Block Trump’s nuclear testing plan!

Putin has already floated the idea of Russian nuclear testing in response to Trump’s plan.

Demand Progress

The Australian people said no to nuclear very clearly at the election & the coalition still think it’ll be a goer. I still say #NoNuclear #AusPol.

https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/politics/australian-politics/2025/10/02/coalition-nuclear

Coalition says Australia should join 'nuclear renaissance'

The opposition leader has issued a directive to her front bench to respect their colleagues' portfolios as she pushes her team to be more proactive on policy.

Nationals Leader David Littleproud says nuclear power policy 'sensible' next step

Nationals are promising to introduce a nuclear power policy at the next election, despite it previously causing a rift in the Coalition.

ABC News
Angry nuclear lobby backs off as landmark SMR deal confirms CSIRO’s bleak cost estimates

Nuclear critics of the GenCost report have gone quiet, perhaps because the first real western contract for SMRs has proved the CSIRO’s cost estimates to be spot on.

RenewEconomy
I'm against nuclear for various reasons, but it doesn't even make sense from a energy security or financial perspective #NoNuclear https://davidtoke.substack.com/p/why-new-nuclear-power-is-a-bad-way
Why new nuclear power is a bad way to balance solar and wind

In the UK it has almost become an accepted truth in the media that new nuclear power is needed because there is no other practical or cheaper way to balance fluctuating wind and solar power.

Energy Revolutions by David Toke

Likewise, nuclear is an extremely toxic and very expensive distraction that is heavily subsidized by fossil fuels at every stage of its existence.

There's a reason why no matter how many NPPs we built in the past, our fossil addiction only deepened. A significant part of that terrible trend was a direct result of nuclear maintenance costs.

#ClimateCrisis #ClimateDestruction #KeepItInTheGround #NoNuclear

#Australia #NoNuclear #TheGuardian

Economists issue letter calling for clean energy, not nuclear

An open letter from 60 Australian economists has rejected the Coalition’s nuclear energy plan, promoting instead the subsidising of household clean energy policies, including incentives for home battery storage.

The organiser of the letter, Gareth Bryant, an associate professor in political economy at the University of Sydney, says the letter is intended as an intervention in the election campaign, reports AAP.

“As economists, energy analysts and policy specialists we strongly support government investment in household clean energy and industrial electrification and not in nuclear energy,” the letter says.

It says simple household clean energy upgrades can deliver immediate cost-of-living benefits and reductions in carbon emissions, and electrification can safeguard the future of industrial jobs and the communities that rely on them.

The economists, from a range of Australian universities and other tertiary institutions, said the construction of nuclear power plants would take at least 15 years at a cost of at least $330bn:

It would result in higher household energy costs, drain investment away from renewable energy and energy-intensive manufacturing, and leave the Australian economy precariously over-dependent on increasingly automated mineral extraction.

The economists said they support a nationwide program to upgrade homes and industry with clean renewable energy.

They said the technologies to fund should include large-scale home electrification with smart appliances to provide bill savings, energy-efficiency upgrades and battery storage, which can save surplus solar for night-time use, and hot water retrofits for more efficient water heating.

The facts about energy sources in Australia.

https://afae.net.au/

#Australia
#AusPol
#NoNuclear
#NoAUKUS

Australians For Affordable Energy – Australians For Affordable Energy

#dutton #nuclear bid short on detail - but who cares ? #ICareALot #auspol #MurdochGutterMedia #nonuclear