@hschwentner @philipmay @mstine @ewolff @carolali @bitboss @mo @janekf @oliver @ntcoding @TonyBologni @yellowbrickc @indu @nova @kentbeck @pragdave
No strong opinion here, but it seems like moving to a different server still limits options because you'll never have "everyone" there and topics will be limited by those who are there.
Besides, what does hachyderm mean? (I got a skin cancer scan on Wednesday and that's what comes to mind.) The only description I find is that it's a group of 'respectful tech professionals.' That's good. Still, I'd like to know more about why it's the place to be. (My choice for tilde.zone was based on finding a server that was accepting new accounts when others were closed due to heavy influx.)
@dalias As I said, I know that. Your continued assumptive comments aren't helping me, but thanks again 😅
@shiftleftist @nova Thanks. I know that. A question was possed that perhaps a group of individuals interested in some set of tech topics should move to hachyderm. My thoughts expressed the "why should I do that when I would still have to follow people not on hachyderm?" I don't mind doing so, but I don't know how that would "solve" the fediverse when it's not supposed to be "solved."
Context matters.
@VaughnVernon @shiftleftist @nova So, there are a couple of things that you choose when you choose an instance:
* Admin team
* Mod team (sometimes same as admin)
* Local and global feeds
The admin team determines whether the infrastructure is reliable and efficient.
The mod team can affect what you can say and who you can talk to.
The local and global feeds are ways of discovering discussions outside your follows, but can be useless if too big/unfocused
@VaughnVernon @shiftleftist @nova so to choose an instance, take a look at who the admin is, if they have any public info about how they keep the infra running, how they fund it, etc
Look at the moderators and mod policy; do they match with your moderation expectations? Will they allow trolls to make your life miserable? Will they cut you off from someone you want to follow because of some beef with the admin of that instance?
@unlambda @VaughnVernon @shiftleftist @nova I'd add a little color to that by calling the mod team "trust and safety".
Admins make sure the system is available, secure, and running well, mod team makes sure it's a safe place for its users.
I moved here because I have a ton of confidence in @nova and @quintessence's approach to governance.
@mendel @unlambda @VaughnVernon @shiftleftist @nova @quintessence
I'm going to try to simplify this for you.
If you like the server you are on, you probably shouldn't move. If you move, it's unlikely that your experience will improve. It's far more likely to degrade.
Slice and dice that however you like with operational excellence, trust and safety, relevance of local feed, etc.
@mendel @unlambda @VaughnVernon @shiftleftist @nova @quintessence
I am not on hachyderm.io, but from all of @nova's operational transparency, it's obviously one of the best. I probably would be there had I not chosen @SDF first and fell in love with the place.
@Cyriux perfectly put 💚
@hschwentner my personal opinion (of a person that still lurks in mastodon.social) is that servers tied to specific topics are too narrow indeed. I'd rather favour an open index (maybe on the wiki of the ddd-crew GitHub repository), that everybody can contribute their "DDD Profile" with MRs. Then it's more about the community driving it, i.e. mentioning it in conversations and talks.
My 2 cents.
@hschwentner @ewolff contrarian here...I love, practice, and teach DDD professionally, but I have no interest in leaving my happy diverse SDF server for such a narrow topic space.
I honestly don't understand forming server communities based around something so narrow as a programming language or modeling technique. There's so much more to us than that. My two bits. Take them for what they are worth. 😂
@ewolff @mo @carolali @bitboss @hschwentner
I just saw this. Thanks for sharing the idea, Carola and Henning.
Personally I think it is too narrow. And it would probably end up being a place for all kinds of technical questions around the tactical tools (Aggregates!!!), CQRS, and Event Sourcing. I agree with others that potentially requiring multiple accounts for different topics would be difficult to manage and likely information overload.
Is there a good way to deal with these challenges? How would WPS engage in this?
@wps @ewolff @mo @carolali @bitboss @hschwentner
Understood. What I meant is, am I and others required to have multiple Mastodon accounts? If so, how can the toots from 2+ be consolidated in one timeline? In my case I would want aggregation on my primary account: @VaughnVernon And how do I toot into the new one without using a different account?
If there are good answers for the above, how about a broader topic?
- StrategicSoftware
- SoftwareInnovation
- SoftwareStrategicInnovation
- SoftwareArchitecture
@hschwentner what about something similar to @javabubble?
In my opinion it's impossible to decide for a topic related instance...
Therefore I run my own. 😃
@indu @hschwentner @nova That's true. Twitter was a platform to communicate. Hachyderm is home.
I feel bad for being part of the invading force, though.
@hschwentner I would not do that. I believe #dddesigm should be an unbounded community. Creating and joining your own server imo is creating a socially bounded community. @yellowbrickc @weltraumpirat @trondhjort
Now if there is a @RuthMalan server I would definitely join that 🥰