“To the extent that people remain active on Twitter, they preserve the viability of Musk’s gambit. The illusory sense of community that still lingers on the platform is one of Musk’s most significant assets. No matter which side prevails, the true victor in any war is the person selling weapons to both sides.”

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/why-i-quit-elon-musks-twitter

Why I Quit Elon Musk’s Twitter

Jelani Cobb writes about his recent decision to quit Elon Musk’s Twitter, a social-media platform that once represented the new frontier of digital democracy.

The New Yorker
@Jelaniya @Chanders I think this will be a core issue in the coming weeks. The migration is happening. The first transaction costs were met by many. But going full in and leaving twitter feels like a risk and potentially a real loss to many who spent time building a community. The long game is the real challenge.
@claesdevreese @Chanders Yeah but it’s like a rental community. The emotional attachment to the place may be significant but you’re really subject to the prerogatives of the landlord. In this case the new landlord is a real genital. Eventually the place will get so run down you’ll have to move on.
@Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders And if it doesn't fall apart? We need a game plan for if it succeeds, grows, and many ordinary people now find it easier or better to use without the crabby, vindictive, identity-driven left on it, you know? I would be careful how you play this. Of course if you want it to be part of a growing civil war, understood, just be clear about where the front line is and whose lives will be sacrificed.
@prokofy @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders it’s owned by Musk and priced out of anyone else ever taking over. His intentions are very very clear
@Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders The question is whether he deliberately breaks it utterly so that it is entirely destroyed as an organizer around everything from unions to the war in Ukraine - but useless even to follow Eurovision or NYC subway stalls while AI takes over -- or instead to bang it to shake out the leftists along with the bots and use it as a political organizing tool for the GOP to prevail. EG define break and takeover. His intentions are manifest yet not known.
@prokofy @Chimaera Already I can’t search for news on the sick vulture without the results being overrun with neo-Nazis and genocide apologists and people cheering war crimes. The date Twitter became unusable has in my view already arrived. @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders
@Sea_Dragons Yes, I realize. My TL goes like this now: [SL thing] [Other SL thing] [AI thing] [tech thing] [My friend John's backyard] and then all of a sudden: DOES YOUR SPAGHETTI HAVE PLUTONIUM IN IT?! and FOLLOW ME I'M A ORBAN GROUPIE. So I get it. I didn't follow these people. They just appeared out of nowhere. I think the breakage method is to inject streams of this into people's regular TLs so they go wild. I block a bit of it, or just log off. The vulture has me blocked on one acct, helps
@prokofy Since confronting bullshit at the sick vulture causes the bullshit to be boosted: "engagement" drives up visibility under the algorithm, which values volume over melody. It's no wonder the result is the promotion of outrageous and offensive content. It's just diametrically opposed to the interests of those who want information and to connect to people interested in exchanging facts.
@Sea_Dragons Does Mastodon have a policy of transparency on their algorithm types and uses and effects?
@prokofy Since Mastodon is both an open-source product (so anyone can see the algorithms used in it) and decentralized (so a lone implementor can't secretly add undocumented evils) there's as much transparency as anyone cares to demand. The Like/Favorite doesn't promote toots, it merely communicates appreciation to the poster. Reposting boots visibility not only by sharing with followers but with the reposter's server generally.
@Sea_Dragons Could you point to the page that Mastodon has about its *policies* and its list of cases adjudicated around these policies? Pointing me to a page on GitHub isn't what I mean. Transparency isn't the unmitigated good you imagine unless it comes with coherency and presentation of the sense and meaning of the set of data. I'm fine with just communicating with another user with likes and not having to enter what sounds like an expensive economy of hashtags and boosting.
@prokofy A description of a "policy" would be a rewording or an interpretation and is less informative than an examination of the actual implementation itself. The reference to a "power center" ignores both the distributed nature of the network and the open source nature of the project and the ability of those who would be administrators to make improvements for their users.
@Sea_Dragons There are a million implementations, flawless or flawed, of a policy. We need to see the policy. The policy is the glimmer in the eye of the coder's birthed algorithm. Lots of decentralized things with their own independent, autonomous republics have power centers. And I don't mean Russia. I mean the NYPL, a central entity with a system but branches with individual choices, where Drag Queen Story Hour is welcome in one borough and not in another. So does Center ban or ignore?
@prokofy The whole point of the federated structure is to allow people who don't want to hear about MAGA or drag queen story hour or the glorious extermination of antirevolutionary freethinkers of falun gong to join (or found) instances with policies that suit their taste. It's nonsense to expect this to occur in software. I would expect the NYPL (and other public libraries) to use accounts on instances (or host instances) that promote reading and the spread of reading and banned books.
@Sea_Dragons If people were content to just allow the other instances with topics or expressions they disliked or weren't interested in just to be, that would be one thing. But they want to cross over to them and exterminate them and port it to RL. So you have to be concerned about the amplification effects of social media and even federativeiterative to enhance RL exterminism. Because it has already done that on many fronts, right and left or in between.