Democratic leaders were outspoken during the massive US military buildup in the Middle East,
âïždecrying his unwillingness to engage with Congress and lack of long-term strategy for Iran.
đžThey noted that it was Trump, during his first term, who shredded Barack Obamaâs nuclear agreement with Iran.
Once the US and Israeli military struck on Saturday, the sharpest voices accused the president of riding roughshod over the constitution.
Senator Bernie #Sanders denounced the assault as âan illegal, premeditated and unconstitutional warâ,
while Senator Chris #Van #Hollen warned it amounted to a âregime-change warâ that would leave the US less secure.
Senator Tim #Kaine, long a thorn in the side of presidents of both parties on war powers, called the strikes âa colossal mistakeâ
and demanded a swift vote requiring Trump to seek authorisation.
Others, however, were more qualified. Tom #Suozzi, a New York Democrat who co-chairs the Problem Solvers caucus, wrote on X: âI agree with the Presidentâs objectives that Iran can never be allowed to obtain nuclear capabilities.â
Henry #Cuellar of Texas said the threat posed by Iran was âreal and longstandingâ.
And not all Democrats are lining up behind a war powers rebuke.
There may be enough defections to block a war powers resolution,
-- although a few libertarian Republicans could join those in favor.
The split also exposes a deeper unease within Democratic ranks over how robustly to confront Iran and how far to go in backing Israeli military action.
There are also political traps as Republicans accuse them of lacking patriotism and ignoring the Iranian diaspora who have taken to the streets to celebrate Khameneiâs downfall.
The discomfort is embodied by Senator Mark #Kelly, a former combat pilot and potential 2028 presidential contender. Appearing on NBCâs Meet the Press, Kelly was asked if he agrees with Lindsey Graham, a hawkish Republican senator, that the world is now safer because the supreme leader of Iran is dead.
Kelly replied: âWell, I agree with that part. I mean, itâs a good thing that the supreme leader is gone and some of the folks around him.â
đBut he also delivered a withering assessment of the White Houseâs preparation.
âŠïž âHope is not a strategy,â Kelly warned,
questioning whether the administration had any serious plan for the aftermath.
Air power can destroy targets, he added,
âĄïžbut fully eliminating capabilities without boots on the ground is âincredibly challengingâ.
The congressional debate over war powers would mostly be symbolic.
đEven if a resolution were to pass the narrowly split Congress, Trump likely would veto it and Congress would not have the two-thirds majority needed to overturn that rejection.
Congress has often failed to block other US military actions, including in a Senate vote on Venezuela,
đbut the roll calls stand as a public record.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/02/democrats-divided-iran-trump?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other