The reason Mastodon and the Fediverse is spread out on so many servers is it protects it from being taken over by anyone. Not even the richest can buy this place.

Centralised services like Twitter are incredibly easy to buy out. If you move from Twitter to another centralised service, sooner or later that will get bought out too.

The point of the Fediverse is to break this buyout cycle, to let people be permanently in control of their accounts. More info here:

➡️ https://fedi.tips/mastodon-and-the-fediverse-beginners-start-here/#whyisthefediverseonsomanyseparateservers

Mastodon and the Fediverse: Beginners Start Here | Fedi.Tips – An Unofficial Guide to Mastodon and the Fediverse

An unofficial guide to using Mastodon and the Fediverse

p.s. Mastodon is part of the Fediverse, more info here:

➡️ https://fedi.tips/mastodon-and-the-fediverse-beginners-start-here/#whatismastodon

You can move your account and keep your followers & follows if a server is closing down:

➡️ https://fedi.tips/how-to-use-mastodon-and-the-fediverse-basic-tips/#WhatIfAServerClosesDown

For full independence, it is much cheaper and easier than you think to start your own server, more info here:

➡️ https://growyourown.services/grow-your-own-social-network/

The smallest Mastodon server starts from around $8 a month, and that includes the hosting company doing all the technical stuff for you.

Mastodon and the Fediverse: Beginners Start Here | Fedi.Tips – An Unofficial Guide to Mastodon and the Fediverse

An unofficial guide to using Mastodon and the Fediverse

no way to move your content though?
@feditips Not totally as simple as that, since some hosting companies don't have mastodon install scripts ready to go. Mine doesn't!
@feditips And yet 80% of new people are piling into about 5 instances. Decentralized you say...
@mike @feditips That's still 4 more than twitter had...
@mike @feditips as a #nontech #newbie. I went on and was offered only three or four choices of server. Doubtless there was some way to find mare, but I don’t know what that might have been #techglitch

@feditips

For the price of a blue check mark, you, too, can own an entire ̶T̶w̶i̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ Mastodon.

@feditips The average cost of acquisition for a server in the fediverse is no doubt much, much lower than acquiring a large centralized provider. Also, as I understand this model, user data isn't distributed, so there are still centralization risks for people's accounts together with these much lower barriers to entry in buying out servers.
@feditips $8/mo for an independent branch of decentralized social network sure beats $8/mo for a measly scrap of "skin" in some narcissistic billionaire's demented game.

@feditips a nice overview by @thelinuxEXP

Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed: easily replace Twitter, Instagram and YouTube

https://tilvids.com/w/7ec57164-aef3-4861-a33b-61dd7629faac

Mastodon, Peertube, Pixelfed: easily replace Twitter, Instagram and YouTube

PeerTube
@feditips People should realize how important this is. Even if you like the owner/managers of a platform today, it could all turn to crap tomorrow. I also like being able to call a union specific instance my home.
@feditips Elizabeth Warren tried to warn us, yessir she did.
@feditips Ok, so what happens if one of those servers is unable to pay their bill and goes under. What would happen to our profiles, posts and follows? Would we have to start over on another server? From scratch?

@therealduckie @feditips

You can move your account to another server (in settings -> Preferences -> Appearance at the bottom).

@Kathrin @feditips

Thanks, just found it under /settings/migration

@therealduckie You bring up a good point here, because that is a risk factor and absolutely something that could potentially happen to someone.

That's why it's a good practice to backup your data from time to time if keeping it long term is important to you, which you can do from the Import / Export link in your Preferences.

There are apparently some technical limitations which make it so you can't import your posts to a new account on a new server, but you can move your followers, block lists, mute lists, domain blocking lists, and bookmarks.

So again, it's a good practice to occasionally back these things up just so you have them in case in the unfortunate event you need them.

But, honestly this should be true of ANY service you use online and care about your data from. It's just that things have been stable enough in the past 15 years that we've all tended to get a bit lazy about it.

Personally, I also have found it to be beneficial to have accounts on multiple instances in the event one goes down, even just for temporary maintenance.

Things do happen, as sysadmins are very much human.

Hope that helps answer your question!

Know of any projects that do the backups automatically?

Would be nice to have a small python (or something) script to run to quickly pull all that down on a regular basis.

@nikkiana @therealduckie
Thanks for this. I go to preferences / export and see links to other data, but no link to csv of followers. Am I missing something?
@therealduckie @feditips Yes, but servers agreeing to the mastodon server covenant are supposed to give users 3 months notice before a shutdown. https://joinmastodon.org/covenant
Mastodon Server Covenant for joinmastodon.org

@therealduckie @feditips

This is true.

That’s why it’s important to chose server with care, or even, setup your own server.

You can also look for servers that has signed the Mastodon server covenant. That means they have someone else who has admin access (in case someone dies), they pledge to give users a 3 months heads up before shutting down, keeping backups and so on.

If the server is up you can always bring your account to another server.

Here’s a server where you can search for a server for you.

https://instances.social/

@feditips
In a world when anything and everything can be bought, this feels quite wonderful.
@feditips I used to be on a wonderful small social network called #FriendFeed. It was bought by #Facebook, then shut down a very short time later. Really annoying!
@feditips I love this explanation - I’ll be using this language when talking to friends considering getting on here. I’ve had a hard time articulating why the decentralized nature of this is so important.
@feditips When I come to a fork in the road, I always choose the road less billionaired
@feditips
That can't be repeated enough.
Main reason I'm staying here.
@feditips
How do you handle server security requirements with everything federated?

@casey37

The short version is:
- Authentication is handled by the instance that owns the user seeking authentication
- Untrusted instances get blacklisted in a process called defederation.
- Message/post privacy depends on trusting both the publishing and subscribing instances and their administrators. As such, nothing should be considered truly private on this or any platform that is not end to end encrypted.

Btw, the project is OSS, so you can audit it on GitHub if you know Ruby. =)

@cogspace man I wish.

Somewhat technical but never managed to focus into programming languages after elementary school introduction.

That's my only concern here so far is what happens if one or more federated servers has an issue, any warnings at least to admins?

@casey37 I'm not aware of anything automated, but it would be pretty straightforward to defederate a server that has been compromised in some way. Users could then establish new identities elsewhere or wait for their home instance to be restored from a backup.

Just as with email, I suspect that this will ultimately trend toward a few large well-trusted instances containing the majority of users (already kind of the case) and a bunch of tiny instances with a relative handful of accounts each.

@casey37 Apparently there are tools[1] that smaller instances use to piggyback off the moderation work of larger instances to share blocklists. This is one of the mechanisms by which defederation can spread through the network. There may be others. I have heard anecdotally that there is some system of magic hashtags which admins can use to trigger defederation of problem instances to those that trust them, but I can't find any details on it.

[1]: https://github.com/Anthchirp/mastodon-defederate

GitHub - Anthchirp/mastodon-defederate: Aiding small Mastodon instance admins by tracking larger instances' server blocklists

Aiding small Mastodon instance admins by tracking larger instances' server blocklists - GitHub - Anthchirp/mastodon-defederate: Aiding small Mastodon instance admins by tracking larger instance...

GitHub
@feditips Hey, so is there any change you guys and the people who run counter.social might ever make up so accounts from over there can follow the whole fediverse again? Seems like it would be a big alliance against Elmo...

@feditips Well, here’s hoping that’s true. Thing is, there are already very large instances and if a platform like Tumblr implements the protocol, it will – from one day to the next – eclipse even the largest one by an order or two of magnitude.

I believe vigilance is the order of the day… against corporate capture and vertical scale.

@feditips This is going to last as long as it takes for agglomeration effects to drive everyone into the one big instance.
@feditips what does the number of servers have to do with the complexity of buying a company?

@ryhutchfilm @feditips Because the servers are being run by independent people, and some of those servers aren't even running Mastodon software.

Buying the Mastodon company (that makes the open source Mastodon software) would have approximately zero impact on any servers other than mastodon.social, which the Mastodon company does operate. All other servers remain independent, and might even choose to defederate from mastodon.social in that case.

@feditips I mean there are downsides to this approach too. For example, security is more difficult to manage due to fragmentation and mods/admins exert arbitrary control over their instance.

@asdfasdfasdf @feditips at least on Mastodon I can choose which admin I want to deal with (or be my own).

As for security; 100 small safes with different locks will be challenging to exploit even if they are technically less secure than twitter or your bank.

@feditips And the reason we shouldn't all gather on one server with the people we want to communicate with
@feditips power to the people, vive le revolution
@feditips we need to do this with other social media platforms. Not sure if Mastodon can be the one glove fits all.
@feditips Centralized social media is a failure.
Elon Musk on Twitter

“Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll.”

Twitter
@feditips it is true that an upside to the federated approach is decreased risk of hostile takeovers. IMHO one downside risk: the trust and safety burden now falls on the instance owner volunteers and the end users. What is their legal exposure when bad actors start posting illegal content on their instances?
@feditips this is extremely helpful! i’ve been trying to wrap my head around the concept of what mastodon is and this explanation clears it up for me. ty.
@feditips we have to be on the run all the time.💨
@feditips YAY, power to ya Fediverse!!!!
@feditips have read quite a few #fediverse articles the last few weeks and this one sums it up best. Thank you!