1/

The next few posts are going to explore how to arrange limit sets in time to make movies that appeal to human eyes. So far the animations on this channel have varied granularity ε or the μ parameter that defines the topology of the limit set.

This movie, and the ones following in this thread, consists simply of concatenations of double cusp limit sets, so there is no continuous movement to model.

However, to our visual systems there is a "preferred" way to sequence double-cusp groups that is appealing, and conserved across projections.

The art tax for this post is a simple example of a pleasing path: a looped animation of the Jorgensen tb=2 projection for the cusps 1/n, where n is { 63, 62, 61 ... 4, 3, 2, 3, 4, ... 63 }.

The palette and the rules for choosing line colors (by the depth of the terminal node in the tree associated with those line segments) do not change at all from frame to frame. In this case the palette size was 60.

The apparent color-cycling behavior comes about because the shapes that our minds map as "the same" from one frame to the next have a consistently increasing tree depth associated with them.

To look at this a little more closely, see the attached still image, which shows how the structure of the limit set changes as n varies. Each step along the path is the transformation of the previous circle by a group generator. For the 1/n cusp, for walking this path, we apply the loxodromic/spiral generator a (or A) n times, before applying the parabolic generator B (or b).

#kleinianlimitset #kleiniangroup #fractals #mobius #mobiustransforms #mathematicalart #mathart #mastoart #perfectloops

This is the fifth and final post in a series arising from the Fibonacci cusps of Kleinian double-cusp groups.

The art for this post is an ε-descent movie of the Golden Mean Group's Jorgensen projection. Unlike the other ε-descent movies, this one goes deep into the subpixel range, from 2px down to 0.01px (that is, 200x finer required granularity than the other ones). And it's clear that it's far from done revealing visible features.

Notice how you can still follow the downward paths as they trace out the Fibonacci sequence with their hairpin turns: 1-1-2-3-5 etc, but this time there isn't a final value where they will flatten out and join one another

The entire 150-frame movie took about 10 days to render; the initial frames took about 8 seconds apiece when ε~2. The final three frames, at ε~{1.012, 1.011, 1.01} took {24h, 28h30m, 36h) to render : over 35% of the total rendering time!

This is an example of malicious compliance by a mathematical object: it is associated with a point on the Maskit Curve, so its features do have to shrink as you descend the tree. And in the limit it will converge on being constructed entirely out of completed tangent circles, and those emergent circles will close, but it's going to take literally as long as possible to get there.

There are infinitely many other such irrational groups along the Maskit Curve which I, following the example of Pythagoras, will proceed to disregard in favor of the far-more-tractable rationals.

End of thread.

Traversal in R, rendering using Cairo, movie conversion with ffmpeg.

#kleinianlimitset #kleiniangroup #fractals #mobius #mobiustransforms #mathematicalart #mathart #fibonacci #mastoart

#fibonaccicusps

This is the fourth in a series of posts arising from the Fibonacci cusps of Kleinian double-cusp groups.

The last post asked "why does the Golden Mean group clearly have more visible features to reveal when rendered at ε=1/40px, while the Fibonacci cusps that converge to it are done showing new visible features when ε gets down to about 2 pixels?" (see https://mathstodon.xyz/@KleinianArborist/110685414981687380)

The attached video shows an analogy for the difference between "rational" vs "irrational" numbers on the Maskit curve (longer version: https://youtu.be/9FvB8WWlYPY).

It shows side-by-side renders of the first few Fibonacci cusps (Unit Circle projection) as their required granularity decreases (the bar in the middle visually displays the value of ε).

On the right the "emergent circles" close immediately, whereas on the left they never quite meet. Circles happen when an infinite word in the group has the property of "parabolicity".

All the parabolic words for double-cusp groups are predictable and repeating (by analogy, rational numbers always repeat their digits). The groups corresponding to irrational numbers also have an infinite number of parabolic words, but they're not predictable.

The image on the right has these "special words" included in the ordered list of points for each node, the left does not. Those special words make the emergent circles.

#kleinianlimitset #kleiniangroup #fractals #mobius #mobiustransforms
#mathematicalart #generative #generativeart #mathart #fibonacci
#fibonaccicusps

This is the third in a series of posts arising from the Fibonacci cusps of Kleinian double-cusp groups.

As previously discussed, a series of fractions Fib(n)/Fib(n+1) will tend towards 1/ϕ over time. Correspondingly, the sequence of Fibonacci cusps on the Maskit curve will converge to the point corresponding to 1/ϕ, which generates what I suppose might be called the Golden Mean Group.

The μ parameter for this group for the Maskit slice where the second and fourth generators are parabolic ("tb=2") is provided in [Indra], specifically μ=1.2943265032+1.6168866453i (there is a mirror group with essentially the same properties at μ=0.7056734968+1.6168866453i). Curt McMullen and Troels Jorgensen were major proximate contributors to nailing this down.

Attached are Maskit and Jorgensen renders of the Golden Mean group. Interestingly, this set doesn't meet up like the Fib cusps that led up to it, even though the value of ε was set extremely low. It looks like one of the intermediate frames from the walk animations, not a proper group. But what's there still seems to be made up of tangent circles. What's going on? We'll start to explore that in the next post.

A completely different take on rendering this group is found in [Indra], fig 10.4 which is definitely worth a look if you're interested.

#kleinianlimitset #kleiniangroup #fractals #mobius #mobiustransforms #mathematicalart #generative #generativeart #mathart #fibonacci #fibonaccicusps

This is the second in a series of posts arising from the Fibonacci cusps of Kleinian double-cusp groups.

One of the more endearing properties of the double-cusp groups is that they don't hold anything back; once you know how, you can read which group they are right off the image.

Remember how last post we were imagining jumping further and further down to the next Fibonacci cusp (1/1, 1/2, 2/3,3/5...), switching directions each time? Well, let's take a look and see what the groups themselves are telling us.

The attached image contains a selection from the Jorgensen projection of the 13/21 cusp, with a couple of paths marked through the set. If you compare to the animations in the previous post, you'll recognize the downward-tracing path as the one that's "always there". while the upward-tracing path is the one that "emerges" as you land exactly on the double-cusp point.

Note that the fractal repeats itself horizontally, so you can use the extra copy of each path in the image to follow the trace; for the later parts of the path, refer to the detail images on the right.

Pretty slick that our mental model of jumping left and right from cusp to cusp along higher and higher fibonacci counts has resulted in an image that does the same thing! Almost as though that metaphor was chosen for just that reason...

#kleinianlimitset #kleiniangroup #fractals #mobius #mobiustransforms #mathematicalart #generative #generativeart #mathart #fibonacci #fibonaccicusps