So these AI chats are pretty cool.
One thing that's gonna cause some problems tho is that they sound really really convincing while sometimes being extremely extremely wrong
So these AI chats are pretty cool.
One thing that's gonna cause some problems tho is that they sound really really convincing while sometimes being extremely extremely wrong
A zillion ways this revolution is going to be great.
One way that's going to suck tho is in places where human interactions are a *useful* friction / proof-of-work. When it's not, those systems will get really overloaded
Few examples:
1. Online troll bots & fake personalities
It's going to get a *lot* harder to distinguish bots from people and much easier to create entirely fictitious credible online personalities to troll/harass/do crime
2. Persuasive letters by e.g. constituents to regulators.
Volume of (~sensible, unique) letters was a valid indication of sentiment. Soon won't be.
3. Ransomware victim communications & negotiations
Used to be one of the few costly areas in scale. Not for long
4. Places where writing is assessed for cash or credit
Going to be much easier for e.g. students to fake/plagiarize essays or other homework for-credit
Combatting that will probably eventually force schools and universities towards towards more heavy focus on proctored work (exams, supervised essay writing) (ugh)
Going to be much easier to create fake-news clickbait farms too for ~ the same reason
Gonna add one point to this, since it's easy to focus on the downsides. There's some great stuff too.
One way AI is going to be *fantastic* is for accessibility. Imagine, for example, tools that summarize pictures as the default text for alt-text fields, making it faster and easier to make apps and sites accessible by default.
Another is making cool learning technologies, especially for beginners. Turning text into example code and vice-versa is a great learning tool!
And enabling technical creativity, especially by young folks / non-tech folks.
Imagine kids can *describe* a level they want to play as the starting point for making games to share with each other.
So, yes, big change comes with new risks, but also no shortage of new opportunities.
Alas, like most change, will be hard to see exactly how those shoes drop and the balance shifts across society in response until they do though.
I think we shoudl rethink the Turing Test.
I think a much more valid test would be any AI that can understand & explain copyright law without exploding.
As the AI delivers the answer...
The first thing we do, is kill that damn mouse.
Nope. Which is why any AI able to competently do it would be more advanced than any human brain.
@AlexBBrown @Pwnallthethings 💯 I have a hard time putting my thoughts into writing - I know what I want to say, but turning it into well structured sentences takes a long time for me.
I'm great at explaining things when I'm talking to someone, cuz it's easier to jump around in my thoughts and still have someone be able to follow my train of thought. But writing it out is hard.
Would be amazing if I could say it to an AI, and it returns it in well written sentences for me. 🤩
@Pwnallthethings
I was at an event this weekend for a biotech company that uses AI to create novel cancer treatments. Everyone at the table was convinced this is a net good for society, and that the field of medicine is more equitable than other tech-adjacent spaces. I argued that, just like everything else, the benefits will split 80/20, with the lower 80% of the population getting only 20% of the benefit.
I believe that #AI will disrupt faster than any rebalancing across society.
I just uploaded some screenshots with text, and clicked the add alttext automatically, and it did a pretty great job!
Would be neat for people viewing the post to have the same button!
I asked of openai playground bot the following request:
Ralph Nader said, "Republicans stab you in the front." The implication is that Democrats stab you, the voter, in the back. Please show examples of republicans stabbing you in the front.
It puzzled out the Q and gave a good answer!
(Cont'd)
Examples of Republicans stabbing you in the front include:
1. Attempting to pass legislation that would cut taxes for the wealthy and big corporations while cutting government assistance programs for the middle and lower classes.
2. Attempting to pass legislation that would roll back regulations on corporations, while leaving individuals and small businesses unprotected.
(Cont'd)
(Cont'd)
3. Refusing to pass meaningful gun control legislation, instead choosing to make it easier for dangerous individuals to obtain firearms.
4. Pushing for deregulation of the banking and financial industries, leading to the 2008 financial crisis.
5. Supporting policies that would weaken labor unions and make it harder for workers to get fair wages and benefits.
@Pwnallthethings it would make it easy to add alt text here
But you just know some will abuse it for all the wrong reasons
@Pwnallthethings This could make adversarial image attacks fun again!
@Pwnallthethings
Have been thinking about this issue too, and I don't see how we can effectively prove we are humans through a software endpoint which is also available to a bot, unless we have a global/national complete record of humans identified with private/public keypairs.
AI is already capable of defeating our most creative CAPTCHAs.
These efforts are already existing in some countries. #Singapore #SingPass is actually this.
1/2
@Pwnallthethings
This will require also that some bits of the 'security protocol' be done in person in front of another human beings.
2/2
@Pwnallthethings
The educators in all areas I speak to are trying to get a handle on this.
Flipped curriculum (lectures recorded, classes proving comprehension in lab form) is actually how I'd like to learn if I was going to school again, and addresses this.
Unfortunately it also likely pressures people with learning styles that don't do well in that environment.
so you're saying we could automate discussions with reinstated haters on the other place
even more diabolical than shadowbans
as with self-driving, ai chats don't have to be perfect, they just need to be better than the average human