>> #trump’s a divider… He never meant to court all of us
If you replace one letter above, it will give new meaning to #DivideByZero.
Just replace “court” with “count” and you have a #ZeroDenom 😂
>> #trump’s a divider… He never meant to court all of us
If you replace one letter above, it will give new meaning to #DivideByZero.
Just replace “court” with “count” and you have a #ZeroDenom 😂
Here is a humorous example that “proves” that 1 == 2.
I’m attaching a screenshot that captures the essence of the argument that seems quite logical, but the conclusion after the creep is garbage because a #divideByZero has already happened by the time you reach the final result.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbliihTJ4v4 [Turn off sound if you don’t speak #Hindi. The screens are all in English — no subtitles needed]
This style of rhetoric is pervasive in #Project2025
It starts with seemingly simple ideas which resonate with conservatives but are controversial with liberals and progressives.
Then it QUICKLY builds up on that and introduces even more controversial ideas.
The creep is gradual, but unmistakable. Most people look at the end result and start debating the merits of that end result.
Meanwhile, a #divideByZero has already happened in earlier paragraphs and pages. #NipItInTheBud.
Random programming / maths question:
I keep my accounts in #LibreOffice, and when I start the year, I reset all the values to 0.
I have one cell which calculates a percentage. When I set all cells to 0, it throws a Divide By Zero error.
Is this correct? Surely the only number you can actually divide by zero is zero? Or is dividing zero by zero also mathematically/programmatically incorrect?