@Primo I think it's a bit more subtle: those who follow the tradition may not know the reason. It can have evolved on its own, with fake justifications invented later.
I can't think of any very good examples, but instance:
- Some religious food taboos (shrimp, pork, etc) that probably evolved because of allergies or diseases or for a more efficient use of limited resources, but are simply seen as God's will.
- The complex preparation of manioc that contains dangerous levels of cyanide: "Ask why they do this, and they will not mention hydrogen cyanide. They will simply say "this is our culture". " (from https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48859333)
@syntaktis @guillaume I propose different reasons for the vinegar situation:
1) they had use for vinegar - that's why they made it.
2)It worked, that's why they did it that way.
No need to call for tradition.
Once people understood the mechanisms behind it, they were able to develope new ways to make vonegar.
@Primo @syntaktis
Ah, if you're using "tradition" in the narrow sense of what we were talking about earlier (a tradition with fake justifications/beliefs/rituals attached to it), then I agree. I have not heard of beliefs like "you need to perform this silly dance in order for the wine to turn into vinegar".
I would says there are traditions of vinegar making, cheese making, etc. The process was not only repeated, it was refined over generations, even without any theoretical understanding, just by trial and error. It's cultural evolution. But again it sounds like we use the word tradition in different ways.
LOL
practices of the living-dead ;)
@fribbledom
so much yes!
...although, yeah, some tradition does serve a purpose and saves us from having to reinvent useful behaviour again, each generation.
But then again, the times they are a-changing ... somebody should write all those traditions down, and why we have them, so we can then periodically check whether the reasons still exist, or maybe we've found a better way to deal with the thing ...