@Ashton In the first and last time I'm ever going to say this structure of a sentence:
I thought Musk was dumb before it was cool. This does not strain your theory. 99% of devs I meet think sales is a problem to be dealt with, not a team player. The nuance of "sales is losing deals on this" v. "sales demands you implement this" gets lost in most situations.
tl;dr "Musk is dumb" still answers Occam's razor with no issues.
@mmasnick "Our organic social and CS teams got dozens of screenshots of our ads next to awful content. Replies to our posts with hardcore antisemitism and adult spam remained up for days even when flagged."
my surprised face: 😐
@mmasnick THIS explains why in the last few days I don’t see a single ad anymore.
That along with broken links, comments that won’t load. It’s like watching a slow motion train wreck in real time.
@mmasnick Of all the notable observations in that post, this stood out: “Ads UI is very buggy and login with SSO and 2FA broken…Campaign changes don't save.”
This is the kind of failure 99% of users will never see; you have to be an advertiser who accesses the ad console to fully appreciate how certain critical pieces of the customer (advertiser) UX are crumbling w/o adequate engineering support.
The bottom line is Twitter is bad for advertisers’ bottom line — and that is the one unforgivable sin.
@mmasnick They were saying months ago that Peter Thiel was pushing Musk to buy Twitter. The only reason I can see him doing that was if he wanted Twitter destroyed.
Yes, Elon's trying to turn it into a conservative haven, but he has zero self-awareness, and is getting high off his own supply as he steers it into a ditch. Thiel knew he'd fail and he's fine with it, just as long as the site goes up in flames.
@mmasnick Twitter is just a final link in a long line of big companies monopolizing Internet discourse, including MySpace, Facebook, and recently Reddit (Reddit used to have an open source version of their server).
Hopefully, with Twitter users flocking to Mastodon nodes, we will come back full circle to where we were 20 years ago, when Internet communities were not controlled by big monolithic corporations.
Most people in this thread seem to have continued using the euphemism "advertising" instead of the word "propaganda" [1]. #EdwardBernays, the "father of public relations" [2], would be proud of his success!
de-euphemised: "Interesting explanation from a decently large Twitter propagandist on why they've paused their propaganda budget on Twitter after keeping it running for the past couple of weeks."
You're welcome to correct any errors in [1], based on [[WP:RS]].
You've also posed a particularly interesting challenge:
What criteria must a paid advertisement by client X posted on an online social network satisfy in order to *not* bias the reader/viewer to be more likely to purchase X's product (versus a thorough, neutral, objective assessment comparing the rival products)?
In other words: what criteria define an advertisement that is *not* propaganda [1]?
Keeping in mind the #ClimateEmergency , a non-propaganda advertisement would also have to *not* encourage the reader/viewer to buy more products than are reasonably justified during this emergency, it seems to me.
A comment there: "Who cares if ads are next to disturbing content"
How does someone get old enough to post that and not encounter people at all ever.