🤖 Most people still treat AI chatbots like a private confessional, but they aren’t. 😳 Every question is logged, stored, and potentially discoverable, sometimes even after you’ve deleted it. OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic all retain user prompts by default, often under the guise of “memory” or “service improvement.”

And here’s the kicker: a federal court order now forces OpenAI to preserve all ChatGPT conversations, including “Temporary” ones users assumed were erased. So the notion of ephemeral chats is gone. That should change how people think about what they type into these systems.

The bigger issue is that the line between “helpful personalization” and “permanent surveillance record” is blurring fast. What looks convenient today could look like an exposure tomorrow.

TL;DR
⚠️ AI queries are logged
🔐 Deleted chats still saved
🧠 “Memory” is default setting
📂 Court orders enforce retention

https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/18/opinion_column_ai_surveillance/
#AI #Privacy #DataSecurity #Surveillance #FRCP #EDRM #security #privacy #cloud #infosec #cybersecurity #LegalHold

Every question you ask, every comment you make, I'll be recording you

Opinion: When you're asking AI chatbots for answers, they're data-mining you

The Register

@samhainnight

Today, the Judgment (doc 178) was issued, confirming the jury award of $5 million in #Carroll v. #Trump (II), (1:22-cv-10016) District Court, S.D. New York, free copy of docket here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65895581/carroll-v-trump/

Later, the Trump lawyers started the paperwork for an appeal. (doc 179). At this stage, the argument for why the jury and district judge were wrong is still being drafted, but DJT will need to file a bond for the full amount of the judgment plus interest and if the judgment is upheld, EJC is on the fast path to seeing DJT pay for it.

#IANAL but I think the mechanism is that DJT has to ask the District Court or the Appellate court for a stay of the judgment under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure #FRAP 8. (He should do it in district court, as "I think the judge hates me" isn't really good cause to bypass the district court.) https://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/clerk/case_filing/rules/rules_home.html

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure #FRCP 62(b) seems to highly favor a bond be given in exchange for the stay. It's automatic, DJT allegedly has the money, avoids clowning in front of the appellate judges — many good reasons why this is the predicted path. https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_62

Carroll v. Trump, 1:22-cv-10016 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Carroll v. Trump, 1:22-cv-10016 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

CourtListener