thevresult of laws passed, regulations dennatured, underfunding of regulators, depts emptied, donations paid to quid pro quo.
We dont need philosphy lessons, have the massive coercive corporations who don't pay tax, to pay a higher rate than a bank teller, pay living wages or be shut down. Let everyone vote. Lets stop making big mistakes and well see what philosphers say it means.
Dont burn carbon is more important other holy restrictions
@tofugolem
Truth, weren't we just saying this?
@rbreich I strongly disagree.
bear with me...
A lot of systems end up following Pareto distributions. long tail, chaotic, 80:20 rule...
It seems to be a very strong emergent behaviour.
And it makes sense. It's like the game Monopoly... The more resources you have, the easier it is to get more resources...
So it is natural... But that doesn't mean it's good!!! And it means it's REALLY HARD to undo...
You have to have imposed limits or friction on wealth and power. Imagine politicians agreeing to that?
So true . . .
The nature of money is that it flows towards power. Money and power are interchangeable - money buys power and power attracts money.
If 'trickle-down economics' were real then we would all have been rich from the beginning of human history.
But the opposite is true.
But mention socialism, and the redistribution of wealth, and people start foaming at the mouth.
@rbreich unfortunately, that's nothing but wishful thinking.
https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Pareto_principle
Even Jesus already knew this: “I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but as for the one who has nothing, even what they have will be taken away. ” — Luke 19:26
Iinequality results fr a limited map of #wealth & #power
1. The rich get richer when the poor get richer - this is the lesson of consumerism.
2. The powerful get more power when people sign on thru apparent free choice. This is the lesson of #democracy & its defeat of #totalitarianism since the #Reformation & #enlightenment.
3. Wealth & power in #modern era is achieved by seducing people with a service or product of value in a bottom up process. This is the lesson of #internet biz