Desktop Privacy Notice

About the Privacy Notice Audacity versions 3.0.2 and earlier are not subject to the privacy notice below as they do not include networking features With this updated version of our privacy notice below (dated 28 August 2022), we (the Audacity Team) would like to outline the changes that will c

Audacity ®
@cypnk welp, looks like it's fork o'clock.
@brennen Yes, indeed. I don't know if there are recent viable alternatives, but with the recent licensing shenanigans on top, I can see at least a few popping up

@cypnk i think people probably aren't going to put up with this nonsense.

i will happily put a couple dollars a month towards funding a viable community fork or similarly featured alternative. it's one of those pieces of software i don't need all that often, but when i do it's great to have it available.

@brennen @cypnk honestly a small scrappy co-op of software folk could probably make a decent living providing supported forks of open source versions of adobe suite products and having a low friction "donation subscription" to the suite
@brennen @cypnk I'd put a couple of bucks a month toward a Patreon.
@cypnk @brennen I'm gonna be completely stranded without an audio program if I don't find some alternative.
@Owlor @brennen Never thought I'd be dusting off an old (pre-cloud) copy of Adobe Audition
@cypnk @brennen licencing shenanigans?

@abloo @brennen Basically, they created a "Contributor Licensing Agreement" which essentially allows any future contributed code to be relicensed as they see fit, not just remain GPL

They also said contributed code from authors who won't sign it will be removed in the future

Actual page on that:

https://www.audacityteam.org/cla/

Audacity ® | Contributor License Agreement

Audacity is the world's most popular audio editing and recording app. Edit, mix, and enhance your audio tracks with the power of Audacity. Download now!

@cypnk @brennen
It's like they're trying to commit suicide
@abloo @brennen I think they're hoping most people will keep using it until the changes and outrage is forgotten. Let's face it, most folks just want to get their mix done and won't pa​y much attention unless it makes the news. Right now, only us geeks are even aware that something changed
@cypnk @abloo @brennen Muse Group bought Audacity. I think they're going to turn it into a studio product by folding in some of their commercial features into it
@cypnk
is there anything left then? are those contributions a big enough part to keep the "critical fork-kraft"?

@abloo @brennen
@stereo It's a large subset, though I don't know which specific sections as I haven't looked at the source personally. I believe Muse Group intends to replace parts that they can't use with their own proprietary components @brennen @abloo
@cypnk ah, they ran that into the ground impressively quickly
@cypnk Also I am not much of an Audacity user, but this seems odd:

"Minors: The App we provide is not intended for individuals below the age of 13. If you are under 13 years old, please do not use the App."

afaik there isn't any adult/scary content within Audacity, so it seems strange that there should be an age limit.
@bob I believe this is preemptive RIAA appeasement which would make draconian anti-piracy enforcement more palatable. DMCA abuse has already made fair use a joke so the last frontier is controlling creation of the media itself
@cypnk Wow, it is far worse compared to what I imagined when they first announced they put Google Analytics in it (which was bad enough to uninstall it). :/
@Shaft Yeah, it's such a shame. I never thought this would happen. What a fall from grace

@cypnk they collect basic system info,

plus whatever the fuck law enforcement wants?

wow, okay. thanks. glad my audio editor will just spy on me whenever the cops feel like it. that's where I needed that.

they also legally have to tell you that you can't use audacity if you're under 13, because they collect info on you. which is like. okay. guess that preteens aren't allowed to do basic computer things any more because they're not marketable any more

@clarfonthey I'm sure the age limit is to make the spying more "acceptable"

I heard back from a friend who said he's still using it for the time being, but might be on an air-gapped laptop. At this point, a fork is the only option since the folks in charge are hopeless

@cypnk it's not just about acceptability, in the US we probably have the most comprehensive privacy laws if you're under 13. you basically can't store content for anyone under 13 without heavy restrictions and guardian approval.

so, that's almost certainly why they have the clause there.

@clarfonthey @cypnk

it makes perfect sense

• Data necessary for law enforcement, litigation and authorities’ requests (if any)

when you read the next line:

• Legitimate interest of WSM Group to defend its legal rights and interests

@clarfonthey @cypnk

> [...] in compliance with the GDPR [...]

Yeah, the website literally has a cookie banner that does not comply with the GDPR - no simple "reject" button, and even in the "I want to opt out" menu, everything is selected by default (I believe that everything that isn't essential should be de-selected).

That does not inspire confidence.

@cypnk Aaaaaaand uninstalled. Was barely using it anyway and I'm sure there's good alternatives out there
@cypnk "Data necessary for law enforcement, litigation and authorities’ requests (if any)" Is this even GDPR compliant?
@Arco I'm guessing more of an RIAA thing since copyright is a sacred cow
@cypnk Sure😑 , but I wonder if collecting so much data would even comply with the GDPR in Europe 🤔
@Arco I'm no legal expert, but I don't think it does comply. At least not without an explicit option to opt-out, which this doesn't have yet
@cypnk Here the github issue concerning this topic if you want : https://github.com/audacity/audacity/issues/1213
New privacy policy is completely unacceptable! · Issue #1213 · audacity/audacity

For anyone not yet aware the official privacy policy was updated on the 2nd of July and contains some very disturbing things, most notably under data collection is "Data necessary for law enforceme...

GitHub
@cypnk ... and the online safety warning is pure gold
https://www.audacityteam.org/download/online-safety-when-downloading/
They should rename the app Chutzpah, as they left Audacity long ago
Online safety when downloading

Online safety when downloading Audacity Team takes online security very seriously and works hard to ensure the safety of our users, but our efforts can only be effective up to a point. For your online safety, it is important that you take reasonable precautions. The advice below is written specif

Audacity ®

@scruss @cypnk Wow. “We might serve you malware links” is a new one I wasn’t expecting.

“The adverts are filtered to block ‘bad’ adverts, but occasionally a bad advert may slip through. A common form of “bad advert” is what we refer to as “the Big Green Button”, which is an advertisement that attempts to lure visitors to download unwanted software or malware.”

@cypnk wouldn't it be rather easy to block all network traffic from it? do I need SELinux for that, or will cgroups + iptables do?

@uint8_t Possible, but that's a tricky endeavor without being more tech savvy than the typical Audacity user

Also, there's the Windows and Mac crowd

@cypnk "don't use this offline (besides our spyware) app if you're under 13" jfc

@cypnk what?!

Does this mean audacity collects telemetry data now?

What the crap!?

@danjones000 Could be telemetry or, as I suspect, could be metadata on the tracks being edited
@cypnk @aral wtf is this BS? Is there a fork of Audacity without all the crap that even warrants a privacy policy at all?
@amatecha @aral Sadly, I don't think there are viable forks just yet. There may be in the near future so for now, it's probably best not to update
@cypnk @aral aahh dang, yeah I was worried that might be the case! guess I’ll keep an eye out. I’m not a super-frequent Audacity user so I don’t have a lot of skin in the game, but it’s still one of those consistently-good-quality apps that deserve to stick around!
@cypnk Assuming they do the same with MuseScore, anyone knows of a MuseScore fork ?

@loveisanalogue I'm not 100% sure of feature matching, but Ardour does some similar tasks with a number of plugins. But keep in mind it's a much more complicated program than MuseScore

ardour.org

@cypnk
bollocks!

thx for PSA
(won't update)

using compuers seems like a worse idea every day for people who want to be free

@cypnk uff…

> "The App we provide is not intended for individuals below the age of 13. If you are under 13 years old, please do not use the App."

So no more audacity in schools now. Who would have thought of anything useful kids under 13 could do with audio recording and editing software…

And all to to happily collect data from users.

@cypnk So I asked the question officially: https://github.com/audacity/audacity/issues/1213#issuecomment-873615759

And I already know the unofficial answer "No worries, children will use it anyway" and it's true. Children will use it anyway. And the privacy policy only exists to satisfy the lawyers. Just like facebook or tiktok or twitter. I expect more from free software…

It might also be a sign, that there is no sense in providing privacy policies that can simply exclude children.

New privacy policy is completely unacceptable! · Issue #1213 · audacity/audacity

For anyone not yet aware the official privacy policy was updated on the 2nd of July and contains some very disturbing things, most notably under data collection is "Data necessary for law enfo...

@cypnk so what alternatives are there?

@polyplacophora Audacity is in a Goldilocks zone for usability and functionality that's very hard to match. There are more powerful alternatives which are usually proprietary and/or are meant for different roles (like proper digital audio workstations). The rest are just too limited

I'm taking a wait and see approach and won't be updating my copy. Maybe they'll reverse course or someone will make a fork

@cypnk lol if you're under the age of thirteen, you are no longer allowed to use it (§ 3.1).

@cypnk
Doesn't this violate the GPLv2?

The GPL says:
"You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein."

Requiring the user to be 13 or older is an additional restriction, is it not?

@guenther @guenther I think that's to comply with COPPA, since collecting data from anyone under 13 is prohibited without parental consent. I'm not sure how that will play out in court though
@cypnk When the original contributors wrote their code and released it under the GPL, they gave children the right to use it. Why would that company now have the authority to take that right away, just so that they can collect users' data?