Journal of Alpine ResearchFeb 4, 2025

Published as "varia" article (2025):
"The Relationality of #CollectiveProperty. #Commons and Convivial Conservation in #Umbria, Italy"

> The analysis of the case studies, that are the Umbrian #ComunanzeAgrarie of #MassaMartana and #Colpetrazzo, confirms the positive relationality of #CollectiveProperty, counterposed to the socialisation of people and spaces linked to the territorialisation of individual #PrivateProperty, as it allows the maintenance of #CommonGoods and spaces which guarantee a direct and democratic territorial governance able to contrast the present socio-environmental challenges.

https://journals.openedition.org/rga/13302

#mountains #ApennineMountains

The Relationality of Collective Property. Commons and Convivial Con...

Introduction In recent years, within the field of mountain geography, several authors have analysed the forms of territorial governance characterizing Italian mountain areas, highlighting the impor...

Show threadNaaru 🍞 πŸ•ΉοΈ 🌱 Mar 29, 2019

2.1.3. If there's no property owner the workers would still produce, the business would still profit and because there's no property owner the workers would get the full value of what they produced. And instead of the property owner making all the decisions about the business, the workers would instead. This kind of business is known as a cooperative, where the workers have completely democratic control of the workplace.

#socialism #socialism101 #cooperative #collectiveproperty

Show threadPaul Free (14 β’Ά, europe)Jun 30, 2017

@douginamug
I don't like to use #collectiveProperty or #groupProperty for #commons.
As #commoning is a way of dealing with resources free of the idea of property.
That's why some call things #commons to describe the way relations are formed around an resource.

It's about care taking and supporting. It's owned by no one.