二月の茶会 🍵
もう三月ですが 大寒から立春へ
一年で最も寒い 二月の茶会では
筒茶碗と呼ばれ 縁の高い茶碗で
冷めないように 振る舞われます
正客には 赤楽の筒茶碗
次客には 旬の紅梅茶碗
二月の茶会 🍵
もう三月ですが 大寒から立春へ
一年で最も寒い 二月の茶会では
筒茶碗と呼ばれ 縁の高い茶碗で
冷めないように 振る舞われます
正客には 赤楽の筒茶碗
次客には 旬の紅梅茶碗
So we have { 1, 2 } ∈ Fin₁ ⊆ Fin₁ₐ ⊆ Fin₂ ⊆ Fin₃ ⊆ Fin₄ ⊆ Fin₅ ⊆ Fin₆ ⊆ Fin₇
If a set is in Fin₁ then it is considered finite by all the other definitions.
But since the axiom of choice is equivalent to saying every set can be well-ordered, if we accept it VII-finite sets are equinumerous with a finite ordinal and so Fin₇ ⊆ Fin₁ and so the differences between these definitions collapse and ZF becomes ZFC, which is a widely accepted basis for Set Theory.
My consultation with math resources was inspired by a blog post:
https://www.infinitelymore.xyz/p/what-is-the-infinite
#Metamath #ZFC #SetTheory #AxiomOfChoice #FiniteSet #Infinity