Bringt KI die Wissenschaft in Gefahr? - 3sat-Mediathek

https://www.3sat.de/wissen/nano/251104-sendung-bringt-ki-die-wissenschaft-in-gefahr-nano-100.html

"Es gibt immer mehr gefälschte Studien und Fake-Publikationen - auch in Fachzeitschriften. Künstliche Intelligenz macht das Fälschen leichter. "

Interview mit Bernhard Sabel (Dazu: Stockholmer Erklärung
Forschende fordern Reformen im Publikationssystem: https://www.forschung-und-lehre.de/forschung/forschende-fordern-reformen-im-publikationssystem-7378)

#FakeScience #PaperMills #ImpactFactor #PublishOrPerish #jounsls #ki #ai #3SatNano #StockholmerErklärung #StockholmDeclaration

Bringt KI die Wissenschaft in Gefahr?

Es gibt immer mehr gefälschte Studien und Fake-Publikationen - und das sogar in Fachzeitschriften. Künstliche Intelligenz macht das Fälschen immer leichter.

3sat
A pilot study investigating the relationship between journal impact factor and methodological quality of real-world observational studies – InfoDoc MicroVeille

📘 Accepted #Journal #Article Announcement

The article “#GenerativeAI and the #UrbanAI Policy Challenges Ahead: Trustworthy for Whom?” has been accepted in the journal Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy (#TGPPP, Emerald Publishing).
📊 #ImpactFactor 2.6 | #CiteScore 5.0

🔗 See the #AAM #AuthoredAcceptedManuscript) via @ssrn https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5594632

Wie kann man Forschungsleistung fairer bewerten als mit Kennzahlen a la #Impactfactor & Co.? Am @bih_charite entwickelt Miriam Kip alternative Indikatoren und implementiert sie bspw. in Lebensläufen für Berufungsverfahren. Mario Rembold sprach mit ihr: https://www.laborjournal.de/rubric/essays/essays2025/e25_06.php

Damian Pattinson of @eLife (and my former boss at PLOS ONE) at The Royal Society's Future of Scientific Publishing conference describes the devastating effect on their submissions of Clarivate removing their Impact Factor due to their change in peer review model, then asks why other journals, including Science, don't renounce their own IFs.

#SciComm #JournalPublishing #ImpactFactor #Clarivate #WebOfScience #PeerReview #TheRoyalSociety #FutureOfScientificPublishing #Citations #Bibliometrics #ResearchImpact #ResearchAssessment

@elduvelle Sure - let’s add to the problem of reproducibility (retraction rates are already much higher for high-impact journals, incl. Nature – Brembs et al 2013 "Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank." Frontiers in human Neuroscience) by adding AI peer reviewers and watch academic publishing enshittify further. #reproducibility #impactfactor #ScientificJournals

The killer quote! Prestigious institutions and prestigious journals drive irreproducibility in the life sciences - well, at least in this particular sample.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.07.07.663460v2

#reproducibility #impactfactor

JEOS-RP continues from strength to strength.

🚀2024 Impact Factor = 3.2, up 68% from 2023.

🚀2024 CiteScore up by 9.1%, to 3.6.

A testament to the hard work of the authors, peer-reviewers and publishing team. We'll be celebrating at #EOSAM2025

#ImpactFactor #CiteScore

Impact Factor and CiteScore rankings reflect growth for Acta Acustica

🚀2024 Impact Factor = 1.4, up 40% from 2023.

🚀2024 CiteScore up by 17.9%, to 3.3.

Congratulations and thanks go to all involved in making the journal a go-to resource in acoustics.

#ImpactFactor #CiteScore

If you share your journals' impact factors, use the 5 year indicator. The one year impact factors fluctuate, are sensitive to minor citation differences. The 5 year factors are more stable and say more about the journal. #ImpactFactor #CiteScore #JCI #academicchatter