Escalation isn’t a dirty word. Sometimes teams disagree because they have different priorities or weigh tradeoffs differently.
Asking leadership to weigh in with guidance is the right thing to do. Your job is to frame the options and reason for misalignment.
Indecision kills.
I also remember that NYTimes had similar problem, but there the issue was more that the Times was posting too much that only a handful got impressions.
And of course there's the issue of which countries follow Musk: if he has 50M followers outside US, they might filter him out due to language
@doga Besides the popcorn of people telling Musk he's jumped the shark, I thought the observation that his tweets only get 10K impressions compared to followers interesting. Reminded me of your observation that ML pipeline was missing a bunch of impressions / engagement.
https://www.platformer.news/p/elon-musk-fires-a-top-twitter-engineer
Even though they're technically not contradictory, I'm not sure how to reconcile the following two things:
1. Nearly every time an outsider says that people are doing X stupidly and could do way better, they're wrong for boring reasons that are obvious to any insider.
2. It seems fairly easy* to find huge wins as an outsider.
At some level, maybe this is like https://danluu.com/p95-skill/, where the median player in an objective-based game regularly loses because they don't touch the objective, but
Dare Obasanjo
Rian van der Merwe
Dan Luu
Anna Hughes