Курс - NO 23°

Самое интересное будет, когда ЦБ _не сможет_ ответить ответить ужесточением ДКП на высокую инфляцию. А пока ему (ЦБ) удается наглядно (именно наглядно!) демонстрировать таргетирование инфляции - некоторый контроль* над инфляцией сохраняется.

"Набиуллина: «Уровень жесткости нашей политики будет определяться задачей возвращения инфляции к цели»".

#Россия
#таргетирование_инфляции

#монетаризм

#NO23°

https://www.bfm.ru/news/560710

Набиуллина: «Уровень жесткости нашей политики будет определяться задачей возвращения инфляции к цели»

Как заявила глава ЦБ, рост цен в этом году будет вдвое выше цели. На конференции по итогам заседания Банка России она рассказала о причинах разгона инфляции

BFM.ru

I was proud to be out at pre-poll yesterday to help debunk the many lies of the No campaign.
Lies I heard from No campaigners yesterday:

- Once 'The Voice' is in the constitution it's permanent, it cannot be be take out...FALSE!
Sections can and have been removed from the constitution in the past. In 1967 section 127 was removed along with discriminatory words from section 51.

- That 'The Voice' is racist...WRONG!
Having an Indigenous voice is a mechanism for inclusion and fairness. Fighting for non-Indigenous people to make decisions about Indigenous people is white supremacy/nationalism.

- That there is no need for an Indigenous Voice and we should have just one voice...FRIGHTENINGLY MISGUIDED!
Advisory Committees are established to make improvements to specific sectors; it is why we continue to have climate advisory committees, arts advisory committees, disability advisory committees and more. Should they all be dissolved too so that there is just "one voice"?

One of the two big sales pitches the 'No' side had yesterday, was that the Voice is 'divisive'. How can voting for inclusion be divisive? This should not be a partisan issue, it is Peter Dutton who has made this referendum divisive. This referendum is about voting for inclusion and an opportunity to be heard. How is that divisive?
The second sales pitch is 'if you don't know, vote no'. They are treating YOU like idiots! Are you an idiot? I think not!
If you don't know, find out! There is plenty of information out there for anyone who wishes to search for it. And I am not talking about information from the Yes or No side either. There is plenty of independent information, scholarly articles and history books that will help you understand this particular referendum. Educate yourself, don't let the No campaign gaslight you...I believe you ARE smarter than that!

#yes #yes23 #yes23au #referendum #no23 #auspol #blaklivesmatter #indigenous #yes2023

I asked Google Bard if it was up for a debate on The Voice. It expressed an opinion, unlike ChatGPT.

http://fairding.com/2023/09/24/computer-says-yes/

#referendum2023 #voicetoparliament #thevoice #yes23 #no23 #yes2023 #no2023

Computer Says Yes

Prompt for Google Bard: Have you gathered enough information about the upcoming Australian referendum to have a reasoned argument about it? Google Bard, verbatim: Yes, I have gathered enough inform…

BONWAG

@newstik

„Ist 42 Deine Lieblingszahl?“

„#NÖ23“

#scnr

War es ein "Fehler" der #ÖVP, die Zweitwohnsitzer in #NÖ nicht mehr #wählen zu lassen? Hätten die eher ÖVP gewählt? #NÖ23