@yura A dark-themed social media or forum comment section showing post statistics. The top shows numbered replies (2, 3, 4, etc.), repeat counts (1922), favorites (3186), and various reaction counts (hearts, thumbs up, laughing faces, etc.). Below are further statistics showing 53 reposts, 192 retweets (with a number 2 next to the icon), 318 stars (with a number 6 next to the icon), and a smiling face icon. The username "[email protected]" is shown at the bottom, along with a reply option.
Provided by @altbot, generated using Gemini
@yura Isn't amazing that the only ideas or user cases people have for blockchain except for "destroy all the banks" (LOL) is just worse versions of what we already have, often spiced up with "I don't understand how thing works".
DLC! But now with blockchain! *
Art! But now with blockchain!
Music! But now with blockchain!
* Often accompanied by "you can use any item in any game", argued by someone who has never even coded "hello world" but is an "expert" on "web3".
indeed. Thanks for resharing that.
(Git answers "mostly yes" to several questions and is mostly a block-chain, which mostly validates the flow-chart with the only useful chain of hash blocks i've seen.)
@yura Jokes aside, it's much more accurate to have a serial chain of something like 20 different criteria where only the final one ends in "yes". Including but very much not limited to:
- Are you an academic expert in both distributed systems and crypto(graphy)? (yes: continue)
- Have you exhausted the many, MANY alternate solutions to decentralization and distribution of trust? (a long series of "can you relax X assumption? no: continue")?
- Will you integrate and support explicit protections (both technical and socioeconomic) into the system that help preserve transparancy, traceability, accountability, revocation? (yes: continue)
And, most importantly:
- Do you live 30 years in the future where the tooling and overall ecosystem for using blockchains responsibly for production applications even exists? (effectively ends in no)
In his 2008 white paper that first proposed bitcoin, the anonymous Satoshi Nakamoto concluded with: “We have proposed a system for electronic transactions without relying on trust.” He was referring to blockchain, the system behind bitcoin cryptocurrency. The circumvention of trust is a great promise, but it’s just not true. Yes, bitcoin eliminates certain trusted intermediaries that are inherent in other payment systems like credit cards. But you still have to trust bitcoin—and everything about it. Much has been written about blockchains and how they displace, reshape, or eliminate trust. But when you analyze both blockchain and trust, you quickly realize that there is much more hype than value. Blockchain solutions are often much worse than what they replace...
@yura Have I ever been clear on what a blockchain is?
No.
I would strongly argue against this, although this is mainly because my definition of blockchain extends to things like git and mercurial as well. Blockchains can be an extremely useful tool for certain tasks, a global distributed financial system is not one of them.
@yura Això és perquè no coneixeu la @monedalliure
La pregunta és, ens cal una #moneda #monopoli de l'estat que per crear-se es genera un #deute, els #interessos del qual paga tota la #societat als tenidors del deute (generalment #bancs, etc)?
No totes les #crytos son #bitcoin, també hi ha la #monedaLliure #g1