Thinking aloud on a work in progress:
John Dewey needs to be rescued from both his fans and his foes.
If one thinks of philosophy as not separated by unbridgeable gaps from either the natural sciences nor the study of society and its needs, then one is an heir to Dewey.
Paradoxically, his writings constitute not just a source but an obstacle for the best understanding of his thought.
He wrote too much; his collected works fill 76 volumes. Navigating such a plenitude of writings is a challenge in itself. Worse, navigating his notoriously turgid prose makes reading Dewey less like a voyage of discovery than a punishment march. The contrast with the stylish wit of fellow pragmatist William James or the rigorous elegance of his contemporary Bertrand Russell is painful.
Still, engage with Dewey one must if one is to understand both the problems, possibilities, and legacy of US progressive thought in the first half of the 20th century.
More to follow on this topic over the coming months.
Image: John Dewey -- Деветьяров Руслан -- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ -- Wikimedia Commons
#JohnDewey #USHistory #Philosophy #IntellectualHistory #Progressivism #Pragmatism


