1. This is an accurate description of oppo research and describes why oppo research did not discover the deceptions of Congressman-elect George Santos

But it skips over a larger problem: the Democratic Party's failure to invest and prioritize research

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/22/opinion/george-santos-oppo-research-dccc.html

Opinion | George Santos and how Opposition Research Really Works

A New York congressman-elect appears to have misrepresented extensive portions of his résumé. How does something get by an opposition researcher?

2. In Democratic politics, research is considered an entry level job that you slog through on your way to something glitzier like press

It's a task delegated to the most inexperienced and lowest-paid staff

3. Meanwhile, pollsters are paid MILLIONS to message test based on information that is already public to find the most effective message.

These millions usually result in ads about how candidate X "supports working families"

4. These messages poll well but do not break through in the modern information environment.

Research can provide information that can break through, but its seen as an afterthought

Most Congressional campaigns and many Senate campaigns don't have real research operations

5. I'll add that Republicans have long taken a different approach to opposition research.

While Democrats utilize recent college graduates and interns, Republicans generally employ experienced lawyers to do oppo, at least for high-profile races

6. Democrats would be better off if they stopped fetishizing polling and made real investments in research capacity.

The best pollsters value research because they understand it can unlock messages that make a real difference.

But it's not the norm.

7. In addition to a lack a resources, few people provide effective training on how to do political research and how to present it.

The process of creating a "book" described in @[email protected]'s op-ed is the same thing I was doing when I started doing political research in 1997

@[email protected] 8. The idea of a static "book" (which literally used to be a three ring binder) was outdated by the early 2000s

And yet, it is still being utilized today because there is very little innovation in the research world

@[email protected] 9. Final thought: While oppo research has a bad reputation it is actually something that benefits the public.

The public should have known more about Santos before election day

Message polling is just about manipulation

Oppo research informs

@juddlegum It certainly seems like the media had at least joint responsibility for informing the public about the candidate
Frank D’Elia (@[email protected])

@[email protected] Proof that there isn’t a press doing its job in NY. How was it that all of this information took about Santos wasn’t uncovered during the campaign when it was hiding in plain sight?

Mastodon
This attitude by the Dem establishment is exactly what I’m talking about. A research director for each REGION means that each is responsible for dozens and dozens of races. Impossible to do the job thoroughly. https://twitter.com/lukaske/status/1605965629009416194
Evan Lukaske on Twitter

“This is just not true. I worked at the DCCC in 2018; each region had its own research director with multiple analysts. Then we had an exceptional natl RD with two excellent deputies--one of whom moved to the independent expenditure w/ a team of analysts. Oh, and we won 40 seats.”

Twitter

Questions:

How much does the DCCC spend on POLLING v research

How much does the DCCC spend on COMMS v research

How much does the DCCC spend on TV ADS v research

The establishment and the network of consultants that benefit from status quo resource allocation is very invested in keeping things the same. So they don’t like this thread.

I’m not disparaging research. I’m arguing it should be treated with more respect.

Interesting that all the people objecting to this thread are Comms people or outside consultants. No one who actually does research.
I’ll drop this now but I think it’s interesting that there are a bunch on Comms people in my mentions telling me I’m an inconsiderate moron and the research people are in my DMs telling me I am correct

People seem to be misinterpreting this tweet. I am not saying that I BELIEVE research is boring or entry level. I’ve devoted my career to it, including on/for political campaigns.

I’m saying it needs more respect and resources https://twitter.com/juddlegum/status/1605955886152916993

Judd Legum on Twitter

“2. In Democratic politics, research is considered an entry level job that you slog through on your way to something glitzier like press It's a task delegated to the most inexperienced and lowest-paid staff”

Twitter
Dennis Yedwab on Twitter

“@JuddLegum I've been in opposition researcher for 30 years. This is absolutely true”

Twitter
Gehrke is one of the most experienced researchers in democratic politics. https://twitter.com/mikegehrke/status/1605968212792954881
Mike Gehrke on Twitter

“Some of my oppo friends will circle the wagons on this, but the part about failing to advance research as a profession and invest in it adequately is true.”

Twitter
@juddlegum That’s not been my experience. Research is typically done by consultants. It’s never done by the candidate or the Party. Consultants typically build up dossiers on potential candidates for years because Democratic candidates typically spend years preparing to run. So candidates that come out of nowhere always befuddle Dems.
So your point is correct, but the path is different from what I saw back in the day.
@juddlegum Too bad. Researching takes a lot of skill if you do it well.

@juddlegum

This is a failure of journalism too. None of the news media in New York ran a background check on the candidates for Federal office in the election? The fact the New York Times discovered this after the election says a lot about the New York Times.

@jimgon @juddlegum
Journalists saying it’s not their job to fact check politicians is like being in opposite-land.

@JJPeterson

According to The New Republic a small weekly called The North Shore Leader raised questions, but that seems to have been it for journalists.

https://newrepublic.com/article/169686/george-santos-record-democrats-media?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tnr_daily

The Holes in George Santos’s Record Were Just Sitting There

A combination of inaction and inattention allowed the newly elected Republican lawmaker to win office despite having apparently fabricated wide swaths of his biography.

The New Republic

@jimgon

So even had democrats uncovered oppo research (which I think is ethically questionable in the first place because it’s always been the Republican dirty tricks strategy), getting any journalist to pick up the story regardless of who uncovers it, is impossible, as this proves.

@JJPeterson @jimgon @juddlegum 1930s NYT ran articles with headlines extolling Mr Hitler as doing an amazing job reviving the moribund German economy.

My late mother remembers reading about the dynamic Mr Hitler. Years later, her younger brother (442nd RCT) stumbled upon Dachau satellite camps filled with "walking skeletons."

@juddlegum
Journobros demanding democrats do their job is why democracy is dying. Totally unsurprising take from a member of the laziest , most unethical, value-free generation of journalists ever born. You all let Chuck Todd redefine journalism so you never have to do anything hard or have mean people say bad things about you. I know you’re better than most, but this is inane, the constitution envisioned your colleagues weren’t so cynical and lazy.
@juddlegum This thread makes you look pretty lazy. In addition to the fact that most democratic research is outsourced to experienced and specialized consultants, Tyson’s op-ed was clearly about the specific attacks on the DCCC’s research (by people who do not understand what it is). Democratic research is a complicated network of talented and experienced individuals who have had a much bigger impact on the outcomes of campaigns than you would expect…
@juddlegum and while it is true that it is underfunded and researchers are underpaid, if you think democratic research is a way station for ambitious operatives who write static books and then move on, you are wrong. Research ranges trackers to experts on disclosure laws in different jurisdictions who do more work on holding republicans to account for their corruption than any other group
@juddlegum. The bigger question is why reporters suddenly discovered this story only after the election. Reporting this is more their job than it is that of any candidate or Party.
@juddlegum truly happy you are here. I left twitter and missed your posts
@juddlegum Good thread. Analysis must also include GOP's pipeline to their base's heads via right wing media. The GOP knows if they do their oppo well, they can immediately innoculate their base against all comers. The Dems don't have that option, so their oppo may have less immediate purpose than the GOP's. But you'd have to do research to support that idea I suppose.
@juddlegum is he even a legal american citizen?
@juddlegum the problem is that democratic and leaning voters listen to every scandal even if irrelevant ( think hunter Biden). Republicans don’t care ( grab ‘‘em by the pussy)
@juddlegum one of the worst examples of dems punishing for the least infraction was al Franken.
@juddlegum you're a journalist. This is your job. You're not a stenographer. You failed. It's on you.