Hey #AcademicFedi I need your opinion on something 🙏

I was recently asked to review on a platform I did not know: https://www.qeios.com

Anyone knows about it? It did not seem too fishy at a glance but their economic model and who is behind it is not entirely clear to me so I'm a bit wary of potential link with people with an agenda (almost got bitten before).
So I'm not sure I want to encourage people to use that can of platform instead of, say, @PeerCommunityIn until I know more about them and the guarantees that all the content will not be lost five years from now...

All opinions, feedbacks, or boosts are welcome 🙂

#academia #academicChatter #ESR #helpESR #askESR #review #journal #publication #scientificPublication #scientificPublishers

Qeios - Research you can trust

The Open Science platform reshaping scholarly communication.

Dear #Neuroscientists.. What is your suggestion for the highest "reputation", non-profit, journal, that you would recommend publishing in?

I've thought of eLife, PloS Biology, Journal of Neuroscience, eNeuro... But these are usually considered "mid-range" and not "top range" and my colleague wants something that's "top range", whatever that means.
(Well, there is Science but that's probably too much)
#Academia #ScientificPublishers #Neuroscience
@academicchatter

Following up on the #eLife / #Clarivate saga, DORA has posted a statement:
https://sfdora.org/2024/11/25/clarivates-actions-regarding-elife-doras-response/

extracts:

"This development reinforces how a commercial entity such as Clarivate, can, through its ownership of scholarly databases and indices, hold the academic community to ransom. Clarivate’s announcement is disappointing as it both punishes innovation in peer review and disregards the important role of authors in deciding how and where their research should be published."

"As funders and institutions increasingly move away from using single metrics to assess research(ers), the role of Journal Impact Factors is becoming increasingly irrelevant."

"We therefore support eLife and encourage it to continue its innovation and encourage other journals to consider doing the same."

Go #eLife, Go AWAY #ImpactFactor!

#Academia #Publication #ScientificPublishers

Clarivate's actions regarding eLife: DORA's response | DORA

The Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) recognizes the need to improve the ways in which the outputs of scholarly research are evaluated.

DORA

@jacomyma @tito

Indeed.

Here's an example of the nightmare authors face when they realise a "bug" (here a biochemical one) and put a lot of efforts in making things right.

"the whole #paper is wiped from the record once it is #retracted, including the bits that are still valid and useful."

This is more than 10 years ago, but I fear this hasn't much improved for most #scientificPublishers.

#scientificPublishing @academicchatter

https://retractionwatch.com/2013/10/29/data-artifact-claims-two-fruit-fly-papers-from-leading-uk-group-who-offer-model-response/