https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/comment/topic/2026/03/27/the-world-turned-upside-down

BY:
Paul Bongiorno is a columnist for The Saturday Paper and a 35-year veteran of the Canberra Press Gallery:

The entire planet is paying a very high price for the abandonment of a world order that once constrained the powerful from actions that weaker nations would struggle to survive.

The fuel crisis foisted on us by the Iran war is a dramatic case in point. The visiting head of the International Energy Agency, Fatih Birol, says the scale of the economic carnage caused by the war is worse than the combined impacts of the three biggest energy shocks in modern history.

Birol had in mind the oil shocks of 1973 and 1979, which led to rationing and petrol queues. He also cited the 2022 gas crunch, which came in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Birol said he was worried households around the world were not better informed about the magnitude of the challenge we are facing. The federal opposition lays that very charge at the feet of the Albanese government. Hindsight is a wonderful gift for parties not in government.

In the first instance, Anthony Albanese’s job as prime minister is to avoid panicking the populace, especially as the facts, as Energy Minister Chris Bowen correctly outlined, did not warrant immediate draconian action.

That was particularly so when United States President Donald Trump was assuring the world that his military intervention would be swift and short-lived.

One cabinet minister observed Australians simply do not trust Trump and this “hugely” contributed to the undermining of Bowen’s message that there was no need to panic buy.

Trump’s inability to keep open the critical Strait of Hormuz, the gateway for about 20 per cent of the globe’s oil and gas, and Iran’s retaliation against its neighbouring energy-rich Gulf states, sent the price of petrol, diesel and gas soaring.

Australia’s abundance of natural gas spared it this trifecta, but the disruption of our energy market was complete, with Bowen having the embarrassing task of informing parliament every day about the growing number of service stations that had run out of fuel. This is a problem more of distribution than supply, but a problem all the same.

The opposition kept up its pursuit of the government’s handling of the mounting crisis. They say it is inadequate if not complacent. This drew charges from Bowen and other ministers that the Liberal leadership had chosen “partisanship over patriotism, and they should hang their heads in shame”.

Bowen, however, began taking measures that ordinarily would be considered to border on the extreme. He lowered the fuel standards for diesel and petrol so that “dirtier” petrol from the Brisbane Ampol refinery normally destined for export can now legally be sold in Australia. The purpose was to boost supply in an attempt to restrain price rises.

This did not stop petrol prices reaching a record average high of $2.38 a litre on Monday. According to the Australian Institute of Petroleum (AIP), this tops the previous record average of $2.19 set the previous week.

Albanese sought assurances from his counterpart in Singapore that this major supplier of refined product to Australia will not leave us in the lurch. Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong is full of good intentions in this regard, particularly in light of Australia’s reliability as a supplier of liquefied natural gas.

AIP chief executive Malcolm Roberts says if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed for the next couple of weeks, however, refineries in Asia that supply about 80 per cent of Australia’s refined product will struggle to meet orders. Roberts fears our imported supplies could fall off a cliff by the end of April.

Bowen was more upbeat, telling parliament that the six cancelled ships he spoke of earlier had now been “filled with new alternative orders” from different locations, following interactions with foreign counterparts. Besides replacing those, the industry has informed him it has secured at least three more cargoes for April and May.

The president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, notes the world we live in feels “upside down”. She says it is brutal, harsh and unforgiving, with old economic models of stability and safety facing a new reality.

In a speech to the Australian parliament, made as Australia finalised a free trade deal with the European Union, von der Leyen echoed sentiments Prime Minister Albanese expressed in a keynote address to the Minerals Council on Monday night.

Albanese pointed to the physical destruction of oil and gas infrastructure across the Middle East. He said that even if the conflict ended tomorrow, “there would still be a long economic tail to reckon with”.

Hopes of an early end to the conflict were buffeted when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the war’s end would depend not on the US but on when Israel says it’s done. Trump would not be the first American president challenged by Netanyahu.

Albanese said the “stable, predictable world of ever-expanding free trade is gone and it will not be returning any time soon”.

From both von der Leyen’s and Albanese’s perspectives, Trump is a central driving force in this global disruption.

There is no doubt this week’s free trade deal, signed after eight years of stalling negotiations, was spurred by the US president’s willingness to risk trade wars by imposing tariffs in defiance of pacts Washington had made with many countries, including Australia.

Australia and the EU also part company with Trump on the science of climate change and the imperative of decarbonising economies. Von der Leyen said she was proud they had made decarbonisation “a defining pillar of our free trade agreement”.

The European Commission president said, with geopolitics at boiling point, building homegrown energy supply would be necessary to deal with price shocks. She said we are “in a race to electrify our economies” and future generations will judge us on our progress.

Albanese noted Australia’s key role in decarbonising the global economy, which will need from us “more copper, more rare earths and more iron ore”. He said that’s why the biggest economies in the world are knocking on Australia’s door. The EU is the latest partner, joining the US and Canada in bolstering critical minerals cooperation and development.

No one could be more out of sympathy with this agenda than One Nation, which is consolidating its position as a serious second or third political force, as clearly demonstrated at last weekend’s South Australian election.

The new world political order in Australia sees an end to the dominance of the old Labor–Coalition duopoly. This week the YouGov poll, in line with a number of recent polls, shows the major parties are now commanding just half of voters’ primary support. It is a long way from their accustomed 70 per cent support in years gone by.

Labor’s national secretary, Paul Erickson, had some encouraging analysis of the South Australian result when he briefed Labor members in Canberra. The popularity and ascendancy of Premier Peter Malinauskas was a factor in the size of the victory. So, too, the unity and discipline of the Labor Party in contrast to the disarray of the Liberals, with their leadership churn and public conflict between moderates and conservatives.

The Liberals’ No. 1 Senate candidate for South Australia, factional powerbroker Alex Antic, does nothing to hide his admiration for Pauline Hanson and her divisive social policy attitudes.

Anthony Albanese is no Malinauskas – indeed, the premier is a rarely talented politician – but federal Labor has manifested the sort of unity and cohesion that stands it in good stead to present as a safe option in troubled times.

Albanese is completely ascendant in the parliamentary party, although he has internal critics who worry that his instincts are poor when it comes to handling criticism. They point to his reaction to the Lakemba Mosque protest and the immediate aftermath of the Bondi massacre.

The federal Liberals are on to their second leader since the last election and so far Angus Taylor hasn’t worried Albanese. He has made a good fist of adding to the government’s discomfort on the current oil shock, but this is not exactly a hard thing to do. Incumbents always cop the blame in a cost-of-living crisis.

The latest ANZ–Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence rating is an amber light for the government. Confidence fell 7.9 per cent last week at the same time as inflation expectations reached a record high.

The survey’s finding has confidence at its lowest level since records began in 1973. Soaring fuel prices and interest rate increases are putting enormous pressure on Treasurer Jim Chalmers to come up with something in the upcoming budget.

Labor is avoiding any sort of electoral test at the upcoming Farrer byelection but is keenly watching how the Angus Taylor-led Liberals and the Nationals fare in the early May poll.

Independent Michelle Milthorpe is running again after an impressive showing against Sussan Ley at the 2025 election. Milthorpe has Climate 200 backing but says that because of her family farming background she has voted for the Nationals in the past, and for the Liberals before challenging Ley last year. Locals say Milthorpe is more in the mould of the successful Indi independent Helen Haines.

Not everyone who sees the imperative of addressing climate change is a teal or a Green. In fact, Haines’s success is as sure an indicator as any that the Nationals underestimate support in regional Australia for renewables and mitigating climate change.

In that regard, the world is not completely upside down.

#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #GreensYEAH #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies #PHONkedinthehead

The world turned upside down

The entire planet is paying a very high price for the abandonment of a world order that once constrained the powerful from actions that weaker nations would struggle to survive. The fuel crisis foisted on us by the Iran war is a dramatic case in point. The visiting head of the International Energy Agency, Fatih Birol, says the scale of the economic carnage caused by the war is worse than the combined impacts of the three biggest energy shocks in modern history.

The Saturday Paper

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9207152/ian-warden-too-much-brain-power-is-wasted-analysing-donald-trump/

BY:
Ian Warden is a Canberra Times columnist:

"Can IQ tests settle whether Trump is a moron or not?"

This unkind heading appeared above a recent article concluding that, no, Trump's moronity is too elusive for IQ tests alone to capture.

This Trump era is a time of Trump-triggered crimes and evils. But as well as all the obvious, daily life and death and human misery evils, this Trump era has also brought us an accompanying, related, galaxy of absurdities and weirdnesses.

One recurring absurdity is the way in which commentators with minds 100 times more healthy and knowledge-wealthy and wise than Trump's sick and impoverished and ignorant one are, now, so demeaningly reduced to endlessly analysing Trump's thoughts and actions. Fine minds really should have finer work than this to do. It is a kind of cruel shame, as if our Mozarts and Shakespeares squandered their talents on writing jingles for gambling ads and speeches for shifty politicians.

This particular absurdity loomed especially large for me last Sunday morning. First I spent an intellectually engaging 50 minutes with an Iran war session of Private Eye magazine's Page 94 podcast panel discussion program.

This session (wittily-titled "War On Iran: Aya-Tollad You So") featured four fiendishly witty but also fiendishly bright and well-informed commentators. They wrestled with the question "Why did Trump declare his latest perfect, 'very complete', already-won war?"

Then when these worthies were done I tuned to ABC Radio National's The Minefield. There, the healthy, knowledge-wealthy and wise minds of public intellectuals Scott Stephens, Waleed Aly and scholarly international law guru Dr Tamer Morris addressed the theme "Can illegal wars [like Trump's war against Iran) still be legitimate wars?"

Their discussion became, really, a sometimes pained, despairing, baffled attempt to understand what on Earth goes through Trump-like American presidential minds when those minds turn to might-makes-right ideas of invasion and of regime-changing.

Following the seven participants in the two programs (let us call them the Intelligent Seven) one wondered if they were even to be of the same species as the creature, Trump, they were wasting their good hearts and fine minds on trying to fathom.

They were examples of Homo sapiens (sapiens means wise) but were painstakingly analysing a creature, Trump, at best only a human subspecies. Perhaps he is of Homo stupidus, or Homo narcissus-cosmeticus or, thinking of his total inability to feel any empathy for others (for example the 170 Iranian schoolgirls killed by US bombing of their school) Homo sociopathus.

The sheer futility of what the Intelligent Seven were trying to do reminded one of the wisdom of the sardonic US commentator/public speaker Fran Lebowitz.

"Echoing the opinion of former US secretary of state Rex Tillerson, Lebowitz thinks the biggest danger of Trump is that he is a moron," The Guardian has noted, going on to reported her diagnosis that "Everyone says he is crazy - which maybe he is - but the scarier thing about him is that he is stupid. You do not know anyone as stupid as Donald Trump. You just don't."

Yes, it seemed to me that the Intelligent Seven discussants of Trump were, in trying to understand him, up against the problem that, living and moving among people like themselves, they have no experience of pure, deep, human stupidity.

All seven will have read but have probably temporarily forgotten the message of American philosopher Thomas Nagel's immortally brilliant 1974 paper and ensuing book What Is It Like to Be a Bat?

Nagel explains, at scholarly length, why no human can ever truly know what it is like to be a bat, or any other non-human species.

Nagel's methodologies and his analyses apply, too, to all my attempts to imagine what it is like to be any of the humans who are radically unlike me.

I struggle to imagine what it is like to be the kind of Australian who votes "no" to the Voice referendum, or who votes for One Nation, or who thrills to every episode of Married At First Sight.

These people are mysteries to me. I have more in common with bats, and with platypuses, than I have with them.

Don't think that I am scoffing at the Intelligent Seven. I am caught up in the very same Trump-era absurdity syndrome that they are.

Here I am, fiendishly intelligent and poetically sensitive, writing a column about fiendishly stupid Trump. This Saturday's column was going to be an arts-focused poetic meditation on the beauty and the wonder of clouds, predicated on the news that celebrations are under way to mark the 250th anniversary of the birth of John Constable, the famed painter of the beauty and the wonder of clouds. A genius.

That intended column would have been an uplifting and sincere read for you all. I am an enthusiastic member of the Cloud Appreciation Society and care deeply about clouds (Australia's are unique and the best in the world and have been beautifully painted by Australia's Constable-influenced artists) and would have written about them with feeling.

But instead of writing about meteorological and painterly loveliness here I am instead, depraved and debauched by this Trump era, down in journalism's gutters, scribbling about human ugliness.

#USPol #TuckFrump #FuckRWNJs #magamorons #FuckChristoFascists #FuckAllReligion #OrangeOaf #HeyFascistCatch
#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #GreensYEAH #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies #PHONkedinthehead

The absurd tragedy of genius minds trying to comprehend a moron's actions

Can the tools of high philosophy explain the rise of pure stupidity?

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9208955/what-are-australian-values-angus-taylor-pauline-hanson-on-immigration/

BY:
John Minns is emeritus professor of politics and international relations at the ANU and a member of the Refugee Action Campaign in Canberra:

Expect to hear a lot about "Australian values" between now and the next federal election.

Liberal leader Angus Taylor has made it clear that immigration policy will be a central part of his push to win back voters from One Nation. His first speech as leader called for immigration based on "Australian values", claiming that "standards have been too low".

Taylor argued that some people have come to Australia who should not have been allowed in.

"Our borders have been opened to people who hate our way of life. People who don't want to embrace Australia, and who want Australia to change for them", he said.

This is clearly not simply an argument about the size of the immigration program. It is about the people who come, some of whom, he suggests, do not subscribe to our "core beliefs".

His likely future challenger, Andrew Hastie, made it clear that it is the culture of some of those new immigrants that is not acceptable - saying that Australians are being made to feel like "strangers in our own home" - not simply that our home is overcrowded.

The phrase echoed a line from the UK Prime Minister last year which suggested that immigration was making Britain an "island of strangers". Both comments are reminiscent of an infamous 1968 speech by the anti-immigrant politician Enoch Powell in which he warned that non-white immigration would lead to "rivers of blood" and that the British would be made "strangers in their own country".

As Hastie put it while speaking to Peta Credlin on Sky News, "numbers are one thing but who we bring to our country is fundamentally important. They have to sign-up to our values - which are fundamentally Judeo-Christian values".

Both Taylor and Hastie targeted "radical Islam" in the wake of the Bondi massacre. Neither was as blunt as Pauline Hanson who said that there was no such thing as a "good Muslim", but they are all seeking to profit politically from the same constituency.

While Muslims in Australia are bearing the brunt of these attacks, the insistence on a Judeo-Christian ethic also points an accusatory finger at Hinduism - the third largest religion in Australia with probably about 3 per cent of the population - and Buddhism - which is the fourth largest.

There is a utopianism about these demands from the Liberals and One Nation that people should sign-up to Australian values or the door will be shut to them. How exactly, will it be possible for an immigration official to determine whether a prospective migrant has them? Will there be a questionnaire? In which case, how will it be certain that people have answered it truthfully? In the worst-case scenario, would a potential terrorist tick a box saying that they intend to perpetrate violence once they get here? The idea is absurd.

The call for an immigration program based on Australian values might win some votes and perhaps even claw back Liberal voters from One Nation. But it is political posturing which cannot be practically implemented.

Another possibility for excluding those who might make Andrew Hastie feel like a stranger in his own home is to adopt a system which excludes migrants from certain countries and regions - for example from countries with a large Muslim population. It is something which US President Donald Trump has already announced - and he included other countries he doesn't rate highly as well.

The largest Muslim population in the world is in Indonesia. India has more Muslims than Pakistan. Of the alleged Bondi terrorists, one was born in Australia, the other came originally from India. And there are significant Muslim populations in most countries. For those with a fixation about keeping Muslims out of Australia, this must be a truly perplexing problem. Again, it is a utopian demand. It might win some seats, and it will certainly cause harm to many immigrant communities, but it cannot be implemented.

Above all, what are the "values" that we are supposed to hold and to which prospective migrants are to sign-up? Hastie mentioned equality as one. The facts show that Australia has become more unequal over a long period. The wealth of the richest 200 Australians was the equivalent of 8.4 per cent of GDP in 2004. Twenty years later it was 23.7 per cent of GDP. Meanwhile, the poorest 20 per cent of the population owned only 0.4 per cent of total wealth. The level of equality that we should have is a value that has been fought over since European settlement - between trade unions and business owners, social reformers and conservatives, and many others.

What about tolerance as a quintessential Australian value? Academic Stephen McInerney made a widely reported and, in some circles, admired speech in Sydney at a March for Australia protest in August last year. In it he argued that the founding prime ministers, war-time leaders and Australian soldiers were: "fighting for a people - a people bound together by the crimson thread of blood, a distinct people, a unique people, an irreplaceable people, derived from the British Isles and Europe and forged on this continent through ethnogenesis into a new ethnic group, Australians".

The sentiment that we should be fighting for the same thing today - a racially-discriminatory immigration program - is repugnant to me. But he does express clearly what has been behind this "debate" - he wants to reduce the number of non-white people in the country. And he is right in one sense - our history since 1788 is one of racism. The White Australia policy was the first measure passed by the Australian parliament in 1901. It was only phased out from 1966 and not really removed until the Racial Discrimination Act of 1975. Australian Indigenous people were not even counted as Australians officially until 1966. Is this long history of open, biologically-based racism an Australian value? If so, hopefully, most of us don't still hold it.

Is a Judeo-Christian ethic something which has a great record historically? European colonial empires, the destruction of Indigenous societies and many other brutal and inhumane periods were, at least, part of that record.

Australian history is not a simple story of unanimously agreed values - they have always been a contested space. People fought for women's rights, for gay rights, for Indigenous rights, for labour rights over many decades. They had different values from those they fought against - those who were in power and who also had majority popular support at the time. Which side embodied real Australian values?

What values we should have is being contested still. While clearly support for an immigration program based on race or religion is growing, there are many others determined to prevent that happening. This Palm Sunday - tomorrow - a broad range of organisations, including the Anglican Diocese of Canberra and Goulburn, the Uniting Church, St Vincent de Paul Canberra/Goulburn, many other churches, UnionsACT and other unions are supporting a rally under the banner "Refugees and Migrants Welcome Here" - a direct challenge to those who have marched recently under the banner of "Australia for Australians".

The values we as a country and people will hold in the future - perhaps those which we will call "Australian values" - are still being contested today.

#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #GreensYEAH #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies #PHONkedinthehead

Strangers in our own home? The dark history behind the new political slogans

What are Australian values? Equality? Because the rich are getting richer, and the poor poorer.

Unofficial ABC News Bot (@[email protected])

Offshore wind power to save billions of dollars and kilometres of powerlines https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-27/offshort-wind-report-transmission-powerlines-victoria/106463540 #RenewableEnergy #EnergyResearch #EnergyMarkets #EnergyPolicy #WindEnergy

Chinwag Social

https://www.betootaadvocate.com/conservative-voters-teach-albo-a-lesson-by-destroying-his-only-realistic-opponent/

South Australian conservatives have sent a powerful message to the Albanese Government this weekend, by annihilating the only political party capable of removing it from office.

In what is being described as a devastating rebuke of Labor's agenda on immigration, cost of living and energy policy, right-leaning voters across the state turned out in record numbers to reduce the Liberal Party to drops off piss on Angus Taylor's moleskins.

"Anthony Albanese needs to understand that everyday Australians are fed up," explained Gawler retiree and newly-minted One Nation voter Rod Hassall, who successfully helped deliver Labor its largest ever majority in South Australian history.

"This is a wake-up call."

The Premier, who now commands a one-party system that would make Kim Jong-Un's pepperoni slice nipples stand on end like rough cut diamonds, is understood to be deeply rattled by the result.

"I think this really does send a message," said Premier Peter Malinauskas.

"Not a loud and clear one, though."

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson declared the result a "springboard" for the party's federal ambitions, noting that the strategy of splitting the conservative vote three ways while Labor preferences flow at 88 per cent was exactly the kind of bold thinking that would keep Anthony Albanese up at night.

"We've left landmines everywhere," Senator Hanson told supporters.

"Ones that not even Princess Diana could find and defuse."

Federal Opposition Leader Angus Taylor, who took over the Liberal leadership five weeks ago after the party's second coalition split in eight months, said the result was "not a reflection" of the federal party's direction.

"South Australia has always been its own beast," said Taylor.

"But as the rest of us know, they are pretty fucked in the head for a myriad of reasons. I don't think we need to worry about One Nation. They are pretty much the simple rural cousin of the inner city blue-haired greenie. Doing a preference deal with One Nation? Sorry, I'm a Howardist Menzite. I'm not about to destroy the soul of the Liberal Party. I'm not going to sully my own reputation. I mean, Fonterra would just be a footnote in my biography if I killed conservatism in Australia. But I might become Prime Minister?"

The Liberal Party is expected to begin a period of deep soul-searching, which insiders say will involve the same three factions blaming each other for the same structural problems they have been ignoring since 2018, before settling on a new leader who combines the worst qualities of all three.

More to come.

#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #GreensYEAH #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies #PHONkedinthehead

Conservative Voters Teach Albo A Lesson By Destroying His Only Realistic Opponent

ERROL PARKER | Editor-at-large | Contact South Australian conservatives have sent a powerful message to the Albanese Government this weekend, by annihilating the only political party capable of removing it from office. In what is being described as a devastating rebuke of Labor's agenda on immigration, cost of living and energy policy,

The Betoota Advocate
Unofficial ABC News Bot (@[email protected])

Few leaders in Australia are as firmly entrenched in power than Peter Malinauskas https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-23/peter-malinauskas-place-in-labor/106484008 #StateandTerritoryGovernment #StateandTerritoryElections #ALP

Chinwag Social

@MaxG oh this is fantastic! i absolutely love the vinegar of its overt disdain. nicely done!

#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #GreensYEAH #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies #PHONkedinthehead

But unless One Nation’s voters also reckon with the consequences of where their preferences land, they’re not changing the system. They’re reinforcing it.

But in electoral terms it’s something else entirely: a very effective way to keep Labor in power.

clearly poorline is too dimwitted to intellectually grasp this. based on recent federal polling, & last night's result of #saelection, i have to assume that her supporters are equally stupid.

tis basically the main problem with #democracy... #TheGreatUnwashed 🙄🤦‍♀️

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-hanson-paradox-how-a-populist-surge-became-labor-s-best-friend-20260322-p5rmey.html?ref=rss

#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #GreensYEAH #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies #PHONkedinthehead

The Hanson paradox: How a populist surge became Labor’s best friend

Pauline Hanson is right that the electorate has had a “gutful,” but the arithmetic of the South Australian result proves that a fractured right is a gift for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

The Sydney Morning Herald

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9204167/mark-kenny-now-were-more-worried-about-the-unthought-through/

Quote

At the ripe old age of 97, the death of the Cold War espionage writer, Len Deighton, just days ago, came as a different kind of shock.

News of his passing felt somehow subsidiary to a bigger revelation - until last week, Deighton had still been among us.

You knew with John le Carre because he had continued publishing. His last title, Silverview, was released posthumously in 2021.

Deighton, though, the breakthrough author of the Ipcress File (1962), among many, had stopped writing spy fiction three decades ago, retreating to quietude. Apparently, he took a holiday and decided he liked it.

Fame wasn't his thing. He was everything Donald Trump isn't. Talented, studious, restrained, and impeccably subtle.

These qualities infused his characters - espionage being a secret, thankless business - ruthlessly so. It despises headlines and shuns recognition of any kind. Deighton leaned into that (mostly) observing once that nothing destroys a writer like praise.

His work evinced his principles, too. He had what these days would be an unfashionable distaste for violence and decided it would only appear in his stories where required and never as the answer to his characters' problems.

Both authors wrote about human beings by juxtaposing their quotidian struggles with relationships and secrecy and bureaucracy, against big forces, genuine personal danger and crippling moral choices.

Each author knew that the space between their paragraphs was vital - it was where the reader did their end of the work. This, too, matched the atmosphere and tradecraft central to the spy genre where information was invariably thin, dubious and old.

In hindsight we can see the period, both in its fictional evocation and in its history, as marked by profound existential peril, balanced off, albeit, by a useful degree of inertia.

Fractious Cold War crises (Berlin Wall, 1961, Cuban Missile Crisis 1962) were survived through reluctance, back-channel diplomacy, self-preservation and luck.

It was an era when what "could" happen was both known and unthinkable.

Compare that to today when the "unthinkable" is so quickly superseded by the unthought-through.

Again, we live in time of deep global instability and portentous violence.

Gone now though is the institutional inertia. It's been replaced by impulsiveness and the preference for shallow stagecraft over longer-term statecraft.

Or, as recent UK secretary of state for defence Ben Wallace wrote midweek in Britain's The Telegraph, "This is what you get when a superpower with the most powerful armed forces in the world, is run by a collection of TV pundits and golf buddies: pure chaos".

The former Tory minister and ex-British Army officer also observed that one didn't need to be a defence expert to predict what Iran would do when attacked.

"Iran's leaders have always played the only three cards they hold: proxies, hostage taking, and shutting down the Strait of Hormuz."

People who have seen combat tend to know a dud plan when they see one, even if Australia's political class has been blind to it.

It took another plain-speaking ex-commando MP to break ranks, skewering a Trump social media rant against Australia and others for not joining his escapade.

"I thought it was a petulant post from a president under immense pressure," Liberal frontbencher Andrew Hastie told the ABC.

"Yesterday, he said he didn't expect the Strait of Hormuz to be closed for this long - well, as I like to quote Mike Tyson, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face".

I've often wondered what the great historical fiction writers of the Cold War and the lead-up to World War II, would make of the belligerent miscalculations reshaping the world currently.

How would they render the craven appeasement of a lawless US by its allies? How would they characterise the willingness of longstanding democracies to accommodate the aggressive right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu and its extraordinary sway over the Trump White House?

Among the greatest of these writers is the Jewish American Francophile, Alan Furst, 85, whose unfailingly human novels occur against the backdrop of a Europe succumbing to fascism and war. Furst's characters read the signs of German militarisation and see the writing on the wall as Czechoslovakia, Austria, Poland and Hungary are incorporated, overrun, or captured by local fascists.

Furst's ordinary heroes take huge risks in smuggling downed airmen back to Britain or obtaining fragmentary intel about German armaments manufacture - tiny scraps of information such as the production orders of a particular aviation wire or what grade of gun oil is being issued to Wehrmacht divisions. The former to guess at the number of bombers being built, the latter to determine if weapons are being prepared to operate in an invasion of France or the frozen East.

Underneath such story lines, runs a truth so present as to never require mention - that democracy and tolerance and culture and human rights offer the only way forward.

Of course, we know where Europe's journey led. But what about now? If the US didn't countenance a regionalised war, the closure of a vital sea lane, and a calamitous oil shock, what hope the rest of us?

And don't forget, before calling NATO allies "cowards," Trump announced he would have the honour of "taking Cuba". You wouldn't read about it.

  • Mark Kenny is The Canberra Times' political analyst and a professor at the ANU's Australian Studies Institute. He hosts the Democracy Sausage podcast. He writes a column every Sunday.

Unquote

#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies #USPol #TuckFrump #FuckRWNJs #magamorons #FuckChristoFascists #FuckAllReligion #OrangeOaf #HeyFascistCatch

We used to fear the unthinkable. Now we're more worried about the unthought-through

It's a different world we now live in.

little better that good government could not be a reason for preferring Labor.

Labor's embrace of the national security state has made it highly illiberal and authoritarian about civil liberties, and about using legislation as a blunderbuss against behaviour of which it, or one of its police or security officials, disapproves. In some fields, as with the Australian ISIS brides, Albanese was mean-minded, bigoted, and incapable of seeing where a statesman should stand.

Labor assumes that Greens will be virtually automatic in supporting its legislation - again on the theory that bad as they are, they are preferable to the Coalition, or worse, Pauline Hanson. But Albanese misses no opportunity to attack the Greens, to attack their motives and their practicality, and to limit the possibility of their declaring any sort of "win", even with good ideas.

His monolithic focus on Labor credit is more than disrespect for the individuals or ideologies involved: it disrespects those who voted for them. Among these are groups whose (two-party preferred) preference for Labor should be being treasured and celebrated: young people, women, the better educated, and migrants. None of Labor's charisma is being beamed in their direction. If they are forefront in Albanese's mind, it is far from obvious, in major part because he does not try to engage or connect.

Albanese's style distresses traditional Labor supporters as much as it does people now accustomed to voting for the Greens and progressive independents. Some think wearily that whatever happens, Labor will probably do a better job than the other side. For the moment, they might be right.

But a moment may come over Australia's un-Australian defence policies, its sheer awfulness on refugee issues, its mark-time on indigenous affairs and its limited visions for health and education where some will say enough! That Labor is not worth fighting for. Or crossing the road for. That's what the diehards should fear while preparing their winter quarters.

  • Jack Waterford is a former editor of The Canberra Times.

Unquote

#AusPol #WhyTheFuckIsLabor #HahahahaLiebs #NatsAreNuts #VoteGreens #VoteProgIndies 2/2