Since this blog post was released, I've seen blue checks repeat these talking points.
I've seen them write, "The Fediverse could disappear tomorrow!"—as if one site has more persistence than thousands.
Or that if one instance crashes, the whole Fediverse follows.
It's all FUD, of course—a way to keep people on Twitter.
@atomicpoet don't forget the "Admins can read your DMs one!" like Twitter can't read your DMs...
Really hope we get super private DMs from Mastodon eventually though.
@atomicpoet The stupid article says "If your ActivityPub server shuts down, you lose..."
How about "If Twitter shuts you down, you lose... this scenario is not unlikely and has happened before"?
@reneestephen
Yes, that was my whole point...
I like passive/questioned statements, since it seems more effective arguing with those that disagree. There will be an attempt to answer that, then continue to question that answer until they either realize their absurd position or calls me a nazi/fascist/racist/whatever.
Maybe you should try it out? 😉
@atomicpoet "Operating at scale requires engineering for scale" is an interesting way to say that having a monolithic server is necessary to maintain communication platforms, when that line of thinking was proven wrong long before the advent of modern social media.
I wonder how myopic they must think users are to buy into this.
@webhat @atomicpoet
One of my lot stormed off back to Twitter outraged that there's no quote-toot function.
🤷
Guess some people care about the control and ownership of the world's communication networks and others care about how easily a link can be embedded.
@pre @atomicpoet the silly thing is that quote tweeting works in some clients, if they think it's important they should use those clients 🤦
@[email protected] @[email protected] One of my lot stormed off back to Twitter outraged that there's no quote-toot function. 🤷 Guess some people care about the control and ownership of the world's communication networks and others care about how easily a link can be embedded.
@webhat @atomicpoet
@arin_basu
Yeah, I think in the end people just don't like change of any kind so they come in looking for any reasons they can find to leave again, then they don't have to learn or change anything but can say they tried.
@atomicpoet both observations are correct, don't you think?
Question is how much ppl care, I know quite a fee object to crawling mastodon, and don't like search functionality, so they'd not agree that this risk is a problem.
@arjen Right now, with many federated platforms, you can download your follows, blocks, mutes, etc., then export it to another account.
You can also set up an account on another instance for redundant storage of data.
But also: why do we even want to tie identity to any specific social network or instance?
@atomicpoet Hmm. And here I thought that #Bluesky was supposed to be totally independent from Twitter… guess not so much.
I'd be more worried if #Twitter had ever shown any ability to launch new products or services. (As it is, they managed to take Vine, which was fine, and destroy it.)
Whatever. They have their research project, we have rough consensus and running code.
@atomicpoet They lost me at "with email, if you change your provider, then your address has to change too".
My good bitch, I have had the same email address, at the same domain, on a variety of different mailservers (and even third-party service providers) since 1998.