"If there is a peace deal which then leads the Security Council to ask us to defer an investigation, then that's a matter - that's a political process for the Security Council. But as far as we're concerned...at the end of the day, it does not stop the way that justice is delivered," Deputy Prosecutor #Khan said, citing the court's founding #Rome_Statute.

which is contrary to the provisions of the #Rome_Statute and has prevented the court from exercising its functions and powers, the court's Pre-Trial Chamber said in a statement.

The #ICC points out that one's diplomatic immunity, including that of the president, is not an obstacle to the execution of an international court order. "In view of the seriousness of #Mongolia’s failure to cooperate with the Court, the Chamber deemed it necessary to refer the matter to the Assembly of States Parties,"

#Putin may attend the #G20 summit in #Brazil. #Brazil is a state party to the #Rome_Statute.

#Moscow said that the #Russian president has not yet decided whether to attend the summit in #Brazil. #Peskov said the #Kremlin would inform about it "when a decision is made."

By the way, #Brazil has a large #Ukrainian diaspora - the number of #Ukrainians in #Brazil is estimated at 400,000 to 500,000 people.

#ukraine #putinisamasskiller #putinisawarcriminal @kardinal691

that #Lithuania had created a "historical precedent:" for the first time, a request on the situation in the state, which is not among the signatories of the #Rome_Statute, was submitted to the #ICC. The #Belarusian opposition insists that the crimes of #Lukashenko's regime are cross-border in nature and, therefore, fall under the jurisdiction of the court.

Source: https://rus.delfi.lv/57862/abroad/120044471/litva-peredala-v-mus-dokumenty-dlya-vozbuzhdeniya-dela-protiv-lukashenko

#ukraine #putinisamasskiller #putinisawarcriminal @kardinal691

Литва передала в МУС документы для возбуждения дела против Лукашенко

Как отмечает LRT, речь идет о таких преступлениях как принудительная депортация и преследование людей за политические взгляды. Беларусь не признает юрисдикцию МУС

detained in #South_Africa. However, almost daily consultations ended with #Putin cancelling the trip.

So, the #Kremlin has found another country - #Mongolia.

What will happen after #Putin's visit to a country that has signed the #Rome_Statute when he returns home safely? A dangerous precedent will be set, especially for the countries of the Global South."#Putin went to #Mongolia, no one arrested him there, and everything went well. So, maybe we should invite #Putin too?"

From https://t.me/pravdaGerashchenko_en

When the International Criminal Court in #The_Hague issued an arrest warrant for #Putin, many people spoke of the #Putin's fear that he could now be arrested in many countries around the world - if he traveled to countries that have ratified the #Rome_Statute, of course.

However, #Putin is the man who destroyed international law with the occupation of #Crimea and other #Ukrainian regions.

Pravda_Gerashchenko_en

Ukrainian patriot. Advisor to Internal Affairs Minister (2021-2023). Institute of the Future founder.

Telegram
Situation in Ukraine: ICC judges issue arrest warrants against Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu and Valery Vasilyevich Gerasimov

On 24 June 2024, Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or “Court”), composed of Judge Rosario Salvatore Aitala, Presiding, Judge Sergio Gerardo Ugalde Godínez and Judge Haykel Ben Mahfoudh, issued warrants of arrest for two individuals, Mr Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu and Mr Valery Vasilyevich Gerasimov, in the context of the situation in Ukraine for alleged international crimes committed from at least 10 October 2022 until at least 9 March 2023. Mr Sergei Kuzhugetovich Shoigu, born on 21 May 1955, Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation at the time of the alleged conduct, and Mr Valery Vasilyevich Gerasimov, born on 8 September 1955, Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and First Deputy Minister of Defence of the Russian Federation at the time of the alleged conduct, are each allegedly responsible for the war crime of directing attacks at civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(ii) of the Rome Statute) and the war crime of causing excessive incidental harm to civilians or damage to civilian objects (article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute), and the crime against humanity of inhumane acts under article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute. There are reasonable grounds to believe they bear individual criminal responsibility for the aforementioned crimes for (i) having committed the acts jointly and/or through others (article 25(3)(a) of the Rome Statute), (ii) ordering the commission of the crimes (article 25(3)(b) of the Rome Statute), and/or (iii) for their failure to exercise proper control over the forces under their command (article 28 of the Rome Statute). The two warrants of arrest were issued following applications filed by the Prosecution. Pre-Trial Chamber II considered that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the two suspects bear responsibility for missile strikes carried out by the Russian armed forces against the Ukrainian electric infrastructure from at least 10 October 2022 until at least 9 March 2023. During this time-frame, a large number of strikes against numerous electric power plants and sub-stations were carried out by the Russian armed forces in multiple locations in Ukraine. Pre-Trial Chamber II found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the alleged strikes were directed against civilian objects, and for those installations that may have qualified as military objectives at the relevant time, the expected incidental civilian harm and damage would have been clearly excessive to the anticipated military advantage. In this regard, the Chamber observed that one of the core objectives of international humanitarian law is the protection of civilians in  armed conflicts. Therefore, the Chamber, when assessing criminal responsibility for the alleged perpetration of war crimes during the conduct of hostilities, must consider whether the alleged conduct abided by the principle of distinction, which prohibits the use of armed force against civilians and other protected persons. As part of its assessment of the actions of those suspected of serious violations of international humanitarian law, insofar as these are codified as crimes under the Rome Statute, the Chamber will always consider the effect of said actions on the safety and security of civilians, including the most vulnerable, such as the elderly, women and children.   Pre-Trial Chamber II also determined that the alleged campaign of strikes constitutes a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts against a civilian population, carried out pursuant to a State policy, within the meaning of article 7 of the Statute. Therefore, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspects intentionally caused great suffering or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health, thus bearing criminal responsibility for the crime against humanity of other inhumane acts, as defined in article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute. Considering that the key factual allegations are duly supported by evidence and other relevant material submitted at this stage of the proceedings by the Prosecution, the Chamber considered that the statutory requirements are met to issue the sought warrants of arrest. The content of the warrants is issued ‘secret’ in order to protect witnesses and to safeguard the investigations. However, mindful that conduct similar to that addressed in the warrants of arrest, which amounts to violations of international humanitarian law, appears to be ongoing, the Chamber considered that public awareness of the warrants may contribute to the prevention of the further commission of crimes pursuant to article 58(1)(b)(iii) of the Rome Statute. Therefore, Pre-Trial Chamber II considered it to be in the interest of justice to authorise the Registry to publicly disclose the existence of the warrants, the name of the suspects, the crimes for which the warrants are issued, and the modes of liability. For further information on the situation in Ukraine, check here. For further information, please contact Fadi El Abdallah, Spokesperson and Head of Public Affairs Unit, International Criminal Court, by telephone at: +31 (0)70 515-9152 or +31 (0)6 46448938 or by e-mail at: [email protected]. You can also follow the Court's activities on X, Instagram,  Facebook, YouTube and Flickr

International Criminal Court