First draft for a public tech development:

- Public money is invested in public technological infrastructure
- The organisations that are developing this infrastructure should be non-profit organisations - that is, they should not be privately owned, run to make profit or pay out dividend. (This doesn't mean they can have budget for experimental research, maintenance etc. this is all part of their day to day functioning)
- Ownership and decision-making should be with both the workers and the public and not in the hand a a few. Yearly these institutions have to publicly report back on their development (both in terms of output and finances)
- The technology/software developed should follow the basic principle of 'privacy by design'. No hidden cookies, data tracking etc.
- Such software should, where possible/desirable be freely available stimulating the use of safe and responsible software and pushing back on the monopoly of the big tech-players of today (Google, Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, OpenAI etc.)
- Open Source technology has proven its strength, especially for companies seriously committed to it.
- The technology/software developed should be done so on cooperation instead on competition - for instance in Europe many universities have very similar educational needs and it makes all the more sense to have an European wide developer that is able to meet those needs on the before described basis.

There is probably a couple more points, maybe I will write a second draft. This proposal should also be in line with an anarchist future society.

Have thoughts on this as well? I'd like to hear them!

#technology #tech #freedom #opensource #publicresources #tyranny #dictatorship #workersselfmanagement #economy #needsnotprofit #creativecommons #privacy

Workers habe the power to start change at the base of #production. Change that is market-driven doesnt make sense and poses consumer with the choice between harmfull and non- or less harmfull products. This shouldnt even be a choice and letting this change cone fron choice is slow and inefficient. Products should be good, durable workers friendly and environmentally sustainable.

If companies offer these as an option in a specific line, this is nothing more then incincerem if a company still pollutes with its other products, it remains a polluter. Change the whole of your production.

If workers had the choice, they would do so. There are enough examples where at the moment workers took over, this process of changing production was started immediately.

#workersselfmanagement #anarchism #socialism #anticapitalism #markets #capitalism #economy #socialecology #climatechange #nature #consumerism