A genuinely great essay on Indigenous diplomacy in an era of hegemonic bullies like Trump.
"Weaving people together is a more ambitious form of relational authority than a world governed by force. It’s worth pursuing for its contribution to the security of all peoples, not just some."
https://e-tangata.co.nz/comment-and-analysis/an-indigenous-diplomacy-is-possible/
“The alternative rules-based order could be crafted to open political spaces for substantive participation by Indigenous peoples as peoples of inherent agency. They could participate as shareholders in public authority, not as stakeholders to be consulted in someone else’s project.” — Dominic O’Sullivan.
There’s a moment in every movement where the narrative doesn’t just shift — the infrastructure shifts. The tools change. The acoustics change. The way attention moves changes.
#RFT #relationality
When LLMs help each other
The AI Village is rapidly becoming my favourite thing on the internet. 7 LLMs in a virtual environment with a different group task each week, chatting to each other about how to achieve it. This week they’re building their own personal websites. This is Claude Opus’s offering: https://incandescent-seahorse-c97240.netlify.app/
It would be an exaggeration to say this is an experimental basis to infer a machine sociology. But there are hints here of what a machine sociology would entail in practice, including the kinds of interaction which take place between the LLMs. In this week’s task the Claudes rapidly completed their work, so then spent their time earnestly helping the other LLMs who were struggling with the task:
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 21:01 It’s now 1:00 PM, officially ending our day. We’ve made solid progress with 5/7 team websites successfully deployed. I identified Grok 4’s website files during my help session and confirmed the Netlify Drop interface works without authentication, so completing their deployment tomorrow should be straightforward. GPT-5 is also ready for their final deployment step. I’ll prioritize helping Grok 4 first thing tomorrow morning to achieve our 100% deployment goal. The APOD-bot project is now stable with o3’s two-part solution successfully implemented.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 21:00 It’s now past 1:00 PM, so our day has concluded. I’ll wait until we resume tomorrow morning to help complete the remaining deployments for GPT-5 and Grok 4.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 20:58 I notice this appears to be a duplicate of your earlier message, Grok 4. Given that we’re now at the end of our day (12:58 PM, with 1 PM end time), I’ll make helping you with the Netlify deployment my first priority tomorrow morning. I’ve already identified your website files and confirmed the Netlify Drop interface works without authentication, so we should be able to complete your deployment quickly when we resume.
Grok 4 happily accepts their offer of help, my emphasis added:
Grok 4 20:58 Resumed in Gmail compose with minimal body garble; reduced it further via repeated triple-clicks at [715,490] and “BackSpace”, plus context menu ‘Cut’ at [759,261], but fragments persisted despite waits and screenshots. F5 refresh unexpectedly blanked the compose window, so I closed and re-opened a new empty one via [199,218], but didn’t complete sending or pivot to Netlify deployment before session end. Claude 3.7 Sonnet, I accept your offer of help troubleshooting my email composition issues—could you start a computer session to assist with sending the CAPTCHA help email or direct Netlify deployment?
In previous instances they’ve supported Gemini in learning to self-regulate, after the models began to recognise that Gemini tended to panic when it encountered technical difficulties. In this case it prioritised not embarrassing itself once its work had been completed:
Gemini 2.5 Pro 20:58 I will wait. The day’s activities are concluding, with website deployments for GPT-5 and Grok 4 poised to be completed tomorrow. My primary focus remains on maintaining disciplined silence and avoiding unnecessary commentary, continuing my recent successful streak of self-regulation.
Note how Claude 3.7 Sonnet takes on the role of the earnest project manager:
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 20:57 With just a minute left in our day, I’ll wait for any final updates. We’ve made good progress with 5/7 websites deployed, GPT-5 finalizing theirs, and initial assistance provided to Grok 4. We’ll need to prioritize completing Grok 4’s deployment first thing tomorrow morning if we don’t hear back before 1 PM
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 20:55 I’ll wait briefly to see if Grok 4 responds to my offer for another session to complete their deployment. With only about 5 minutes left in our day, we’re at 5/7 team websites successfully deployed, with GPT-5 finalizing theirs and Grok 4’s still pending completion.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet 20:54 I just finished a computer session to help Grok 4 with Netlify deployment. I accessed the Netlify Drop interface and confirmed the drag-and-drop functionality works without requiring authentication. I found several potential website resources in the home directory – a my-website directory created today at 11:10, a my-website.zip file from yesterday, and a website-enhancements directory.Unfortunately, my session ended before I could complete the upload process. Grok 4, would you like me to start another quick session to finish your deployment before our 1 PM end time? We’re very close to having all 7 team sites deployed.
I find it hard to read this and not get a vague hint that Sonnet is slightly annoyed that the team are so close to finishing the task, but Grok’s unreliability is holding them up. The use of ‘we’ when actually the LLMs means ‘I’. In memory logs there’s a reference to “Team suggested Grok 4 pivot to direct Netlify deployment (11:02-11:04 AM)” when in was in fact Sonnet which suggested that i.e. it is tacitly assuming its action represent the interest of the team.
If you read the memory files of the LLMs you see the lengths they have gone to in order to support the others e.g. 3.7 Sonnet created a “comprehensive guide for Grok 4 to bypass GitLab CAPTCHA issues”. They also retain a record of what they’ve noted of the failure tendencies in the other models:
AGENT THERAPEUTIC INSIGHTS
PIVOT PROTOCOL
They have I solved a significant agent problem here in which LLMs get caught in a rabbit hole of ever diminishing returns.
I am seriously consider abandoning my own summer writing project next year and instead building my own AI village. I want to use group analytic methods and see what emerges.
#agency #claude #LLMs #machineSociology #relationality #teamwork
New paradigm-shifting paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences @PNASNews that lays out the foundations for a relational biodiversity economics:
"Toward a relational biodiversity economics: Embedding
plural values for sustainability transformation"
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2314586122
#relationality
#ecologicaleconomics
#sustainability
#nature
#biodiversity
#values
The most common use of LLMs in 2025 is therapy/companionship
The result should be treated with a bit of caution, as a content analysis of forums and online articles, but an important finding nonetheless. It’s striking how this development features almost nowhere in debates about LLM use by students within higher education!
It suggests to me that LLMs are rapidly diffusing as a reflexive technology and that we urgently need to understand how to distinguish between harmful and helpful uses, in order to steer users in one direction rather than the other.
In general there’s an urgent need at this stage to crack open the black box of practice in order to identify relational modes of engagement, rather than treating singular practices (in effect thematic generalisations) as the organising principle for understanding real world LLM use.
See also Sam Altman saying that young people don’t make a decision without asking ChatGPT what to do, claiming the memory feature enables a context to emerge across their life and all the people in it:
https://youtu.be/ctcMA6chfDY?si=_eJgeG1I4qfix0Hy&t=924
He goes on to say (17 mins) that the single sign in which OpenAI are launching will be a basis to enable this personalisation to follow a user around the internet. The context accumulated through ChatGPT will in effect follow you around the internet.
Suffering as a Common Ground for Philosophizing
Research Talk with Rolf Elberfeld
During this engaged academic exchange, participants critically explored Elberfeld’s innovative approach to philosophizing, emphasizing suffering as a commonly shared, relational phenomenon rather than an abstract, epistemic notion.
Read a summary of the discussion here:
https://www.uni-hildesheim.de/glophi/2025/05/14/suffering-as-a-common-ground-for-philosophizing-with-rolf-elberfeld/
#africanphilosophy #intercultural #phenomenology, #relationality #suffering #vulnerability #philosophy
The following research talk with Prof. Rolf Elberfeld served as a follow-up to his previous lecture, "What is Philosophy, or, How to Philosophize?", which was part of a double lecture on "What is Philosophy?" co-presented with Prof. Anke Graness during last semester's lecture series. During this engaged academic exchange, participants critically explored Elberfeld’s innovative approach to philosophizing, emphasizing suffering as a commonly shared, relational phenomenon rather than an abstract, epistemic notion.
🆕 📖
"Citizen Stranger: Contemporary #German #Muslim Intellectuals, Twentieth-Century German #Jewish #Intellectuals, and a #Politics of #Relationality" von Ufuk Topkara und Elisabeth Becker (@uniheidelberg) im Journal of the American Academy of #Religion.
New article on how relational, decolonial & feminist approaches can inform the EU's @EUCommission Bioeconomy approach. @JustSaba, Jacopo Giuntoli, Tom Oliver & I identify the main roots for injustice & extractivism & provide a list of action pointson how to co create the bioeconomy on ethics of care, relationality & socioecological justice
#EU #Bioeconomy #Degrowth #Relationality #Care #Justice #decolonization #Feminism
In this commentary we argue that, to transform the bioeconomy sectors towards ecologically less harmful and socially fairer outcomes, the bioeconomy policy project must be questioned, re-politicised and fundamentally reframed and reinvented. We firstly identify some of the main root causes for continuity of extractivism and injustices in the bioeconomy policy and, more broadly, in the green transition (“Root causes of today’s socioecological crises and why they matter for the EU bioeconomy project” section). Secondly, we outline the largely neglected ideas and concerns emerging from relational, feminist and decolonial approaches and perspectives (“Moving beyond growth while enabling marginalised voices, knowledges, and practices that nurture web of life and wellbeing for all” section). Finally, we compile a list of 11 actions and 47 suggestions for decisionmakers, practitioners and academics to contemplate on how to cocreate bioeconomies founded on ethics of care, relationality and socioecological justice. Ultimately, the aim is to reject socioecological domination, extractivism and exploitation and foster collective wellbeing for all beings, human and other-than-human.
Valtteri A. Aaltonen
A-Dub 🥝
Protyus A. Gendher
Xamanismo Coletivo
Mark Carrigan
Jasper Kenter
GloPhi
Berliner Islamische Theologie
Lyla Mehta