If I think about everything I've learned about the world since I was a kid, the thing that would've most surprised kid-me is how privileged the median or even 10%-ile person with a "good" job is, e.g., what's the rate of tech folks at top companies who were too poor to get dental care and have crooked teeth?

1/1000 seems like the right order of magnitude for someone my age or younger in tech and maybe it's 1/100 but, at a population level in the U.S., seems more like 1/5 or maybe 1/10.

Where are all the people who grew up too poor to get dental care ending up? Not in high-end tech jobs, and tech is less highly selected on this than finance, law, etc.

I've interacted with quite a few interns and new grads at big tech companies and, among U.S. born folks, I think the rate of people who were on the U.S. Olympic team is pretty similar to the rate of people who haven't had dental care (IME, the Olympic team rate has been higher, but sampling from tails like this is noisy)

For a less extreme example, a large group of tech folks I was hanging out with compared notes on US high schools. My high school was ok (one random site ranked it 35%-ile among schools in WI, another one rated it well above median), which made it bottom of the barrel among tech folks. Most people went to high schools where basically everyone graduated, very few people were in the "reduced price lunch" income bracket, etc., which means they were in high-end high schools.

I don't think there's anything wrong with attending an elite private high school or being wealthy enough to live in a great school district, but the rate feels surreal to me. The thing that really surprised me when I looked at the data is how heavily top companies recruit from top schools and then how heavily top schools "recruit from" high income families.

The median student at a top school is > p90 parental income and even at a "merely good" school, the median student is > p80.

BTW, I consider myself extremely lucky to have grown up in the U.S., but poor enough that I have crooked teeth, lightheaded from hunger often enough that I had standard strategies for dealing with it, malnourished enough that I once broke my collarbone from from gently rolling off the couch onto the floor, in an abusive home where I was regularly beaten, etc.

I definitely had better opportunities than the p99 person in Vietnam and likely even p99.9.

One thing that feels surreal is that someone who's p99.9 privilege in Vietnam is really at the bottom of the barrel in terms of privilege for someone who grew up in the U.S.

It boggles my mind how much of a leg up the median successful American got.

Sure, it would've been nice to have an easier childhood but, by comparison to almost anywhere in the world, my life has been on extreme easy mode despite being considered highly disadvantaged by U.S. standards.

Another thing is that seems surreal is, given how I see privilege call-outs used IRL in the progressive spaces I'm in (Recurse Center, companies, etc.), privilege call-outs are generally punching down (https://twitter.com/altluu/status/1480701266695102465), often comically so, e.g., I've repeatedly seen people from the U.S. call out immigrants who grew up on < $1k/yr annual household income, but I've yet to see the opposite.

And that doesn't even get into the difficult of learning English as a second language, etc.

Dan Luu on Twitter

“I wonder if this kind of thing is also the fundamental reason behind something that's puzzled me for a while: why, in progressive spaces I'm in, keeping in mind that privilege is high dimensional, privilege call outs seem to generally "punch down", often to an extreme degree.”

Twitter
@danluu Hmmm, on one hand, sure, on the other... it really feels like coming from the assumption that the US is a most prosperous country in the world, which it is not. Having ok-well-off to poor parents depending on time in my life has not stopped me from getting excellent education I didn't have to pay a dime for and generally PLs education system is not geared towards replicating parental incomes through education. Hard for me to talk about Vietnam since I don't know that society, but growing up poor in the US is definitely not p99 relative to the rest of the world which has Europe in it.

@danluu I do wonder where you get your data for that statement. A rich Vietnamese has something like 10 years higher life expectancy than a poor American. What you describe may have been true when your family migrated and you grew up, but by now things are both better in Vietnam and worse in the USA.

Also, what exactly is you family/migration story? You have hinted at it a few times, but I'm left filling in guesses.

@danluu I'm visiting Vietnam with my wife, and I think this comment is qualitatively off. Most of my wife's family have government or middle class jobs; some of them have multiple pieces of land. My guess is they are around 95%ile in Vietnam (only 1-2 own cars). And they are definitely not bottom of the barrel compared to the US. My family all have decent phones, internet access, schooling, strong social ties.

@danluu
It matters how you value material wealth vs social, but I would guess they are at least 25%ile in US.

Part of this may be due to Vietnam's growth in the past 10-20 years, and your statement may have been true circa 2000 but feels qualitatively wrong now.

@danluu the compounding effects from wealth just seem insane. You go to the right school and have time and resources to study the right thing, which gets you into the next right school, which lets you make friends with the right person, who happens to know someone with an opportunity and so on and so forth
@danluu is wealth really the primary factor here? I'm obviously biased, but I find it that no amount of wealth compensates for severe childhood abuse--having more resources in this case makes no real difference to the agony that your existence often becomes. assuming i have stable housing and can get healthcare--something that requires only a relatively small amount of wealth--i would have much rather had, say, one person who stood up to the guy who beaten and sa'd me than zero

@whitequark I don't know that it's the primary factor, but find it fairly useful for mitigating various chronic pain and disability issues, which would be a lot worse if I was poor.

In terms of stopping things while they were happening, in retrospect, I think I should've rolled the dice on the foster care system (I thought about this a lot and didn't do it because I didn't know how to get almost any info on the tail risk there), which wouldn't have been a serious option in Vietnam.

@whitequark But I guess if the question is p99 lifestyle in Vietnam *and* a nice home life vs. what I have now, IDK, I guess if a lot of the medical issues I have stem from starvation or other abuse, then p99 lifestyle in Vietnam is plausibly better (this is below median U.S. lifestyle w.r.t. a lot of amenities and has a lot of risks that are worse as well) but if it's due to an unlucky genetic roll of the dice, then what I have now is overwhelmingly likely better.

@whitequark In the counterfactual worlds where I didn't have these medical problems in either instance, then I think I'd take the abusive U.S. upbrigning over the non-abusive Vietnamese upbringing.

I definitely have some not-so-great emotional scars from that, but a lot of people I know with more mundane upbringings often have worse emotional scars, so I don't know that I'd be that much happier or better adjusted or w/e if you swapped by upbringing for a random Vietnamese one.

@danluu It's interesting that that's the choice you would make! I do think that the way people respond to having emotional scars is highly varied and also is a skill one can learn and apply very effectively, but also how or whether you learn that skill is correlated with your environment in first place and a great deal of luck. I'm pretty okay with mine today, but I only narrowly avoided dying, and there was a *lot* of luck involved, so not relying on it feels like it'd be nice.

@whitequark I think it's impossible for me to really reason about what would've happened in the other case.

Compared to most people, I used to have an extremely high tolerance for stress. Maybe that came out of my bad childhood experiences, in which case that's an ok silver lining. Or maybe I had a large reservoir of capacity that got half used up in childhood, which would then just be bad with no upside. Hard to say which of these models is correct.

@whitequark re: the other subthread, I sometimes wonder what it would be like to have any family in my life at all. When I was younger, that sounded great to me, but the more I see how people's family treat them, the less good it seems.

I do know some people with great family relationships, but at the median, people are mistreated badly enough that they seem worse off emotionally (generally better off financially), but maybe my sample is biased due to my own weird upbringing?

@danluu I have made the same observations generally. I also know some people who have an okay family relationship but whose system of values is obviously fucked and very likely because of said family, so the mistreatment is externalized; that is in some ways even worse.

I've had one (1) positive family experience that goes above having basic needs met, which is my father inspiring me to love electronics and computers, which obviously worked out very well to me.

@danluu oh, I'm similar, and that's actually how I initially read your post, i.e. that you'd prefer to have an awful US upbringing to a p99 Vietnamese one because it gave you tolerance for awful conditions.

While morbid this is a line of thought I've entertained before and I do feel that the skills I got from going through utterly horrific experiences are valued tools that are likely to serve me well in the future.

@danluu I'm actively testing the "tolerance for stress and adversity in general is a learnable skill or something that can be habituated to" hypothesis; I'm under much less stress than before but I want to tolerate it better so I have more time that's useful to me, so I'm very interested in practicing this skill or otherwise finding ways to adapt. It's hard to robustly account for changes here though.

@whitequark Oh, I meant the post as something like "what are the odds of hitting, say, senior staff engineering compensation" plus maybe "having lots of intellectually stimulating opportunities" and I think, when I was born, the odds were much better for a very poor American than a p99 Vietnamese person (and I would bet this is not true today, but we won't know for 30 years).

I think one thing a lot of commenters (not saying this is you) don't understand is how poor Vietnam was.

@whitequark E.g., someone replied with how this didn't seem true at all in Poland and, well, I bet it was true, but also, in the year I was born, the GDP per capita of Poland was 50x the GDP per capita of Vietnam (US:Poland was 8x).

Average annual income in Vietnam was ~$200/yr-$300/yr, with large scale starvation due to famine; people who were senior leaders in govt didn't get three meals a day worth of rice (unless they were corrupt and stealing it). p99 lifestyle wasn't that great.

@danluu I was definitely underestimating just how poor Vietnam was.

@danluu oh damn, that bad, huh. I'm sorry.

I personally do not find that wealth helps a lot with chronic pain and disability issues. My partner, who is in state-mandated poverty (SSI), certainly has it worse, but that's less because of lacking wealth and more because of the state threatening to actively take what little you get away if you so much as get one wrong cheque.

@danluu In my case, while I can spend money to offset chronic pain and disability, generating that income in first place worsens it by almost the same extent, so it seems largely neutral. I don't even have time for anything I find personally fulfilling with the current job I have, so the main benefit it brings to me is being able to pay for my partner's trips from US to UK and back.
@danluu Having more wealth would potentially offset more things, but all of the options I've looked into which would generate more income would also definitely make my disability worse at the same time, so it doesn't seem like the effort is worth it, without a foreseen change in quality of life.
@danluu (By far the biggest impact on chronic pain and fatigue that I have is from pharmaceutical management of it, at this point, mainly tramadol/pregabalin prescribed by the NHS. It is basically free regardless of SES. Everything else is just paying somebody else to do a thing I cannot do because I spent more time working and instead of doing that thing, e.g. food. It's only worth it disability wise because this job lets me work on an ambitious FOSS project.)

@whitequark For me personally, the biggest expense categories are paying to reduce the amount of physical labor that's problematic for me and paying for things like physical therapy, which aren't covered if you have moderate income in Canada and are only covered for a very small number of visits if you have low income

I've been extremely hesitant to try opioids although doctors here hand them out like candy (at least if you're not on them; I've heard they can be hard to get long-term)

@danluu @whitequark IME, the effect of wealth in the context of public healthcare depends very heavily on: (a) the nitty gritty of implementation details of the applicable healthcare system (b) the specifics of the condition.
In my case, despite a fairly robust healthcare system (Austria) I would have died without the privilege of being in a position to question doctors’ (non-)diagnoses & paying to see >10 different ones until one was willing to diagnose.
@danluu @whitequark Now, almost 10 years later, it’s virtually impossible to get any meaningful diagnostics let alone treatment for post-Covid issues unless I pay privately. On the other hand, throwing money at the problem would have no substantive effect on the outcome of diagnosing and treating a broken leg or whatever.
@danluu I've been avoiding trying them for over 5 years and it's one of the biggest mistakes of my life that has resulted in so much lost time and unnecessary suffering. Tramadol MR/pregabalin specifically is a pairing that interacts pharmaceutically to make tramadol much more effective and the habituation much slower, so in practical terms, I can stay on the same dose for a year, take a 3 day break to reset tolerance, then repeat indefinitely.
@danluu I've never been able to work full time in my life before getting on tramadol/pregabalin; chronic pain from fibromyalgia wasn't the *only* issue but it was on the critical path and now that it's cleared it has made my life better in more ways I can describe. I'm still in substantial to severe pain daily, of course; it's just that it no longer overwhelmingly defines my every waking moment, as it did before.
@danluu Another option I've been looking into is low dose naltrexone and ganglion block, both of which are very promising, and both theoretically available in the UK, but the amount of effort to get those treatments just doesn't seem worth it right now given how much time my job takes and how effective the meds I'm on are. The benefit is that if they work I wouldn't need to stay on an exact 12 hour spaced schedule to remain able to do my job.

@whitequark Thanks for the comments on specific painkillers. I haven't looked into what I'd want to do, but doctors generally offer up T3s and, most recently, in the hospital (outpatient), one handed me a bunch of Dilaudid / Hydromorphone which I'd never heard of, but on looking it up, seemed like an even worse idea than taking T3s all the time for chronic pain.

I don't know that I'll do anything with this at the moment, but it gives me a starting point if/when I go down this route.

@danluu Oh yeah, can't imagine how either of those options would go over well for you.

In a perfect world where I can get any medication I would try LDN first. Counterintuitively, LDN can actually be combined with tramadol (despite the fact that it's used in opioid overdose; it's a mixed agonist-antagonist so in low doses it acts in the other direction), and it's a combination that some people use when, like with me, tramadol is a good short to medium term option.

@danluu You will probably find yourself with doctors suggesting SSRIs and TCAs. Personally I would rather experience acute opioid withdrawal every week than be on an SSRI or a TCA, but I think some of that is my personal hypersensitivity to these drugs. It's unclear why they would work for pain, and while they do work for some people, I see it as really a much more of a "I don't want to treat you" option than a serious treatment in many, maybe most, cases.

Good luck

@danluu it is wild how efficient schools are as intergenerational class replicators, along so many axes
@danluu A 100% death tax won’t even come close to fixing this disparity but it’d be a good start (still impossible to implement).

@danluu I listened to some podcasts recently with people in the same cohort as me and a major difference between us was that people trusted and expected them to achieve things whereas for me it’s mostly been having to prove people wrong. That was wild to realize.

Also a significant number of people I hung out with in Amsterdam didn’t have to pay rent and probably still don’t. That explains a lot.

@danluu What year did you graduate? I ask because I'm in a similar tech career, graduated university in 1998, and my high school was well below Texas median, graduated *far* less than 100%, had a number of poor folks getting help with lunch, etc.

I didn't *think* that was unusual where I worked, but maybe it was? It was fairly unusual at CMU, where I went to school.

@codefolio I was only a bit later than you, but the room I was in when we compared notes was mostly a lot younger than me. I would guess median experience was a few years or so and everyone in the room but me had a good idea how much tech jobs paid when they were getting into it and they'd all managed to get into a "prestigious" place. I'm not sure if that changes things, but it seems like it probably does?

@codefolio At my first job, a non-prestigious company where the median age of a logic/verification/ucode/circuit engineer when I joined seemed like it was 55 or so, there was a lot more variation in social background (though there was less demographic variation — almost everyone was a white man)

I suspect it's not a coincidence that the one non-prestigious company I worked for is also the one company where it wasn't the case that basically all of the U.S.-born tech folks had perfect teeth, etc.

@danluu I suspect you're right about age. I think my year was one of the last ones where it wasn't clear that "computer programmer" was going to be a particularly good lifetime job (and then it was unclear again for a little while during the dot-com crash.)

You probably got a lot more competition and push from the parents after my age. For the class of '98, it wasn't clear that you were trying for something at least as valuable as an accounting degree/job.

@danluu Amusingly, my teeth are pretty wonky. But I don't get to claim it's from lack of privilege. I was raised as one of those weird rural rich people where we didn't have much anybody else we cared to impress.

I didn't get into computer programming because I wanted a high-prestige job, or because anybody around me really knew anything about it. I just decided on a weird fixation and it turned out to make a bunch of money.

I assume people like me are rarer in recent years.

@codefolio @danluu i started uni in 2005 at the trough of the tech bubbles (and graduated during Great Recession).

at the time iirc we had declining comp sci enrolment, and this is weighted by attending a commuter school in a big city but

most of us were 1st or 2nd gen immigrants hoping to score a Good Job (ie middle class work at a bank or insurance company). nobody thought of getting rich quick.

can’t imagine what it’s like for kids today!