Mich wĂŒrden noch andere Quellen interessieren:
"#Schweden investiert nicht mehr in Bildschirme und kehrt zu #BĂŒchern zurĂŒck. Die Regierung des skandinavischen Landes hat ihren Plan fĂŒr die digitale Bildung gestrichen und die Mittel fĂŒr die Verteilung von #SchulbĂŒchern umgeschichtet: Sie will fĂŒr jeden SchĂŒler ein Buch pro Fach ausgeben. Dieser Schritt erfolgt nach einem RĂŒckschlag bei den #PIRLS-LeseverstĂ€ndnistests."
https://wochenblatt.cc/tschuess-bildschirme-willkommen-buch/
AsunciĂłn: Das Projekt, BĂŒcher durch Computer zu ersetzen, ist gescheitert, wie man in Schweden einrĂ€umt. Damit verabschiedet man sich von einem Modell, das Santiago Peña begeistert, der bei seinem jĂŒngsten Besuch in Uruguay sagte, dass das Ceibal-Projekt, das hier teilweise nachgeahmt wurde, mit âeinem Computer⊠weiter lesen
I dagens DN stÄr att lÀsa att Estland sticker ut som ett gott exempel pÄ lÀnder dÀr elevers lÀsförstÄelse Àr mycket god.
Det visar sig att vuxna estlÀndare lÀser lÀngst tid per dag i jÀmförelse med övriga europeer. DÀr satsar man pÄ bibliotek, bÄde offentliga och skolbibliotek med utbildade bibliotekarier.
TillgÄng pÄ böcker. Vuxna som lÀsande förebilder.
Dra dina egna slutsatser.
#pirls #dn #skolbibliotek #lÀsförstÄelse
6. I think #COVID19 infection rates of student populations should also be taken into account. Students and households were affected differentially. Our paper on Ontario showed higher rates for student infections in schools in more deprived areas. This could have varied cognitive and policy effects, e.g., more closures in some areas or individual exclusion during infection periods.
Here's a useful commentary on #PIRLS by the UNESCO GEM Report Team.
The first robust cross-national evidence on the impact of COVID-19 on the learning outcomes of primary school age children was released yesterday. The 2021 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, or PIRLS, was the fifth round of a survey which has been organized by IEA since 2001. Conducted every five years, PIRLS study looks at [âŠ]
2. This is generally true of international assessments. The last round of #PIRLS was conducted in 2021 during intermittent global #School closures which were very context specific. Meaning closures wouldnât account for all differences as there were already existing differences.
3. Singapore, for example, coming out on top isnât that surprising as it generally performs highly. Compare to South Africa where there has been disinvestment in #Education and #Reading for some years.
More on #PIRLS which has been getting a lot of attention over the last week.
To interpret results, important to note:
1. There were large discrepancies in reading scores coming into the pandemic. Globally, >400 million couldnât perform basic literacy tasks after having attended school. There were country-level differences between low-income and high-income countries, and within country differences between income groups.
The international #PIRLS #Reading test scores came out on the 2021 assessment.
Much attention has been on South Africa, where we learned that 81% of children in grade 4 could not read a few simple paragraphs and answer basic questions.
This is an interesting article by Nic Spaull on lessons South Africa and other countries can learn from Brazil.
đ»Jeg har generelt den holdning, at der ikke er det, som lĂŠsning ikke er godt for. Det, synes jeg, understĂžttes af forskningen, som viser, at det har en lang rĂŠkke gavnlige effekter at lĂŠse. BĂ„de psykisk og fysisk. Og sĂ„ ved vi, at den, som lĂŠser, har bedre chancer for at klare sig godt i alle aspekter af livet«.
Ringhotel Zum Stein
Loys Bonod
Ove
Bernd Sonneck đ
Karin
Prof Prachi Srivastava
Rico_Roswall