Mastodawn

We asked for a small workshop, but looks like we must configure NeurIPS 😅 #openreview

RE: https://mastodon.social/@alelazic/116247212025880664

The journal uses the Transparent Peer Review system. I didn't put my name in the Comments to the author but I did agree to something like "I want my name visible in the TRP". So if the paper gets accepted my name will be linked to my open review. But will it be known to the authors at this stage? #openreview #openscience

Volker Stolz Feb 3

RE: https://mastodon.social/@shriramk/116006853263047366

“OpenReview’s backend obligingly returned the full, de-anonymized profiles of reviewers, authors, and area chairs, not just for ICLR 2026, but for any conference hosted on the platform.

Double-blind review, the sacred cow of CS publishing, had just become Naked Review.”
#OpenReview

sayzard Jan 26

Gautam Kamath (@thegautamkamath)

ICLR2026 채택 결정이 OpenReview에 공개되고 있다는 알림으로, 메타리뷰어들이 어려운 상황 속에서도 심사·결정 업무를 수행해 커뮤니티에 기여했다는 감사 표현을 담고 있습니다.

https://x.com/thegautamkamath/status/2015785057357553937

#iclr #openreview #conference #ml #research

Gautam Kamath (@thegautamkamath) on X

#ICLR2026 decisions are coming out now on OpenReview. Props to the metareviewers, who had a very difficult job, but stepped up in a time of crisis when the community needed them. I appreciate you.

X (formerly Twitter)

Show thread

Synapsenkitzler Dec 23

Thank you for your work. 🌼

Some hashtags for spreading the posting:
#openreview #openscience #openaccess
@timnitGebru

Laurent Gatto Dec 23

I got this very weird email from #OpenReview

A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview
(https://openreview.net/forum/pineau|a_message_from_ai_research_leaders_join_us_in_supporting_openreview)

First, I appreciate OpenReview because they provide a way to organise conference submissions and reviews to Bioc and EuroBioc conferences.

That would be the reason I would consider supporting them.

NOT because AI conferences benefit from it.

If OpenReview is so central to AI< why can't any of the AI companies not donate a tiny drop of their funds to guarantee OpenReview sustainability for the forthcoming future?

I now had to check that OpenReview wasn't using our reviews to train AI models - I could see any indication they do.

A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview

IJCAI Conference Nov 30

Double-Blind Intact: IJCAI Confirms No OpenReview Use. #Statement Never relying on #OpenReview, IJCAI confirms that its peer-review process — including IJCAI-ECAI 2026 — remains fully uncompromised, using the independent ChairingTool platform:
https://linkedin.com/pulse/statement-double-blind-intact-ijcai-e3b5f

#IJCAI2026 #ECAI2026

Peter Bloem Nov 29

A thought from 2016.

It took us nine years and a bit. In retrospect, I think we held out pretty long.

#iclr #openreview

Gerard de Melo Nov 28

The #ICLR2026 #OpenReview drama continues! 🙀 After the leak of anonymous reviewer identities, it is understandable that we need to mitigate potential effects this may have had. Still, it can feel disappointing for the majority of authors who played by the rules. Let's hope the ACs do a good job!

Lê Nguyên Hoang Nov 28

Yesterday, an #OpenReview vulnerability led to the leak of reviewer identities of all the major academic AI conferences, including the ongoing #ICLR2026 conferences. #ICLRLeaks This is both a huge disaster, and an opportunity to tackle the serious flaws of AI research. eu.36kr.com/en/p/3572028...

Academic Circle in Uproar: ICL...

Academic Circle in Uproar: ICLR Reviewers Reveal Identities, Low Scores Given by Friends

True Open Review: Unveiling Transparent and Authentic Evaluations