T.A.E.’s Book Review – The Elements of Style by William Strunk Jr.

William Strunk Jr.’s The Elements of Style is less a handbook than a manifesto: a compact philosophy of writing that treats prose not as ornament but as conduct. Its famous imperatives—“Omit needless words,” “Make every word tell,” “Use definite, specific, concrete language”—distill a moral as much as an aesthetic principle. For Strunk, style is not self-expression run wild; it is disciplined attention, an act of respect for both language and reader. The book’s enduring power lies in the severity of its conviction. It assumes that clarity is not the enemy of artistry but its condition.

What makes the book remarkable is the force packed into its brevity. Strunk writes in a tone of brisk authority, almost classical in its confidence, and that tone itself performs the lesson. The prose never strays into theatricality because it is constantly demonstrating restraint. In this sense, the work is self-validating: its method and its message are identical. The book does not merely advise economy; it enacts it. That unity gives it the austere elegance of a well-built tool, one whose design reveals the intelligence of its maker.

Yet The Elements of Style is more than a mechanical checklist. Beneath the rules lies a distinctly human vision of writing as an ethical encounter. To write clearly is to think clearly, and to think clearly is to refuse evasions. The book’s insistence on precision exposes the tendency of prose to blur, inflate, and conceal. Its famous commands are thus not merely stylistic preferences but acts of intellectual discipline. Even the sternness has purpose: it tries to save writers from vanity, slackness, and the dead weight of abstraction.

At the same time, the book’s severity can feel limiting if read as a complete theory of literature. It values lucidity so highly that one occasionally senses a suspicion of exuberance, ambiguity, or risk. But that is also why the book remains so useful: it does not ask to replace imagination, only to clear a path for it. One might say it teaches the writer to remove the fog so the landscape can be seen. Its famous advice is not that language should be thin, but that it should be exact enough to bear weight.

The result is a work whose modest size belies its cultural influence. Few books about writing have been so widely quoted because few have spoken so memorably in so little space. Its aphorisms have entered common speech precisely because they are so satisfying to say and so difficult to ignore. The book’s strength is that it feels timeless without ever pretending to be exhaustive. It is a classic of compression: a small volume that has shaped generations of writers by reminding them that style begins with discipline, attention, and humility.

In the end, The Elements of Style is not merely about how to write; it is about how to honour language. Its deepest lesson is that style is not decoration added after thought, but thought made visible. For that reason, it remains indispensable—not because it contains every answer, but because it teaches the writer to ask better questions of every sentence.

#BookReviews #grammar #LiteraryCriticism #Strunk #WilliamStrunkJr #writing

Omit needless words. Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts.
-- William Strunk Jr.

#Wisdom #Quotes #WilliamStrunkJr #Writing

#Photography #Panorama #Morning #Mists #Fogbow #LakeSantaFe #Florida

Omit needless words. Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts.
-- William Strunk Jr.

#Wisdom #Quotes #WilliamStrunkJr #Writing

#Photography #Panorama #Panopainting #Flowers #Junkyard #Minnesota

Omit needless words. Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts.
-- William Strunk Jr.

#Wisdom #Quotes #WilliamStrunkJr #Writing

#Photography #Panorama #Canyon #SlickRock #IcebergCanyon #LakePowell #Utah

The Strunk cost fallacy

Myths have serious sticking power. This is true not just of the myths of antiquity but also of more modern and niche types, like the myths of English usage. It seems that nothing will ever stop people peeving pointlessly about split infinitives, double negatives, passive voice, singular they, &c.

One thing that makes usage myths sticky, and spready, is that when we’ve gone to the trouble of learning something, we’re often reluctant to unlearn it, even in the face of contradictory truth – especially when that knowledge gives us a pleasurable feeling of authority or expertise. Renouncing it means accepting that we’ve wasted our time, so instead we double down.

This makes it a form of sunk cost fallacy or sunk cost effect. The term is from economics but has spread to more general use. I’m about to spread it further, with a goofy twist: Doubling down on a bogus rule of language use because you’ve invested time or cognitive effort into learning it is hereby known as the Strunk cost fallacy (or Strunk cost effect).

Regrettably, there is no way to include E. B. White in the coinage without spoiling the pun, but both he and William Strunk Jr. bear some responsibility for promulgating a range of egregious misunderstandings about English grammar, usage, and ‘correctness’.

The dogmatic tone in those authors’ influential Elements of Style also fuels, among some of its devotees, intolerance of non-standardized dialects and informal varieties of English, because readers gain (or strengthen) the impression that in language use there can be only one right way. This is another fallacy, an insidious and socially toxic one.

If you find evidence that you have a mistaken belief about language use – it happens to us all – then my advice is to heed that evidence. Instead of allowing your defences to reject the possibility that you’ve wasted your time learning and maybe promoting a falsity, embrace the opportunity to revise your beliefs. Don’t fall for the Strunk cost fallacy.

In closing, here’s a related piece of snark:

Accidentally typed “Strunk and Why” and this sums up my feelings better than any tired rant I might muster

— Stan Carey (@stancarey.bsky.social) Oct 16, 2024 at 20:33

(I tried embedding an equivalent Mastodon post, but it didn’t work the way Bluesky’s did. I’m using both platforms for now.)

* * *

A few other coinages you might like: Whom’s Law of Hypercorrection; Indo-European Jones; scary quotes; the apostrophantom; the Typographic Oath for editors.

#books #EBWhite #grammar #humour #language #neologisms #peevology #phrases #prescriptivism #TheElementsOfStyle #usage #WilliamStrunkJr

A to Z of English usage myths

English usage lore is full of myths and hobgoblins. Some have the status of zombie rules, heeded by millions despite being bogus and illegitimate since forever (split infinitives, preposition-stran…

Sentence first

Omit needless words. Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts.
-- William Strunk Jr.

#Wisdom #Quotes #WilliamStrunkJr #Writing

#Photography #Panorama #MississippiRiver #PikesPeak #Iowa