The FTX hearing by the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs starts shortly. I'll be livetooting it here, and will be publishing a recap of it in my newsletter later.

Hearing stream: https://banking.senate.gov/hearings/crypto-crash-why-the-ftx-bubble-burst-and-the-harm-to-consumers
Newsletter:https://newsletter.mollywhite.net/

I'll use the #FTXhearing hashtag throughout, so feel free to filter it out if I'm clogging your feed or you'd rather catch up later.

Crypto Crash: Why the FTX Bubble Burst and the Harm to Consumers | United States Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

The Official website of The United States Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

Statements by witnesses—Prof. Hilary Allen, Kevin O'Leary, Jennifer J. Schulp, and Ben McKenzie—have already been published at the link above.

#FTXhearing

Sen. Brown (D-OH) opens with a very critical statement, where he talks about Facebook's Libra project (shut down by gov't.) which he describes as a "shiny tool" to try to extract money from consumers.

#FTXhearing

"Crypto doesn't get a free pass because it's shiny and bright, or because venture capitalists think it might change the world." – Sen. Brown

Brown urges that this hearing is not just about FTX, but will focus on the crypto industry and consumer protection.

#FTXhearing

Sen. Toomey (R-PA) says largely the opposite to Brown, and echoes the crypto industry's line that we must separate FTX's wrongdoing from all this promise that supposedly exists in the industry.

#FTXhearing

"There's nothing intrinsically good or evil about software, it's about what people do with it... Code committed no crime..." – Sen. Toomey

😮‍💨

#FTXhearing

Toomey says some Senators have suggested "pausing cryptocurrency" while hearings go on.

#FTXhearing

The crypto industry clearly has a strong spokesperson and salesman in Senator Toomey.

#FTXhearing

Sen. Brown introduces the witnesses. Prof. Hilary Allen and Ben McKenzie Schenkkan (better known as Ben McKenzie) will be critical of crypto; Kevin O'Leary and Jennifer Schulp are both pro-crypto.

#FTXhearing

First up is Prof. Hilary Allen. Her statement is challenging crypto's claims they are decentralized. She has suggested that "a ban on crypto would be the most straightforward".

She says that if legislators are not willing to proceed with a ban, then they must be very careful not to enact laws that would make crypto "too big to fail".

#FTXhearing

Now Kevin O'Leary is up. He was a paid spokesman of FTX. He's listing his crypto entanglements, and talking them up 🙄

O'Leary echoes Toomey in his statements that Bitcoin "isn't a coin, it's software".

This is a recently popular argument, which seems to seek to lean on "code as speech" precedence.

#FTXhearing

O'Leary explains how HE will be the one to do the detective work on what happened at FTX.

#FTXhearing

He characterizes skeptics as "entrenched businesses" who "abhor competition".

#FTXhearing

Now Jennifer J. Schulp, who's in camp "this is an FTX problem, not a crypto problem". She's talking up defi.

#FTXhearing

She characterizes various regulatory suggestions from the crypto-critical as "taking technological choices out of people's hands."

#FTXhearing

"Risk is a natural component of markets, and failure is often necessary for development."

#FTXhearing

Now Ben McKenzie, who says the crypto industry depends on "misinformation, hype, and, yes, fraud".

#FTXhearing

McKenzie is outlining how he does not believe that cryptocurrencies are currencies, and how he believes that every cryptocurrency is a security.

#FTXhearing

"In my opinion, the cryptocurrency industry represents the largest Ponzi scheme in history." - McKenzie

Sen. Brown asks if this kind of fraud exists at other crypto firms.
Allen: Yes
O'Leary: Yes, at unregulated exchanges
Schulp: Most likely
McKenzie: It's endemic.

#FTXhearing

McKenzie outlining the cross-pollination between execs at online gambling and fraud enterprise Ultimate Bets and the crypto industry: Stuart Hoegner at Tether and Dan Friedberg at FTX

#FTXhearing

O'Leary not great at yes or no questions. He claims the comparison to gambling are outdated and like early comparisons of the stock market to gambling.

#FTXhearing

Sen. Toomey pushing back on McKenzie's claim that all cryptocurrencies—including Bitcoin—would be securities.

Not surprised there.

He's having Schulp make that argument for him.

#FTXhearing

The argument, a common one, is that Bitcoin is too decentralized to be classed as a security.

#FTXhearing

O'Leary outlines the potential for blockchains, saying that 1/3 of the MIT class wants to work in the crypto industry.

Maybe not the best argument given that SBF was an MIT grad...

#FTXhearing

O'Leary is blaming FTX's collapse on Changpeng Zhao (CZ) of Binance.

#FTXhearing

Ben McKenzie's soul leaving his body while O'Leary talks

#FTXhearing

@molly0xfff I swear every episode of this Netflix series is more bananas than the last one
@molly0xfff then you can blame Binance collapse on FTX 😂
@molly0xfff haha, I’ll blame the 2008 financial crisis on the likes of Steve Eisman and Micheal Burry who made the unforgivable decision of noticing a financial bubble 🫧 Don’t look up
@molly0xfff there is a 0% chance this is true unless they had a really expansive push-poll wording on the question.
@molly0xfff It would be interesting to know why they want to work in that industry. If you removed the "possibility of getting lots of money from magic beans", how many would remain?
@loke @molly0xfff I think this is largely the reason. Smart college students want money. Film at 11.
@molly0xfff extremely curious how old that data is
@molly0xfff people with huge student loans surrounded by corporate doors want to get rich, news at 11
@molly0xfff 1/3 of MIT wants to work on scams. Neat
@molly0xfff But, and stick with me here... Is it fraud if all the cool kids want to do it?
@molly0xfff As an MIT grad, I am pressing X to doubt. I don't recall a whole graduating class *ever* being surveyed in a statistically trustworthy way. A push poll of an opportunity sample with heavy response bias? That, I could believe. One-third of an entire graduating class wanting to work in *any* single industry is sus.

@molly0xfff lol - the stock market isn't gambling?

Enjoying these livetoots, thanks for doing this!

@molly0xfff online gambling, fraud, crypto...
those are synonyms, right?
@molly0xfff Why hasn't anyone read "Web3 is Going Just Great" into the record? That seems like it would address a lot of the issues
@molly0xfff I am shocked, shocked to hear that an industry built on a fraudulent premise might be full of fraud

@molly0xfff Wait, even the pro-crypto witnesses are saying “yup, fraud all over the industry!”

OK.

@molly0xfff

Isn't the whole point of crypto to evade regulation and tracking? Beloved of crooks and libertarians alike?

@molly0xfff An unregulated speculative asset store and international exchange?

How can anyone's first thought NOT be "money laundering"?

@molly0xfff I love that pointless qualifier from O’Leary lol
@molly0xfff I have no idea how Ryan Atwood ended up testifying to Congress about how crypto is creatively using arithmetic to commit fraud but I am 💯 here for it.

@molly0xfff

This is still the best response to claims that it is all a Ponzi scheme.

@molly0xfff what limited thinking! The Kim Jong-Un Patreon fund does so much more than bilk yokels! It funds terrorism, international cyber thieves, contributes significantly to global warming, fuels criminal markets for everything from underage human trafficking to mundane drug deals, serves as an excellent tool for tax evasion, sanctions evasion, and *also* bilks yokels.
@molly0xfff Interesting, but I don't see how Bitcoin is a security. Don't know about the others, because I've never looked closely at them.

@MattChambers For those curious about a standard definition of a financial security:

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/security.asp

@molly0xfff

What are Financial Securities? Examples, Types, Regulation, and Importance

A security is a fungible, negotiable financial instrument that represents some type of financial value, usually in the form of a stock, bond, or option.

Investopedia
@dredmorbius @molly0xfff Thanks! I'm a retired securities lawyer, so I know the definition better than that source. I don't see how Bitcoin is an investment contract or any of the other possibilities. Where are the efforts of others? Now, for other crypto assets, the analysis may be different. For example, I think stable coins and tokens probably are securities.

@MattChambers IANAL and am green to much of this (hence the "dumb question" / "standard definition" toot).

That said, from the article: Howey v. SEC (1946) and the Howey Test:

[T]he court found that the plaintiff's sale of land and agricultural services constituted an "investment contract"—even though there was no trace of a stock or bond.

This case established the four-prong Howey Test, which states that an investment can be regulated as a security if:

  • There is an investment of money.
  • The investment is made into a "common enterprise."
  • The investors expect to make a profit from their investment.
  • Any expected profits or returns are due to the actions of a third party or promoter.
  • No contract requirement.

    "Efforts of others" might presumably be, say, "enhancing the value of the cryptocurrency ecosystem" (I'm positing language a crypto-advocate might use, not my own), and transactions of others of those assets themselves, creating a putative market capitalisation.

    Edit: Markdown glitch, enum. list.

    @molly0xfff

    Howey Test Definition: What It Means and Implications for Cryptocurrency

    The Howey Test determines which transactions qualify as an "investment contract" and would therefore be subject to U.S. securities laws.

    Investopedia

    @MattChambers Also: the four-pronged test itself constitutes the contract, if I'm reading things correctly, based on the above article and follow-up on Howey.

    @molly0xfff

    @dredmorbius @molly0xfff Perhaps, but I think a court would want something more tangible in terms of efforts. For so called stable coins, you can see whatever makes it stable as efforts of someone. Same for tokens. But for a pure cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, hard to see the efforts of others.

    @MattChambers Could well be.

    Former SEC chair Jay Clayton agrees with your take FWIW:

    In June 2018, the former Chair of the SEC, Jay Clayton, clarified that bitcoin is not a security: "Cryptocurrencies: These are replacements for sovereign currencies, replace the dollar, the euro, the yen with bitcoin. That type of currency is not a security," said Clayton.7

    Bitcoin, which has never sought public funds to develop its technology, does not pass the Howey Test used by the SEC to classify securities. However, by Clayton's definition, tokens used in an ICO are securities.

    https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/howey-test.asp

    Citing: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/06/06/sec-chairman-clayton-says-agency-wont-change-definition-of-a-security.html

    @molly0xfff

    Howey Test Definition: What It Means and Implications for Cryptocurrency

    The Howey Test determines which transactions qualify as an "investment contract" and would therefore be subject to U.S. securities laws.

    Investopedia
    @dredmorbius @molly0xfff Good to know, but why didn't the SEC bring more cases while Clayton was Chair?
    @molly0xfff ah yes, the highly paying business of *checks notes* warning people of scams.
    @molly0xfff I wonder what his MTTGF (mean time to Galileo fallacy) will be.
    @molly0xfff I bet he requires payment in cash though.