@mongabay Thanks for this thorough report! Anyone claiming to be #carbonneutral is relying on #carbonoffsetting, that is the very definition of the term, which should be banned entirely, given it assumes somehow #carbonremoval is a real thing. As for the principle of #additionality (or for that matter, complete lack of in in 99% of the schemes), John Oliver is my go-to. Simple, fast, #factchecked & hilarious skit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p8zAbFKpW0

@JohanEmpa if you advocate for #carbonremoval, please advocate for #additionality and understand #mitigation deterrence. Please also keep yourself actively informed with voices that are critical of #carbon removal. Here is an accessible sketch by British comedian #johnoliver that should make clear what some of the main problems are. That should give you tools to dive into the data. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6p8zAbFKpW0

@JohanEmpa I know you are a keen advocate of #carbonremoval, but I beg you walk the fine line between doing your best with what is available (aka #greenserver, #treeplanting) and promoting the belief that buying #greencredits or paying into #carbonoffsets will actually REMOVE carbon from the atmosphere. It wont'. #Additionality is barely alive, in fact I'd argue it's long dead. #reduceemissions first, aka #stopflying.