🦈 Do different labs get the same #eDNA results? #eWHALE (#BiodivProtect) found differences in detection success, with sharks less often detected. This highlights the need for standardized protocols for reliable biodiversity assessments.
https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.9.128235
Inter-laboratory ring test for environmental DNA extraction protocols: implications for marine megafauna detection using three novel qPCR assays

The comparability of methods applied to environmental DNA (eDNA) samples across laboratories remains a significant challenge for biodiversity monitoring on a global scale. Performance differences between protocols can jeopardize effective conservation strategies across regions and focal species. To address potential discrepancies amongst four international partners within a collaborative eDNA initiative, an inter-laboratory comparison (i.e., ring test) was conducted to compare efficiencies of established DNA extraction methodologies based on 39 eDNA samples. Each laboratory contributed eight to eleven samples collected throughout the North-East Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea near sperm whales, porbeagle sharks, basking sharks, bottlenose dolphins and common dolphins. After lysis, aliquots were exchanged between laboratories before subsequent DNA extraction using each facility’s preferred method. Extracts were returned to the lysates’ respective laboratories of origin for measurements of total DNA concentration, as well as quantitative PCR using three novel species-specific assays for marine megafauna. Our findings revealed similar concentrations of total DNA, yet a significant reduction in extraction performance for targeted qPCR reactions by one laboratory, who has therefore modified their extraction method to be used for the remainder of this project. Overall, detection success differed based on the target taxa with sharks being less often detected (and at lower concentrations) than marine mammals. Significant interaction effects were found between combinations of laboratories and species, suggesting a link between extraction protocols and variable environmental conditions. Our study serves as a foundational step towards establishing reproducible practices that are crucial for the success of multinational eDNA projects to enable comparable results.

Metabarcoding and Metagenomics

🎙️ #Podcast-Tipp: @Bettina_Thal vom Institut für Zoologie ist auf Radio FM4 im Planet Strange Podcast zu Gast. Das Thema lautet: "Retten uns die Wale?" 🐋🌊

Unter anderem geht es um Walforschung an der Universität Innsbruck und das große EU-Projekt #eWHALE.

📅 HEUTE: 26. Februar, ab 19:00 auf Radio #FM4 und überall, wo es Podcasts gibt: https://fm4.orf.at/stories/3039441/

📸: CW Azores
#okologie #eDNA

Drei Tage am Meer - Ein FM4 Deep Dive - fm4.ORF.at

Ewiger Sehnsuchtsort, Schauplatz der Klimakrise oder eine gefährliche Fluchtroute? FM4 erkundet in einer dreiteiligen Reportagereihe die verschiedenen Facetten des Meers.

fm4.ORF.at

🚨 🐳 We are hiring! 🐳 🚨 Fully funded 3-year #PhD position in the #eWHALE project at the @uniinnsbruck #Austria

Check out the full job ad here: https://ewhale.eu/opportunities/phdad_uibk/
#PhDposition #eDNA #ecoevo #CitizenScience #BiodiversaPlus @Bettina_Thal #PhDstudent

PhD position at the University of Innsbruck – eWHALE

#Introduction Hi Mastodon! 🐳This is the official account of the #BiodiversaPlus project #eWHALE. Our aim is to connect marine #conservation efforts, #eDNA, #WhaleWatching and #CitizenScience. Come and join us on this journey. https://ewhale.eu
eWHALE – Combining environmental DNA sampling, whale watching and citizen science for stakeholder-driven marine biodiversity protection in the North-East Atlantic and the Mediterranean. A Biodiversa+ project