A jury just found Meta and YouTube negligent in a social media addiction case.

This could change how platforms are held accountable—and even impact Section 230.

New episode of the @sharedsecurity podcast out now!

Watch this episode on YouTube:
https://youtu.be/UNVP7ABOkwU

Listen and subscribe wherever you like to get your podcasts:
https://sharedsecurity.net/subscribe

https://sharedsecurity.net/2026/04/06/meta-youtube-found-negligent-a-turning-point-for-big-tech/

#podcast #cybersecurity #privacy #meta #youtube #section230

The trial lawyers come for online free speech | Blaze Media

Trial lawyers are poised to accomplish in courtrooms nationwide what politicians have thus far failed to write into statute. The effects of this effort — undertaken without the deliberation of the nation’s representative bodies — are likely to rival those of even the most sweeping laws.

https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/the-trial-lawyers-come-for-online-free-speech

Weakening Speech Protections Will Punish All of Us—Not Just #Meta

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/dont-weaken-speech-protections-just-punish-meta

#privacy #Section230 #FreeSpeech #Google #YouTube #Instagram #Facebook

yahoo news | Meta, Google under attack as court cases bypass 30-year-old legal shield

Since the mid‑1990s, internet platforms have been shielded from liability for user‑generated content by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Recent jury verdicts, however, are eroding that protection. A New Mexico jury found Meta liable for child‑safety harms, while a Los Angeles jury held Facebook’s parent and Google’s YouTube negligent in a personal‑injury trial. At the same time, victims of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal filed a class‑action suit accusing Google’s AI‑powered “AI Mode” of exposing personal information, arguing that the feature functions as more than a neutral search index.

The lawsuits target the design of platforms rather than the specific content they host, alleging that features such as autoplay, recommendation algorithms, notifications and AI‑generated summaries deliberately foster addiction and facilitate the spread of sensitive data. Plaintiffs claim these design choices operate like “digital casinos,” causing mental‑health harms to minors and exposing individuals to harassment and threats. Attorneys for the plaintiffs contend that the companies knew of these risks yet failed to act, and they are using systematic litigation to carve out “divots” in Section 230’s shield.

Lawmakers and scholars are debating how to respond. Critics say the law has let tech firms avoid meaningful safeguards for users, especially children, while supporters warn that weakening Section 230 could stifle innovation and free speech. Proposals range from tightening the statute’s protections only for companies that meet strict privacy and transparency standards, to outright repeal. The pending appeals and potential Supreme Court review will shape whether the next generation of AI‑driven platforms can continue operating under the current legal framework.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/03/meta-google-under-attack-court-cases-bypass-30-year-old-legal-shield.html

#meta #google #facebook #section230 #communicationsdecencyact