The Bleeding Edge

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — June 5, 2026

When I was studying telecommunications at DeVry Institute of Technology in the late 1980s, the head of the program, Al Payette, used to tell us something we all understood perfectly well.

“The cutting edge is also the bleeding edge.”

Nobody misunderstood him. Nobody was confused about what he meant. We knew that working in a rapidly changing technical field meant risk. Technology moves fast. Industries shift. Companies rise and fall.

What we did not understand — what none of us understood — was how quickly most of us would feel that first cut.

The bleeding started almost immediately.

For many of us, it started the day we walked across the stage and received our diplomas.

Building the Networks

My degree was in telecommunications — voice and data systems — but my professional work was in data communications.

In the mid-1990s, that meant something very specific. Businesses were beginning to connect computers together in ways that are completely taken for granted today.

Local area networks. Wide area networks. Ethernet cabling. Early routers and gateways. Offices that once ran isolated machines were being transformed into connected systems.

From roughly 1994 until about 1998, that was my work. I helped bring the first LAN and WAN networks into businesses. We wired buildings. We connected offices. We turned disconnected computers into networks.

Today those systems form the basic infrastructure of modern commerce. At the time, they were still new enough that someone had to physically install them, configure them, and make them work.

For a few years, it felt like standing inside the future.

Then the work began to disappear.

By 1998 the number of contracts was shrinking. By the time the telecom contraction and the collapse of the dot-com bubble hit around 2000, many of those positions had simply vanished.

The expansion of data communications had stopped.

And the people who had built it were suddenly expendable.

The Contradiction

What made that moment even stranger was what was happening in the public conversation about technology jobs.

Experienced engineers and networking specialists were being laid off. Telecommunications companies were collapsing or consolidating. Entire segments of the industry were shrinking.

At the same time, corporate leaders were appearing before Congress arguing that the United States faced a shortage of trained engineers.

Bill Gates testified that American companies needed more high-skill visas because they supposedly could not find enough qualified technical workers.

But thousands of qualified workers already existed.

Many of them were unemployed.

Alan Greenspan acknowledged that the data communications expansion had contracted, yet the policy conversation quickly shifted toward importing additional technical labor rather than stabilizing the careers that had already been built.

Whether those decisions were wise or not is something economists will debate for decades.

But if you were living through that moment, the contradiction was impossible to miss.

You were told your skills were desperately needed at the exact moment you were discovering they were not.

The Slow Start

I graduated in October of 1990, entering the workforce during the recession that followed the end of the Cold War and the so-called peace dividend period.

Economists have documented that graduating during an economic downturn can affect a person’s earnings and opportunities for years, sometimes for decades. A slow start can echo through an entire career.

That reality shaped my life more than I understood at the time.

In 1998 I was earning $28.50 an hour in the technical field.

By the 2000s, after the industry contraction, the most I ever made in technical work again was about $17 an hour — for positions that had once paid far more.

Eventually, like many people whose technical careers collapsed during that period, I spent much of my working life in other fields simply because those were the jobs that remained available.

The official story of the technology revolution rarely includes that part.

But it happened.

Occupy

By 2011 the economic consequences of those structural changes had become impossible to ignore.

That was the year Occupy Wall Street began.

I became involved in July of 2011, before the first tents went up in Zuccotti Park. Like many others, I believed the country needed to confront the economic system that had produced the financial crisis and the bailouts that followed.

When the movement spread to Chicago, I participated there as well.

But movements, like institutions, are not immune to hierarchy or internal politics. Solidarity is often more complicated than people imagine.

Instead of finding common ground, I found myself publicly ridiculed and pushed aside by activists who decided I was not one of the people they wanted representing their cause.

After the economy had already knocked me down, even the people claiming to challenge that system found ways to exclude me.

That experience taught me something important.

Power dynamics exist everywhere.

Leaving the United States

On September 5, 2023, I arrived in the Philippines to live with my wife.

Her name was Luz.

We hoped to build a life together here.

She died of cancer on September 3, 2025, at 5:15 in the morning. We buried her on September 11. She is entombed above her parents in a small family structure here in Leyte.

We never reached our second wedding anniversary.

After she died, I stayed.

The Archive

Today I live in Baybay City continuing the work that has defined the last several years of my life.

I write.

Thousands of essays now exist in what has become the WPS News archive — or perhaps more accurately, the WPS News knowledge base.

It is a record of events, policies, and power structures as I have witnessed and analyzed them.

The audience is not large. The work is not profitable.

But documentation matters.

History is not written only by institutions. It is also written by individuals who decide that the truth of their experience deserves to be recorded.

Extraction

Looking back across the decades, a pattern becomes difficult to ignore.

Modern systems extract value from people.

Technical workers build the networks that power the digital economy. Activists lend their time and energy to movements. Writers produce analysis that circulates widely.

But the people performing that labor often receive little in return.

Structural extraction without compensation is theft.

That sentence may sound blunt, but if you spend enough years watching the same pattern repeat, it becomes difficult to describe it any other way.

The Bleeding Edge

Al Payette warned us that the cutting edge was also the bleeding edge.

He was right.

Most of us understood there would be risks in working at the edge of a rapidly changing industry. What we did not understand was how quickly the system would turn on us.

Decades later, I understand.

And I am still here.

So I write.

Because whether anyone wants to hear it or not, the story of what happened to us deserves to be told — without extraction.

For more social commentary, please see Occupy 2.5 at https://Occupy25.com

References

Greenspan, A. (2004). The Economic Outlook. Federal Reserve Board remarks.

Gates, B. (2008). Testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Science and Technology regarding high-skill immigration.

#Economy #extraction #Labor #OccupyMovement #socialCommentary #structuralInequality #technologyHistory #telecomCollapse

The sandpile metaphor matters because collapse often looks sudden from the outside.

But inside the system, pressure has been accumulating for a long time.

The crisis is not always the failure. Sometimes it is the correction.
👇
https://reviewsrantsandraves.substack.com/p/what-the-sandpile-knows-a-foreword

#SystemsThinking #Essays #Precarity #Philosophy #Sociology #PersonalEconomy #ComplexSystems
#Precarity #Economics #PersonalFinance #InstitutionalFailure
#SocialMobility
#ModernLife
#Resilience
#MeaningMaking
#StructuralInequality
#HumanSystems

What the Sandpile Knows: A foreword on systems, survival, crisis, and the search for a more accurate map.

A foreword to What the Sandpile Knows: a series on wrong maps, category errors, structural betrayal, personal economy, crisis, and renewal.

Reviews, Rants & Raves

Merit, Machinery, and the Manufacture of Success

By Cliff Potts, CSO, and Editor-in-Chief of WPS News

Baybay City, Leyte, Philippines — May 3, 2026

The Equation We Are Taught

Most of us grow up believing in a simple equation:

Work + Merit = Success.

The formula feels moral. It feels rational. It feels fair. Put in the effort, produce value, and society will respond accordingly. Recognition, status, and compensation will follow contribution.

But that equation is not how modern systems actually operate.

The painful realization is not that work lacks value. It is that work does not automatically convert into visible success. The conversion mechanism is something else entirely.

Success as a Social Signal

Success is not a private determination. It is a social signal. Society confers it through recognizable markers: income, institutional status, scale of audience, amplification, and visible influence.

If those signals are absent, society does not classify the individual as successful.

This is not mystical. It is sociological.

Recognition is relational. It requires:

  • Network proximity
  • Repeated interaction
  • Shared institutional spaces
  • Amplification channels
  • Social reinforcement

Merit alone does not generate these conditions.

Sociologist Robert K. Merton described how societies define culturally approved goals and prescribe socially approved means of achieving them (Merton, 1938). When individuals pursue the goals but lack access to the approved means, strain results. That strain does not disappear simply because effort was sincere.

The gap between labor and recognition is not accidental. It is structural.

The Machinery of Amplification

In contemporary systems, success is manufactured through machinery:

Visibility × Network × Timing × Demand × Power.

Production is only one variable in that equation.

A person can produce consistently, coherently, and intelligently for decades. But without amplification infrastructure — institutions, partnerships, distribution channels, patronage, algorithmic leverage — the work remains low-visibility.

This is not proof that the work lacks merit. It is proof that merit and amplification are separate systems.

Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of capital distinguishes between economic capital, social capital, and cultural capital (Bourdieu, 1986). A writer may accumulate cultural capital (knowledge, intellectual output) but lack social capital (embedded networks) and economic capital (financial leverage). Without conversion between these forms, recognition stalls.

The machinery matters.

The Emotional Cost of Non-Conversion

When sustained labor does not convert into social acknowledgment, the result is not merely disappointment. It is existential dissonance.

If society defines success publicly — and it does — then absence of public endowment produces a clear verdict:

Not successful.

This verdict may say nothing about intrinsic value. It may say nothing about intellectual coherence. It may say nothing about moral seriousness.

But it does describe the visible outcome.

The system’s silence feels like judgment because silence functions as judgment in a recognition economy.

That is the broken heart at the center of the modern merit myth.

Work, Worth, and Recognition

It is tempting to respond by redefining success privately: “If I feel successful, I am successful.” But that maneuver avoids the structural reality.

Success, as commonly understood, is public.

It is conferred.

It is relational.

It is measured externally.

Acknowledging this does not require surrendering belief in the value of one’s work. It requires separating two different questions:

  • Does the work have merit?
  • Has the work been amplified and publicly endowed?
  • The first is a matter of substance.
    The second is a matter of machinery.

    Confusing the two leads to despair. Separating them leads to clarity.

    The Experiment

    Over a lifetime of production, one can document the experiment: sustained effort does not guarantee public success. That finding is not self-pity. It is observation.

    If society defines success through visible signals, and those signals are absent, then by society’s metric the individual is not successful.

    That conclusion can be accepted without concluding that the work itself is worthless.

    The myth is not that merit does not exist.

    The myth is that merit automatically converts.

    It does not.

    Recognition is manufactured.

    Success is signaled.

    And work, by itself, is only one component of a much larger machine.

    References

    Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

    Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084686

    #amplificationSystems #meritMyth #recognitionEconomy #socialCapital #sociologyOfStatus #structuralInequality #success

    #StructuralInEquality: Billions worldwide struggle with #hunger, #homelessness, #poverty, untenable healthcare costs, and disasters because Congress prioritizes #CarbonBomb #dictators in #WarsForOil that profit of big weapons contractors.

    https://fcnl.quorum.us/campaign/45504/

    Maybe this could solve some of the challenges of incentives faced by #tech #coops but not #venturecapital backed #startups.

    Scaling up the cooperative movement shouldn't have to rely entirely on people's good will.

    However it's important to avoid the #structuralinequality caused by #capitalism

    2/

    "One of the little-noticed moves by President Biden in his first days in office was an executive order that required federal agencies to examine their policies and programs to identify whether and how they perpetuate barriers to equal opportunity. It was a stab at addressing structural inequality in the wake of the national protests over the death of George Floyd. At least some of that work seems to be coming to fruition."

    #StructuralInequality

    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/01/treasury-department-study-white-people-get-90-percent-of-the-benefits-of-many-tax-breaks/

    Treasury study: White people get 90 percent of the benefits of many tax breaks

    Republicans have never seen a tax break they didn't love, even though they cost more than poverty programs.

    Mother Jones