@tomstoreboe @elonmusk And #hydrogen is VASTLY more inefficient than #electricity. If you're worried about #generation capacity and where that generation comes from, you DEFINITELY don't want hydrogen. #FuelCells also contain *actually* rare minerals such as #platinum.

I'll repeat: this isn't about "feelings". This stuff has been *extensively* studied, including in peer-reviewed research. Experts are strongly supporting #EVs for a damned good reason.

@nafnlaus @elonmusk I don't know of many countries that generate their electricity from a majority of green sources. Norway is an example of where power is generated from mostly hydroelectric dams but it's exported and we import dirty energy back.
Rare earth metals including lithium are finite if you didn't know, just as hydrocarbons are. And ironically deep sea mining might solve the shortage of metals but negatively affect the environment. So no. We're on the wrong path.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk

For God's sake, why are you acting like I didn't literally just give you a graph of where US power is generated and the trends of each power source? Here's #Europe's past and projected. And I already gave you a graph of #EVs' lifetime #emissions vs. #ICE. There's a MASSIVE difference.

You don't get to substitute feelings over facts. The FACTS are that EVs are vastly cleaner than #ICEs and #hydrogen. Period.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk Next: unlike the #platinum in #FuelCells and ICE catalytic converters, lithium is NOT rare. It's ALSO not a "rare earth", which is a specific group of elements not even remotely related to lithium. For God's sake, please stop arguing from ignorance and learn about what you're talking about before forming such adamant opinions and trying to override the research of scientists on the topic.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk There's about 12kg of lithium in a typical Tesla (large-battery EVs; shorter-range EVs have less). Seawater is 100ppb lithium. The oceans are 1,4e21kg. The oceans thus contain 1,4e14kg lithium, enough for 1,2e13 Teslas. That's 12.000.000.000.000 (12 quadrillion) Teslas. Exactly how many were you thinking about buying?

The only reason lithium isn't produced from the oceans isn't that it's expensive (it's only an estimated $5/kg - https://cen.acs.org/materials/inorganic-chemistry/Can-seawater-give-us-lithium-to-meet-our-battery-needs/99/i36)

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk ; it's that *it's so damned cheap onshore, because it's so abundant*. Nevada lithium clays *alone* have enough lithium to electrify the entire US fleet. And I'll reiterate: if there's anything that defines lithium product, it's how *little* impact it is compared to most minerals. Salar lithium is literally sun-dried brine. Spodumene lithium comes mainly from a single mine in Australia with super-concentrated, easy-to-get-at ore.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk And lithium clay is literally just digging up loose clay, extracting lithium salts (which can be done with nothing more complicated than table salt), and putting it back.

Again: you don't get to just substitute "things you feel" for *actual facts*.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk "deep sea mining" - "deep sea mining" is not a source of lithium. Current or future. You're confusing the *proposal* of *one startup company* (Metals Company, formerly Deep Green Metals) to produce *nickel, copper and cobalt* from seabed nodules. It's a fringe idea and their stock has cratered. And copper, nickel, and cobalt are used all over in your everyday life, and in your ICE car as well.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk God, I'm going to end up having to go into what batteries are actually made of, aren't I? Here, let me give you the TL/DR for now: it's no more exotic than the alloying agents, coatings, etc that go into your ICE vehicle's parts (and oil production itself).

I'll reiterate: your ICE car is powered by burning its entire weight of oil at 20-25% efficiency. These tonnes of neurotoxic and carcinogenic liquid per year are burned into similarly toxic exhaust & not recovered.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk By contrast, a large and rapidly growing (including over the lifespan of the vehicle) percentage of an #EV's power (see the graphs) is low/zero emission: #wind, #solar, #hydroelectric, #geothernal, etc (and in some markets, #nuclear). Of the fraction that is fossil based, gas is replacing coal. #Gas - lower carbon than #coal - is burned at *~60%* efficiency, with better pollution controls, and pollutants emitted far from people instead of ground level in cities.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk And again, vs. #hydrogen, #EVs take a small fraction as much of that energy energy to go a given distance. And don't use platinum, an *actually* rare metal.

So I again cannot stress enough: experts are not supporting a transition to EVs on a lark. They're supporting them because they're a *vastly* superior solution. And as the grid *continues* to get cleaner, all EVs on the road get *even cleaner* along with it.

@nafnlaus @elonmusk I see your graphs and yet they don't reflect the true reality in my opinion.
Up until now we are producing our electricity worldwide mostly from non renewable sources and this is because our demand is increasing. Very little has changed there.

Did you look at the amount of water required for the extraction of #lithium?

https://footprintfacts.org/the-surprising-environmental-cost-of-lithium-ion-batteries/

Lithium nor platinum are rare earth metals I discovered, however EV's use their share of seabed mined metals. All is not good.

The surprising environmental cost of Lithium-ion batteries - FootprintFacts

Lithium-ion batteries, used in most mobile phones have a significant impact on the environment that most people donโ€˜t know about.

FootprintFacts

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk " I see your graphs and yet they don't reflect the true reality in my opinion"

Wow. Just rejecting facts outright. Well, if you choose live in a made-up fantasyland, what's the point of even talking with you?

"Did you look at the amount of water"

"Footprintfacts.org" is not a credible source of information.

#Lithium is *not* found in any meaningful quantity in *potable* water (freshwater). It's found in *brine*, which is sundried to concentrate it. *Nonpotable*.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk You can't drink brine. You can't water crops with brine. Talking about the amount of brine used as though it's drinking water is absurd. Other minerals are also recovered from the brine. The remaining salts are left on the salar, and when it next rains turn back into brine, leaving the salar exactly the same as it was before, minus the lithium.

(And note that that's just *one* source of #lithium).

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk *Small* amounts of freshwater are used to *refine* lithium, but that can be done literally anywhere.

The amount of water used in lithium production wouldn't even show up on a graph of global water consumption even if you printed it out the size of a billboard. It's a meaninglessly tiny amount. ***Unlike oil***. And water is also used in producing ***every part of every ICE car as well***, but you don't give a rat's arse about that.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk "Lithium nor platinum are rare earth metals I discovered"

Have you yet discovered that you know bugger all about this topic, despite your adamant opinions about it?

Rare earth = specific category of minerals. Not actually rare.

Neither #platinum nor #lithium are rare earths. But #platinum is *rare*, while lithium is not.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk "however EV's use their share of seabed mined metals"

NOTHING uses "its share of seabed mined minerals" except for #OIL. Oil is the ONLY thing used by humanity from which a sizable fraction comes from the sea floor.

#Batteries are NOT made from seabed minerals. PERIOD. This is simply not in accordance with the reality in which we live.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk There are two main categories of li-ion batteries used in EVs: LFP (Lithium Iron Phosphate) and nickel-rich, either NCA (Nickel Cobalt Alumium) or NMC (Nickel Manganese Cobalt). #LFP is generally used in shorter-range EVs, while #NMC and #NCA in longer-range.

Let's look at what makes up the bulk of a #LFP battery as an example. As noted, it's NOT #lithium; a battery is 1-3% Li, & Li is, as extensively covered, one of the most environmentally-friendly minerals produced.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk The bulk materials are:

* Cathode: iron phosphate. Which is basically fertilizer. Just iron, the most common industrial metal in the world, reacted with phosphoric acid, one of the most common industrial acids.

* Anode: graphite (natural or synthetic). Same stuff as in pencils - just carbon.

The next biggest bulk materials are:

* The electrolyte - mainly organic carbonates (petrochemical products)

* The casing. #Steel.

@tomstoreboe @elonmusk Next on the list are the current collector foils:

* Anode: #copper foil

* Cathode: #alumium foil

Then you have the separator membrane, which is a thin layer of plastic between the cathode and anode in the jelly roll.

Very last on the list are #lithium and the various electrolyte additives.

There is NOTHING worse about the composition of a battery than the various minerals, alloying agents, coatings, etc etc that make up an ICE car.

@tomstoreboe You are constantly surrounded by the minerals that make up an electric vehicle's battery. #Nickel is a key component of stainless steel, for example (and indeed, the less toxic component - the more toxic component, #chromium, is NOT used in batteries). #Cobalt is used in tool steels and - wait for it - is critical for refining oil. Neither of these, BTW, are used in #LFP, as mentioned.

@tomstoreboe All of these components are produced *once* and then recycled indefinitely, unlike oil, where the *entire weight of the car's worth of oil* is *burned every year* for an average of 20 years.

Again: #EVs are not regurgitated from Hell by Satan himself while #ICE vehicles are summoned from the ether harmlessly with fairy dust. Your fantasy view of things is just not in accordance with reality.

@nafnlaus I don't claim to have all the answers which you seem to do, perhaps I have missed your credentials?
Anyhow do read this article explaining seabed mining and it's uses in automotive batteries.

https://time.com/6094560/deep-sea-mining-environmental-costs-benefits/

A Climate Solution Lies Deep Under the Oceanโ€”But Accessing It Could Have Huge Environmental Costs

At the bottom of the ocean lies a solution to the imminent battery shortageโ€”at a great potential cost to biodiversity and life on earth.

Time