Client Challenge

Martin Wolf tại Hội nghị Bund 2025 dự đoán đại lục Trung Quốc có thể trở thành thị trường tiêu dùng lớn nhất thế giới. Quy mô nền kinh tế sẽ mang lại nhiều cơ hội cho công nghệ, thương mại điện tử và du lịch. Hãy nắm bắt xu hướng này! #ThịTrườngTiêuDùng #ĐạiLụcTrungQuốc #MartinWolf #KinhDoanh https://ift.tt/OydLroc
Martin Wolf: Đại lục Trung Quốc dự kiến trở thành thị trường tiêu dùng hàng đầu thế giới - Thế Giới Trong Tầm Tay

Martin Wolf cho rằng đại lục Trung Quốc có thể trở thành thị trường tiêu dùng lớn nhất thế giới, nhờ sự mở rộng của nền kinh tế ngay cả khi không có sự gia tăng lớn trong tỷ lệ tiêu dùng.

Thế Giới Trong Tầm Tay - Thế giới của bạn, tin tức của bạn, cách bạn muốn
Could AI redefine the future of work and society? Paul Krugman and Martin Wolf explore AI's real capabilities and historical parallels, debating its potential to disrupt white-collar jobs and deepen inequality amid slow tech shifts. They urge nuanced views on AI's broad impacts and societal adaptation challenges. Read more for insights on AI's evolving role. https://paulkrugman.substack.com/p/talking-ai-with-martin-wolf #PaulKrugman #MartinWolf #artificialintelligence #technology #economics #labor #history #inequality
Talking AI With Martin Wolf

In which we admit to being confused

Paul Krugman

The enshittification of (political) economy: ‘AI’ as the last redoubt of neoliberal centrism

In Martin Wolf’s The Crisis of Democratic Capitalism, he observes how stagnant productivity creates a zero-sum dynamic in the economy. The book was published in early 2023 and the evidence would suggest the problem has only got worse since then:

In a country with fast increases in productivity everybody will get better off, unless inequality rises very quickly. But in A country with stagnant productivity, such as Italy over the last two decades or the UK over the last one and a half decades, the standard of living can rise for some only if the standard of living for others falls. This then becomes a zero sum economy. If A wins, B through C must lose.

This has been intensified by the post-Covid inflation shock. The headline figures are bad enough but the effect is segmented, hitting poorest householders and renters the hardest, with a tendency to underrepresent the cost of housing (albeit in a way that is methodologically complex and doesn’t permit easy generalisation). If we remain within this dynamic indefinitely then, at least in principle, we would see a continual immiseration of the vast majority of the population. This is partly inflationary (i.e. declining real wages for the majority of the population) and partly due to Piketty’s r > g dynamic (i.e. returns on capital grow faster than the economy as a whole). This means that those who already have wealth will tend to increase it faster while the majority of the population get poorer, not least of all through out competing the majority for assets like housing.

Unfortunately higher inflation is here to stay. The zero interest rate environment stabilised the economy after 2007/8 but at the cost of intensifying asset price inflation through the r > g dynamic. But that’s now broken down. The deflationary forces of the neoliberal era (access to global labour, cheap goods through international markets, the internet, debt financing of consumer spending etc) are exhausted or in reverse. So the forces and mechanisms keeping inflation down are gone, at exactly the point when there are renewed inflationary pressures: deglobalisation, climate change induced supply shocks and labour scarcity driven by ageing populations. My understanding is there’s significant uncertainty about how this will manifest sequentially but the climate crisis dimension seems inarguable to me.

I’ve recently taken to thinking of these two mechanisms as the enshittification of (political) economy: stagnant growth means that inflation and growing wealth inequality produce an economy which is ever more shit. The capacity to stabilise the system or invest decreases as the enshittification dynamic takes hold. It’s a vicious cycle and the more obvious it becomes, the less tenable neoliberal centrism becomes. This conjuncture can’t continue indefinitely. Something will break, sooner rather than later. The far-right represent one path forward, with an economic programme that ultimately amounts to mitigating the costs for a racialised in group while managing the social collapse through vicious attacks on the out group. The danger is that increasingly large sections of capital will come to endorse that, which I think is ultimately how we should read the difference between Trump 1 and Trump 2.

Ultimately something has to change about the political economy of this conjuncture. Increasingly I’m thinking ‘AI’ is positioned as a form of magical thinking for technocratic centrists who want to avoid this conclusion, functioning as the deus ex machina which could square the circle. If you get significant productivity growth going on again then you can keep the underlying political economy unchanged because the same mechanisms no longer operate in a zero-sum way: the rich can continue to get richer but the poorer can have their living standards sustained.

If you combine this investment in the status quo along with the ‘new cold war’ over AI in which it becomes a vector to manage relative American decline, you can begin to see the struggle over AI as the central question of political economy in the 2020s. This is the macro context in which we have to make sense of the micro and meso dimensions of LLMs being diffused. Obviously the shit is going to hit the fan at some point soon because the bubble cannot continue to growth indefinitely, at which point the underlying economic logic of the conjuncture will become a much more stark fault line of political economy i.e. do we try and reinflate the bubble or have the social fight which has been postponed for the last 20 years through a series of spatiotemporal fixes?

I feel slightly out of my depth with this terrain. The hill I will die on though is that there is some magic in LLMs even if it falls short of the magical thinking of the technocratic neoliberals. The problem is that the political economy organisations face under this conjuncture presses them to undercut exactly the conditions which are needed to realise the potential productivity gains: professional autonomy, freedom to experiment, respect for tacit knowledge and time to embed the experiments. The political economy which makes the productivity gains imperative simultaneously hinders the realisation of those gains.

#AI #enshittification #farRight #martinWolf #politicalEconomy

Client Challenge

“nobody can be trusted with absolute power, least of all the demagogues who seek it. The one good thing Trump’s trade policies are achieving is to demonstrate this yet again. They are harbingers of chaos. The world’s challenge is to survive the folly. The US’s is to end it.” #MartinWolf https://www.ft.com/content/a3e6174c-25e9-4428-9109-16e37319e9e2
The economic consequences of a mad king

Trump’s delight in doing whatever he wishes in the moment is incompatible with stability and sustained dynamism

Financial Times

News Haber EshaHaber FT Başyazarı Wolf, Bakan Şimşek'i övdü: Financial Times'ın başyazarı Martin Wolf, Davos Zirvesi'nde soruları yanıtladı. Türkiye ekonomisiyle ilgili yaptığı değerlendirmede, Hazine ve Maliye Bakanı Mehmet Şimşek'in ortodoks politikalar izleyerek önceki ciddi ekonomik hataları düzelttiğini ifade eden Wolf, Türkiye’nin geleceği konusunda iyimser olduğunu belirtti.

Wolf,… https://www.eshahaber.com.tr/haber/ft-basyazari-wolf-bakan-simsek-i-ovdu-199142.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon EshaHaber.com.tr #Türkiye #Ekonomi #DavosZirvesi #MehmetŞimşek #MartinWolf

FT Başyazarı Wolf, Bakan Şimşek'i övdü

Ekonomi - Hazine ve Maliye Bakanı Mehmet Şimşek'in ekonomide bazı ciddi hataları tersine çevirdiğini belirten Wolf, " Her zaman Türkiye'nin geleceği konusunda iyimserim. İyi yönetilirse çok ciddi bir potansiyeli var" dedi.

www.eshahaber.com.tr - EshaHaber Güncel Gündem Sondakika Haberleri

#KI-#Fakes:

Falsche Bilder für den echten US-Wahlkampf

Wie ein KI-#Bildgenerator aus dem #Schwarzwald die #Wählerschaft in den #USA beeinflusst – auch nach der #Abstimmung.

Eine Analyse von #MartinWolf

https://www.golem.de/news/ki-fakes-falsche-bilder-fuer-den-echten-us-wahlkampf-2411-190350.html

KI-Fakes: Falsche Bilder für den echten US-Wahlkampf - Golem.de

Wie ein KI-Bildgenerator aus dem Schwarzwald die Wählerschaft in den USA beeinflusst – auch nach der Abstimmung.

Golem.de

@LaureM

2/2
“A party with those characteristics … the Leader is right, the state and the party are one under the control of the Leader, that independent legal institutions operating independently is unacceptable. This is #fascism. There’s no doubt about it.”

#MartinWolf #FT #FTNewsBrief #immunity #GOP #maga #scotus #trump

@LaureM

1/2

Some ominous possibilities for the US. Doesn’t look good.

#democracy
#autocracy
#FT
#MartinWolf

📬 Piratainment damals und heute – ein Podcast mit tarnkappe.info
#Intern #Podcast #Golemde #LarsSobiraj #MartinWolf #Podcastbeauftragter #tarnkappeinfo https://sc.tarnkappe.info/96f388
Piratainment damals und heute - ein Podcast mit tarnkappe.info

Der neue Podcast mit dem Betreiber von tarnkappe.info dreht sich um Piraten damals wie heute. Mit uns sprach Martin Wolf von Golem.de.

Tarnkappe.info