“To the extent that people remain active on Twitter, they preserve the viability of Musk’s gambit. The illusory sense of community that still lingers on the platform is one of Musk’s most significant assets. No matter which side prevails, the true victor in any war is the person selling weapons to both sides.”

https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/why-i-quit-elon-musks-twitter

Why I Quit Elon Musk’s Twitter

Jelani Cobb writes about his recent decision to quit Elon Musk’s Twitter, a social-media platform that once represented the new frontier of digital democracy.

The New Yorker
@Jelaniya @Chanders I think this will be a core issue in the coming weeks. The migration is happening. The first transaction costs were met by many. But going full in and leaving twitter feels like a risk and potentially a real loss to many who spent time building a community. The long game is the real challenge.
@claesdevreese @Chanders Yeah but it’s like a rental community. The emotional attachment to the place may be significant but you’re really subject to the prerogatives of the landlord. In this case the new landlord is a real genital. Eventually the place will get so run down you’ll have to move on.
@Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders And if it doesn't fall apart? We need a game plan for if it succeeds, grows, and many ordinary people now find it easier or better to use without the crabby, vindictive, identity-driven left on it, you know? I would be careful how you play this. Of course if you want it to be part of a growing civil war, understood, just be clear about where the front line is and whose lives will be sacrificed.
@prokofy @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders it’s owned by Musk and priced out of anyone else ever taking over. His intentions are very very clear
@Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders The question is whether he deliberately breaks it utterly so that it is entirely destroyed as an organizer around everything from unions to the war in Ukraine - but useless even to follow Eurovision or NYC subway stalls while AI takes over -- or instead to bang it to shake out the leftists along with the bots and use it as a political organizing tool for the GOP to prevail. EG define break and takeover. His intentions are manifest yet not known.

@prokofy @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders any scenario envisioned includes the owner of that platform tweeting to millions on the eve of the US midterms to vote Republican because “balance.”

Bottom line: I understood I needed to get out once I realized the voices were coming from inside the house. He intentionally and knowingly amplifies Nazi rhetoric

@prokofy @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders BTW, this is the moment when I left:

“Kara Swisher pointed out on her podcast, Musk was potentially the one person who could solve Twitter’s long-term profitability problem... (Swisher, to her credit, later pointed out where Musk went astray, taking particular note of his tweet, which she deemed homophobic, regarding the assault on Paul Pelosi.)”

@Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders The Paul Pelosi thing was utterly sickening and while my moment for utter discreditation of Musk came with his Putinesque peace plan for Ukraine, this took it down way lower. To me, Musk buying Twitter feels like some big NYC realtor buying the site of an abandoned synagogue covered with hate graffiti and putting up a tower no one can afford called "Temple Apartments" (RL thing) or Pansophical buying Corsica S Coast in SL. Essence-and-Genre-destroying
@Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders Yet none of you complained when Obama harnessed Facebook to win, enabling the 14-year-old daughter of his supporters in my parish to phone strangers in Ohio and harangue them to vote, or when on early Twitter, Dave Winner helped out Obama by tweeting to zillions, "Everybody in the Northeast is a racist unless they vote for Obama". And a million other examples. This sort of thing never feels bad on your own side.

@prokofy @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders that’s some classic #FalseEquivalence

None of that is #hatespeech that invites violence

@Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders So you say. I'm all for trying Trump on grounds of incitement of imminent violence under Supreme Court jurisprudence bc I think it wd stick. Hopefully. But I don't hide the fact that it's not just the John Brown Club, an anti-fa front, but 300 other socialist gun clubs that are armed. You can use the word "and" without obliterating the fact that one side is far worse now. None of you complained when platforms were harnessed. Harnessing where it starts
@Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders A key problem on these services is that I'm not anonymous and my RL name is linked and therefore I'm opened up to anti-fa harassment of my RL Facebook page merely for pointing out a fact without getting all Andy Ngo about it. You're anonymous, however AND you live in the same town I do. But it's fine if we don't follow each other : )
@davidreinertson Say, do I write to you, like you wrote to Chevron, "I'm not a customer and I oppose global warming, but I'll follow you? That is, if my tolerance for smart comebacks grows after minimizing Twitter. It may not.
@davidreinertson @Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders I don't think Facebook is "fine" when, unasked, I can see Jordan Petersen in my feed and be harassed by faux friend requests by KGB goons who have named themselves after Soviet ships and never get removed by FB who thinks they are people. No, not fine. And yes, harnessed, by various sides, tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine. Yes, it's a war, even if virtual, that all too often these days materializes in deadly forms in RL
@Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders When I posted a harsh critique of @scobleizer for taking Twitter to Congress merely as a "tech demo," and said someday politicians I didn't vote for will have a huge one-way broadcast system where they block me and I lose my right to redress wrongs in petitions, he may regret it. He called arguing with me like "talking to a hair dryer". But I was right.
@Chimaera @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders As for amplifying Nazi rhetoric, Twitter as a platform and a utility does that on its own, even under the previous set of more or less decent engineers who didn't seem to overly weld their views into the platform after 15 years from my observations. Does he do it deliberately because he's a Nazi? Or a culture jammer like a common 4channer? I don't need to find out. But sorry, not evacuating those idiots so I can't see RL people evacuating from Kharkiv
@prokofy @Chimaera Already I can’t search for news on the sick vulture without the results being overrun with neo-Nazis and genocide apologists and people cheering war crimes. The date Twitter became unusable has in my view already arrived. @Jelaniya @claesdevreese @Chanders
@Sea_Dragons Yes, I realize. My TL goes like this now: [SL thing] [Other SL thing] [AI thing] [tech thing] [My friend John's backyard] and then all of a sudden: DOES YOUR SPAGHETTI HAVE PLUTONIUM IN IT?! and FOLLOW ME I'M A ORBAN GROUPIE. So I get it. I didn't follow these people. They just appeared out of nowhere. I think the breakage method is to inject streams of this into people's regular TLs so they go wild. I block a bit of it, or just log off. The vulture has me blocked on one acct, helps
@prokofy Since confronting bullshit at the sick vulture causes the bullshit to be boosted: "engagement" drives up visibility under the algorithm, which values volume over melody. It's no wonder the result is the promotion of outrageous and offensive content. It's just diametrically opposed to the interests of those who want information and to connect to people interested in exchanging facts.
@Sea_Dragons Does Mastodon have a policy of transparency on their algorithm types and uses and effects?
@prokofy Since Mastodon is both an open-source product (so anyone can see the algorithms used in it) and decentralized (so a lone implementor can't secretly add undocumented evils) there's as much transparency as anyone cares to demand. The Like/Favorite doesn't promote toots, it merely communicates appreciation to the poster. Reposting boots visibility not only by sharing with followers but with the reposter's server generally.
@Sea_Dragons Could you point to the page that Mastodon has about its *policies* and its list of cases adjudicated around these policies? Pointing me to a page on GitHub isn't what I mean. Transparency isn't the unmitigated good you imagine unless it comes with coherency and presentation of the sense and meaning of the set of data. I'm fine with just communicating with another user with likes and not having to enter what sounds like an expensive economy of hashtags and boosting.
@prokofy A description of a "policy" would be a rewording or an interpretation and is less informative than an examination of the actual implementation itself. The reference to a "power center" ignores both the distributed nature of the network and the open source nature of the project and the ability of those who would be administrators to make improvements for their users.
@Sea_Dragons There are a million implementations, flawless or flawed, of a policy. We need to see the policy. The policy is the glimmer in the eye of the coder's birthed algorithm. Lots of decentralized things with their own independent, autonomous republics have power centers. And I don't mean Russia. I mean the NYPL, a central entity with a system but branches with individual choices, where Drag Queen Story Hour is welcome in one borough and not in another. So does Center ban or ignore?
@prokofy The whole point of the federated structure is to allow people who don't want to hear about MAGA or drag queen story hour or the glorious extermination of antirevolutionary freethinkers of falun gong to join (or found) instances with policies that suit their taste. It's nonsense to expect this to occur in software. I would expect the NYPL (and other public libraries) to use accounts on instances (or host instances) that promote reading and the spread of reading and banned books.
@Sea_Dragons If people were content to just allow the other instances with topics or expressions they disliked or weren't interested in just to be, that would be one thing. But they want to cross over to them and exterminate them and port it to RL. So you have to be concerned about the amplification effects of social media and even federativeiterative to enhance RL exterminism. Because it has already done that on many fronts, right and left or in between.
@Sea_Dragons I think it's also important to understand that the federative structure isn't the tech mystery you all imagine; the habits of using it are the hard part. It works like the US or Russia, which are federations. You can ban abortion in one state and another permits it. You can have civil war in one Russian subject and another even has a president of their own. We get it. But it's about policies and where the power center is.
@Sea_Dragons I think there are times, places, and manners when you should confront the bullshit and other times it is counterproductive. Can you really change the nature of a machine with all its complex parts so quickly? I guess you can.
Prokofy Neva 🌻 on Twitter

“1) Hi all, after a lockout, I managed to get logged back on to Twitter thru this crazy, hard process called "Arkrose" which is NOT about a mere captcha & hone call. It is an arduous, frustrating repeated maze test designed to keep hired humans from hacking sites with brute force.”

Twitter